Circular economy concepts in urban mobility alternatives using integrated DIBR method and fuzzy Dombi CoCoSo model

Abstract This study aims to explore the circular economy concepts which are also sustainable and can be used for the 17th Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by United Nations member countries. The study focuses on the urban mobility setting. The prioritization of the possible CE concepts for a planning authority in a big city is examined where the decision process is subject to certain restrictions such as existing natural resources, financial and human capital. A case scenario is used to illustrate the formulation and solution of the problem. The method used to solve the problem comprises two stages. First, the DIBR method (Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria) is presented to determine the weights of criteria. Then second, the fuzzy Dombi based Combined Compromise Solution (D’ CoCoSo) is proposed for prioritizing the circular economy concepts for urban mobility. The proposed multi-criteria framework allows decision-makers to better perceive the relationship between the criteria, which contributes to rational reasoning and objective evaluation of alternatives. The DIBR method enables decision-makers to better perceive relationships between criteria, since it considers relations between adjacent criteria. Thus, it eliminates the problem of defining relations between remote criteria, which often decreases the consistency of results in subjective models. The results obtained for case scenario emphasize that among four alternatives “Building infrastructure for zero-emission vehicles and energy storage” should be prioritized over relatively cheaper remedies such as “Using big data solutions to optimize urban mobility systems”. In that respect, the planners are expected to be direct and long-term focused in choosing the CE concepts. The method used here can be extended for other decision-making problems of planners in achieving SDGs for urban planning.

[1]  Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani,et al.  A VIKOR and TOPSIS focused reanalysis of the MADM methods based on logarithmic normalization , 2020, ArXiv.

[2]  Fatih Ecer,et al.  PRIORITIZING THE WEIGHTS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA UNDER FUZZINESS: THE FUZZY FULL CONSISTENCY METHOD – FUCOM-F , 2020 .

[3]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Model for selecting a route for the transport of hazardous materials using a fuzzy logic system , 2021, Vojnotehnicki glasnik.

[4]  C. Macharis,et al.  Towards freight transport system unification: reviewing and combining the advancements in the physical internet and synchromodal transport research , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[5]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Vehicle-to-grid power implementation: From stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy , 2005 .

[6]  Dries Haeseldonckx,et al.  On the evolution of “CLEANER PRODUCTION” as a concept and a practice , 2018 .

[7]  C. Gasol,et al.  Methodological framework for the implementation of circular economy in urban systems , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[8]  J. Sarkis,et al.  Blockchain and the circular economy: potential tensions and critical reflections from practice , 2020 .

[9]  Yang Liu,et al.  Barriers to smart waste management for a circular economy in China , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[10]  Ali Ebadi Torkayesh,et al.  An integrated BWM-LBWA-CoCoSo framework for evaluation of healthcare sectors in Eastern Europe , 2021 .

[11]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  Investigating ideal-solution based multicriteria decision making techniques for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[12]  Miloš Madić,et al.  COMPARISON OF THREE FUZZY MCDM METHODS FOR SOLVING THE SUPPLIER SELECTION PROBLEM , 2019 .

[13]  A. Peña-García,et al.  Proposal to Foster Sustainability through Circular Economy-Based Engineering: A Profitable Chain from Waste Management to Tunnel Lighting , 2017 .

[14]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Integration of energy, water and environmental systems for a sustainable development , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[15]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems , 2019, Management Decision.

[16]  Ogunmakinde,et al.  A Review of Circular Economy Development Models in China, Germany and Japan , 2019, Recycling.

[17]  Manik Chandra Das,et al.  Selection of the barriers of supply chain management in Indian manufacturing sectors due to Covid-19 impacts , 2020, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications.

[18]  Jong Hyuk Park,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Flight Point Classification Algorithm Based on Symmetric Big Data , 2016, Symmetry.

[19]  Duško Tešić,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making Model with Z-Numbers Based on FUCOM and MABAC model , 2020, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[20]  Qaisar Khan,et al.  Einstein Geometric Aggregation Operators using a Novel Complex Interval-valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Setting with Application in Green Supplier Chain Management , 2021 .

