A Machine Learning-based Surface Electromyography Topography Evaluation for Prognostic Prediction of Functional Restoration Rehabilitation in Chronic Low Back Pain

Study Design. A retrospective study. Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and applicability of support vector machine (SVM) algorithm in classifying patients with LBP who would obtain satisfactory or unsatisfactory progress after the functional restoration rehabilitation program. Summary of Background Data. Dynamic surface electromyography (SEMG) topography has demonstrated the potential use in predicting the prognosis of functional restoration rehabilitation for patients with low back pain (LBP). However, processing from raw SEMG topography to make prediction is not easy to clinicians. Methods. A total of 30 patients with nonspecific LBP were recruited and divided into “responding” and “non-responding” group according to the change of Visual analog pain rating scale and Oswestry Disability Index. Each patient received a 12-week functional restoration rehabilitation program. A normal database was calculated from a control group from 48 healthy participants. Root-mean-square difference (RMSD) was extracted from the recorded dynamic SEMG topography during symmetrical and asymmetrical trunk-movement. SVM and cross-validation were applied to the prediction based on the optimized features selected by the sequential floating forward selection (SFFS) algorithm. Results. RMSD feature parameters following rehabilitation in the “responding” group showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) with the one in the “nonresponding” group. The SVM classifier with Quadratic kernel based on SFFS-selected features showed the best prediction performance (accuracy: 96.67%, sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 93.75%, average area under curve [AUC]: 0.8925) comparing with linear kernel (accuracy: 80.00%, sensitivity: 85.71%, specificity: 75.00%, average AUC: 0.7825), polynomial kernel (accuracy: 93.33%, sensitivity: 92.86%, specificity: 93.75%, average AUC: 0.9675), and radial basis function (RBF) kernel (accuracy: 86.67%, sensitivity: 85.71%, specificity: 87.50%, average AUC: 0.7900). Conclusion. The use of SVM-based classifier of SEMG topography can be applied to identify the patient responding to functional restoration rehabilitation, which will help the healthcare worker to improve the efficiency of LBP rehabilitation. Level of Evidence: 3

[1]  T. Hastie,et al.  Machine learning in human movement biomechanics: Best practices, common pitfalls, and new opportunities. , 2018, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Alfred Ultsch,et al.  Machine learning in pain research , 2017, Pain.

[3]  N. Olivier,et al.  A Controlled and Retrospective Study of 144 Chronic Low Back Pain Patients to Evaluate the Effectiveness of an Intensive Functional Restoration Program in France , 2016, Healthcare.

[4]  Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Feature selection using feature dissimilarity measure and density-based clustering: Application to biological data , 2015, Journal of Biosciences.

[5]  Tzu-Tsung Wong,et al.  Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation , 2015, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Lars Berglund,et al.  Which Patients With Low Back Pain Benefit From Deadlift Training? , 2015, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[7]  Chen-chiang Lin,et al.  Combined image enhancement, feature extraction, and classification protocol to improve detection and diagnosis of rotator-cuff tears on MR imaging. , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[8]  Yong Hu,et al.  Time-varying surface electromyography topography as a prognostic tool for chronic low back pain rehabilitation. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[9]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Optimization of breast mass classification using sequential forward floating selection (SFFS) and a support vector machine (SVM) model , 2014, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[10]  T. Stanton,et al.  Do various baseline characteristics of transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus predict clinical outcomes in nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review , 2013, PAIN®.

[11]  J. van Limbeek,et al.  Predictive factors for successful clinical outcome 1 year after an intensive combined physical and psychological programme for chronic low back pain , 2013, European Spine Journal.

[12]  M. Davidson,et al.  The effectiveness of physiotherapy functional restoration for post-acute low back pain: a systematic review. , 2013, Manual therapy.

[13]  Gail M. Williams,et al.  A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. , 2012, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  É. Legrand,et al.  Psychosocial risk factors for chronic low back pain in primary care--a systematic review. , 2011, Family practice.

[15]  Yong Hu,et al.  An automated ECG-artifact removal method for trunk muscle surface EMG recordings. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  Bart W. Koes,et al.  A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[17]  Yong Hu,et al.  Flexion-Relaxation Ratio in Sitting: Application in Low Back Pain Rehabilitation , 2010, Spine.

[18]  Yong Hu,et al.  Lumbar muscle electromyographic dynamic topography during flexion-extension. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[19]  Yong Hu,et al.  Effect of electrocardiographic contamination on surface electromyography assessment of back muscles. , 2009, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[20]  Heather L. Butler,et al.  Psychological influences on repetition-induced summation of activity-related pain in patients with chronic low back pain , 2009, PAIN®.

[21]  R. Deyo,et al.  Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Lumbar Fusion Surgery to Nonoperative Care for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain , 2007, Spine.

[22]  M. Geisser,et al.  Ability of Early Response to Predict Discharge Outcomes With Physical Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain , 2006, Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain.

[23]  Gregory E Hicks,et al.  Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  B. Hoggart,et al.  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. , 2005, Journal of clinical nursing.

[25]  John D. Childs,et al.  Responsiveness of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale in Patients with Low Back Pain , 2005, Spine.

[26]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  A Systematic Review of Sociodemographic, Physical, and Psychological Predictors of Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation—or, Back School Treatment Outcome in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain , 2005, Spine.

[27]  A. Nordwall,et al.  The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[28]  C. A. Murthy,et al.  Unsupervised Feature Selection Using Feature Similarity , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[29]  P. Pudil,et al.  Adaptive floating search methods in feature selection , 1999, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[30]  J. Vlaeyen,et al.  Fear of movement/(re)injury and muscular reactivity in chronic low back pain patients: an experimental investigation , 1999, PAIN.

[31]  J. Derksen,et al.  Utility of selected MMPI-2 scales in the outcome prediction for patients with chronic back pain , 1999 .

[32]  T. Bendix,et al.  Can It Be Predicted Which Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Should Be Offered Tertiary Rehabilitation in a Functional Restoration Program?: A Search for Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Physical Predictors , 1998, Spine.

[33]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[34]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Feature Selection: Evaluation, Application, and Small Sample Performance , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[35]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[36]  T. Mayer,et al.  Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation: I. A Standardized Protocol and Normative Database , 1988, Spine.

[37]  T. Mayer,et al.  Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation: II. A Comparison with Isokinetic Lifting in a Disabled Chronic Low-Back Pain Industrial Population , 1988, Spine.

[38]  A. Love,et al.  The MMPI and psychological factors in chronic low back pain: a review , 1987, Pain.

[39]  D. Russell,et al.  Efficacy of electroacupuncture and tens in the rehabilitation of chronic low back pain patients , 1986, Pain.

[40]  A. Atienza,et al.  Shape based local thresholding for binarization of document images , 2012, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[41]  H. Hurri,et al.  Psychological factors in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Follow-up study of a back school intervention. , 1988, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.