Automatic Selection of Multiple Texture Feature Extraction Methods for Texture Pattern Classification

Texture-based pixel classification has been traditionally carried out by applying texture feature extraction methods that belong to a same family (e.g., Gabor filters). However, recent work has shown that such classification tasks can be significantly improved if multiple texture methods from different families are properly integrated. In this line, this paper proposes a new selection scheme that automatically determines a subset of those methods whose integration produces classification results similar to those obtained by integrating all the available methods but at a lower computational cost. Experiments with real complex images show that the proposed selection scheme achieves better results than well-known feature selection algorithms, and that the final classifier outperforms recognized texture classifiers.

[1]  J. Berger Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[2]  Domenec Puig,et al.  Pixel classification through divergence-based integration of texture methods with conflict resolution , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[3]  John Reidar Mathiassen,et al.  Texture Similarity Measure Using Kullback-Leibler Divergence between Gamma Distributions , 2002, ECCV.

[4]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Irrelevant Features and the Subset Selection Problem , 1994, ICML.

[5]  Ian Burns,et al.  Measuring texture classification algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[6]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Contour and Texture Analysis for Image Segmentation , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[7]  Domenec Puig,et al.  Improving texture pattern recognition by integration of multiple texture feature extraction methods , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[8]  Lluís A. Belanche Muñoz,et al.  Feature selection algorithms: a survey and experimental evaluation , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2002. Proceedings..

[9]  Trygve Randen,et al.  Filtering for Texture Classification: A Comparative Study , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Unsupervised Texture Segmentation in a Deterministic Annealing Framework , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Huan Liu,et al.  Feature Selection for Classification , 1997, Intell. Data Anal..

[12]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..