Exploring the Relationship Between Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning via Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping

The normative literature within the field of Knowledge Management has tended to concentrate on techniques and methodologies for codifying knowledge. Similarly, the literature on organizational learning, focuses on aspects of those knowledge that are pertinent at the macro-organizational level (i.e. the overall business). There remains little published literature on how knowledge management and organizational learning are interrelated within business scenarios. In addressing this relative void, the authors of this paper present a model that highlights the factors for such an interrelationship, which are extrapolated from a manufacturing organisation using a qualitative case study research strategy, supplanted by a cognitive mapping technique: Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM). The paper looks at the Information Systems Evaluation (ISE) process within a manufacturing organisation, the authors subsequently presenting a model that not only defines a relationship between KM and OL, but highlights factors that could lead a firm to develop itself towards a learning organisation.

[1]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[2]  Z. Irani,et al.  Working towards agile manufacturing in the UK industry , 1999 .

[3]  Shigeo Abe,et al.  Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems , 1996, Springer US.

[4]  E. B. Zechmeister,et al.  Research Methods in Psychology. , 1990 .

[5]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[6]  David J. Eckert Approved by , 1987 .

[7]  G. Currie,et al.  The Limits of a Technological Fix to Knowledge Management , 2004 .

[8]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[9]  Karl M. Wiig,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Introduction and Perspective , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  P. Mayring Qualitative Content Analysis , 2000 .

[11]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[12]  David T. Croasdell It's Role in Organizational Memory and Learning , 2001, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[13]  Atefeh Sadri McCampbell,et al.  Knowledge management: the new challenge for the 21st century , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  McMaster Unlveristy,et al.  The Use of Cognitive Mapping for Information Requirements Analysis , 1986 .

[15]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[16]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[17]  Scott McCoy,et al.  The most important issues in knowledge management , 2002, CACM.

[18]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[19]  David W. Conrath,et al.  The Use of Cognitive Mapping for Information Requirements Analysis , 1986, MIS Q..

[20]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Applying concepts of fuzzy cognitive mapping to model: The IT/IS investment evaluation process , 2002 .

[21]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Developing a frame of reference for ex-ante IT/IS investment evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[23]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Applying concepts of fuzzy cognitive mapping to model IT/IS investment evaluation factors , 2002 .

[24]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Linking knowledge transformation to Information Systems evaluation , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[26]  Michalis Glykas,et al.  Fuzzy cognitive maps in business analysis and performance-driven change , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[27]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Knowledge Dependencies in Fuzzy Information Systems Evaluation , 2005, AMCIS.