SELECTION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION : EFFECTS OF INBREEDING RATE AND INBREEDING ENVIRONMENT

The magnitude of inbreeding depression in small populations may depend on the effectiveness with which natural selection purges deleterious recessive alleles from populations during inbreeding. The effectiveness of this purging process, however, may be influenced by the rate of inbreeding and the environment in which inbreeding occurs. Although some experimental studies have examined these factors individually, no study has examined their joint effect or potential interaction. In the present study, therefore, we performed an experiment in which 180 lineages of Drosophila melanogaster were inbred at slow and fast inbreeding rates within each of three inbreeding environments (benign, high temperature, and competitive). The fitness of all lineages was then measured in a common benign environment. Although slow inbreeding reduced inbreeding depression in lineages inbred under high temperature stress, a similar reduction was not observed with respect to the benign or competitive treatments. Overall, therefore, the effect of inbreeding rate was nonsignificant. The inbreeding environment, in contrast, had a larger and more consistent effect on inbreeding depression. Under both slow and fast rates of inbreeding, inbreeding depression was significantly reduced in lineages inbred in the presence of a competitor D. melanogaster strain. A similar reduction of inbreeding depression occurred in lineages inbred under high temperature stress at a slow inbreeding rate. Overall, our findings show that inbreeding depression is reduced when inbreeding takes place in a stressful environment, possibly due to more effective purging under such conditions.

[1]  D. H. Reed Relationship between Population Size and Fitness , 2005 .

[2]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Quantitative genetic variation in an island population of the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria) , 2004, Heredity.

[3]  R. Frankham,et al.  Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Z. Bochdanovits,et al.  Temperature dependent larval resource allocation shaping adult body size in Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[5]  D. H. Reed,et al.  Inbreeding and extinction: The effect of environmental stress and lineage , 2002, Conservation Genetics.

[6]  L. Keller,et al.  Inbreeding effects in wild populations. , 2002 .

[7]  J. Wang Effects of population structures and selection strategies on the purging of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations. , 2000, Genetical research.

[8]  L. Partridge,et al.  A comparison of the genetic basis of wing size divergence in three parallel body size clines of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1999, Genetics.

[9]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. , 1999, Genetical research.

[10]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. , 1999, Genetical research.

[11]  B. Husband,et al.  EVOLUTION OF THE MAGNITUDE AND TIMING OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  M. Toro,et al.  The effect of inbreeding on the redistribution of genetic variance of fecundity and viability in Tribolium castaneum , 1995, Heredity.

[13]  L. Pray,et al.  GENETIC VARIATION IN INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN THE RED FLOUR BEETLE TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Genotype—environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  P. Sharp,et al.  Heterosis × nutrition interaction in Drosophila melanogaster , 1988, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[16]  R. Lande,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SELF‐FERTILIZATION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS. I. GENETIC MODELS , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  H. Jungen,et al.  AVERAGE FITNESS OF POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AS ESTIMATED USING COMPOUND‐AUTOSOME STRAINS , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  D. Wool,et al.  SIB‐MATING POPULATIONS IN AN UNPREDICTABLE ENVIRONMENT: EFFECTS ON COMPONENTS OF FITNESS , 1976, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  N. Morton,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF GENE FREQUENCY DRIFT IN SMALL POPULATIONS , 1955 .

[20]  S. Wright,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF GENE FREQUENCIES IN VERY SMALL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. II. BAR , 1954 .

[21]  T. Beebee,et al.  Intraspecific competition disadvantages inbred natterjack toad (Bufo calamita) genotypes over outbred ones in a shared pond environment , 2005 .

[22]  M. Goddard,et al.  Effect of rate of inbreeding on inbreeding depression in Drosophila melanogaster , 2004, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[23]  R. F. del Castillo FITNESS CONSEQUENCES OF MATERNAL AND NONMATERNAL COMPONENTS OF INBREEDING IN THE GYNODIOECIOUS PHACELIA DUBIA. , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.