Modelling Segmented Cardiotocography Time-Series Signals Using One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks for the Early Detection of Abnormal Birth Outcomes

Gynaecologists and obstetricians visually interpret cardiotocography (CTG) traces using the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) guidelines to assess the wellbeing of the foetus during antenatal care. This approach has raised concerns among professionals with regards to inter- and intra-variability where clinical diagnosis only has a 30\% positive predictive value when classifying pathological outcomes. Machine learning models, trained with FIGO and other user derived features extracted from CTG traces, have been shown to increase positive predictive capacity and minimise variability. This is only possible however when class distributions are equal which is rarely the case in clinical trials where case-control observations are heavily skewed in favour of normal outcomes. Classes can be balanced using either synthetic data derived from resampled case training data or by decreasing the number of control instances. However, this either introduces bias or removes valuable information. Concerns have also been raised regarding machine learning studies and their reliance on manually handcrafted features. While this has led to some interesting results, deriving an optimal set of features is considered to be an art as well as a science and is often an empirical and time consuming process. In this paper, we address both of these issues and propose a novel CTG analysis methodology that a) splits CTG time-series signals into n-size windows with equal class distributions, and b) automatically extracts features from time-series windows using a one dimensional convolutional neural network (1DCNN) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) ensemble. Collectively, the proposed approach normally distributes classes and removes the need to handcrafted features from CTG traces.

[1]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[2]  Per Olofsson,et al.  New FIGO and Swedish intrapartum cardiotocography classification systems incorporated in the fetal ECG ST analysis (STAN) interpretation algorithm: agreements and discrepancies in cardiotocography classification and evaluation of significant ST events , 2018, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[3]  J. M. Swartjes,et al.  Computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate: 2. Detection of accelerations and decelerations. , 1990, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[4]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Survey on Cardiotocography Feature Extraction Algorithms for Foetal Welfare Assessment , 2016 .

[5]  Maria Romano,et al.  Time-frequency analysis of CTG signals , 2009 .

[6]  Paul Fergus,et al.  Machine learning ensemble modelling to classify caesarean section and vaginal delivery types using Cardiotocography traces , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[7]  D. Moster,et al.  Delay in intervention increases neonatal morbidity in births monitored with cardiotocography and ST‐waveform analysis , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[8]  Martín Abadi,et al.  TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems , 2016, ArXiv.

[9]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Using nonlinear features for fetal heart rate classification , 2012, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[10]  Jenna Wiens,et al.  Learning to Exploit Invariances in Clinical Time-Series Data using Sequence Transformer Networks , 2018, MLHC.

[11]  J. Richman,et al.  Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[12]  François Chollet,et al.  Keras: The Python Deep Learning library , 2018 .

[13]  Maria G. Signorini,et al.  Monitoring Fetal Heart Rate during Pregnancy: Contributions from Advanced Signal Processing and Wearable Technology , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[14]  C. East,et al.  Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  Doina Precup,et al.  Classification of Normal and Hypoxic Fetuses From Systems Modeling of Intrapartum Cardiotocography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  L. Lhotska,et al.  Assessment of non-linear features for intrapartal fetal heart rate classification , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[17]  Chee Khiang Pang,et al.  Classification of Imbalanced Data by Oversampling in Kernel Space of Support Vector Machines , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[18]  Sarah Rhöse,et al.  Inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of non‐reassuring cardiotocography analysis and subsequent clinical management , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[19]  J. V. van Laar,et al.  Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability for fetal surveillance: review of the literature , 2008, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[20]  Ersen Yilmaz,et al.  Determination of Fetal State from Cardiotocogram Using LS-SVM with Particle Swarm Optimization and Binary Decision Tree , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[21]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[22]  Paulo Gonçalves,et al.  Hurst exponent and intrapartum fetal heart rate: Impact of decelerations , 2013, Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems.

[23]  Jiheon Kang,et al.  Novel Leakage Detection by Ensemble CNN-SVM and Graph-Based Localization in Water Distribution Systems , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[24]  Nizar Bouguila,et al.  Classification of caesarean section and normal vaginal deliveries using foetal heart rate signals and advanced machine learning algorithms , 2017, Biomedical engineering online.

[25]  H. Murray,et al.  Antenatal foetal heart monitoring. , 2017, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[26]  Tom Brosch,et al.  Deep learning of brain images and its application to multiple sclerosis , 2016 .

[27]  Gari D Clifford,et al.  Doppler‐based fetal heart rate analysis markers for the detection of early intrauterine growth restriction , 2017, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[28]  D. Rindskopf,et al.  The value of latent class analysis in medical diagnosis. , 1986, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  Hasan Ocak,et al.  A Medical Decision Support System Based on Support Vector Machines and the Genetic Algorithm for the Evaluation of Fetal Well-Being , 2013, Journal of Medical Systems.

[30]  Turgay Ibrikci,et al.  Analysis of Cardiotocogram Data for Fetal Distress Determination by Decision Tree Based Adaptive Boosting Approach , 2014 .

[31]  Mohamed El Bachir Menai,et al.  Influence of Feature Selection on Naïve Bayes Classifier for Recognizing Patterns in Cardiotocograms , 2013 .

[32]  C. East,et al.  Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[33]  P. Melillo,et al.  Automatic Prediction of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events Using Heart Rate Variability Analysis , 2015, PloS one.

[34]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Discriminating Normal from "Abnormal" Pregnancy Cases Using an Automated FHR Evaluation Method , 2014, SETN.

[35]  Shuang Song,et al.  Influence of Electrode Placement on Signal Quality for Ambulatory Pregnancy Monitoring , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[36]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 1996 .

[37]  E. Blix,et al.  ST waveform analysis versus cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized trials , 2016, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[38]  G. Saade,et al.  Uterine activity during pregnancy and labor assessed by simultaneous recordings from the myometrium and abdominal surface in the rat. , 1998, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.