[21]  J. Palm,et al.  Achieving the Circular Economy: Exploring the Role of Local Governments, Business and Citizens in an Urban Context , 2021, Energies.

[22]  Antonino Vitetta,et al.  Passengers and freight mobility with electric vehicles: A methodology to plan green transport and logistic services near port areas , 2019, Transportation Research Procedia.

[23]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[24]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[25]  S Dragan Pamučar,et al.  Multiple-criteria model for optimal off-road vehicle selection for passenger transportation: BWM-COPRAS model , 2020 .

[26]  José Luis Cabral de Moura Borges,et al.  Visualization of Urban Mobility Data from Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2019, Sensors.

[27]  J. Zhan,et al.  Eco-Efficiency Evaluation of Regional Circular Economy: A Case Study in Zengcheng, Guangzhou , 2018 .

[28]  J. Dombi A general class of fuzzy operators, the demorgan class of fuzzy operators and fuzziness measures induced by fuzzy operators , 1982 .

[29]  Márcio de Almeida D'Agosto,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria model for evaluating sustainable urban freight transportation operations , 2018 .

[30]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Application of fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy CODAS for analysis of workforce attributes pertaining to Industry 4.0: a case study , 2020 .

[31]  Bon-Gang Hwang,et al.  Using system dynamics to analyze the development of urban freight transportation system based on rail transit: A case study of Beijing , 2020 .

[32]  J. Fellner,et al.  Potentials for a circular economy of mineral construction materials and demolition waste in urban areas: a case study from Vienna , 2020 .

[33]  Peter Jones,et al.  The evolution of urban mobility: The interplay of academic and policy perspectives , 2014 .

[34]  Michela Le Pira,et al.  Connected shared mobility for passengers and freight: Investigating the potential of crowdshipping in urban areas , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[35]  Applying Circular Economy Principles to Urban Housing , 2020 .

[36]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  Development of an integrated decision making model for location selection of logistics centers in the Spanish autonomous communities , 2020, Expert Syst. Appl..

[37]  Roozbeh Ketabi,et al.  Enabling a circular economy in the built environment sector through blockchain technology , 2021 .

[38]  József Dombi,et al.  The Generalized Dombi Operator Family and the Multiplicative Utility Function , 2009 .

[39]  Hamed Fazlollahtabar,et al.  Rough Best-Worst Method for Supplier Selection in Biofuel Companies based on Green criteria , 2021, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications.

[40]  Harish Garg,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy interactive Hamacher power aggregation operators for assessment of express service quality with entropy weight , 2020, Soft Computing.

[41]  G. Villalba,et al.  Assessing the sustainability of contrasting land use scenarios through the Socioecological Integrated Analysis (SIA) of the metropolitan green infrastructure in Barcelona , 2020, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[42]  Weslynne Ashton,et al.  Infrastructuring the Circular Economy , 2020, Energies.

[43]  A. Velenturf,et al.  Modularisation as enabler of circular economy in energy infrastructure , 2020, Energy Policy.

[44]  A. Gravagnuolo,et al.  Matera: city of nature, city of culture, city of regeneration. Towards a landscape-based and culture-based urban circular economy , 2019 .

[45]  Anna Petit-Boix,et al.  Circular economy in cities: Reviewing how environmental research aligns with local practices , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[46]  Morteza Saberi,et al.  Are MCDM methods useful? A critical review of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) , 2019, Cogent Engineering.

[47]  Çağlar Karamaşa,et al.  Comparative assessment of social sustainability performance: Integrated data-driven weighting system and CoCoSo model , 2021 .

[48]  Daniel A. Brent,et al.  Traffic and crime , 2017 .

[49]  Tabasam Rashid,et al.  A New Method to Support Decision-Making in an Uncertain Environment Based on Normalized Interval-Valued Triangular Fuzzy Numbers and COMET Technique , 2020, Symmetry.

[50]  Shoshanna Saxe,et al.  Rethinking environmental LCA life stages for transport infrastructure to facilitate holistic assessment , 2020, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[51]  P. Schroeder,et al.  The Relevance of Circular Economy Practices to the Sustainable Development Goals , 2019 .

[52]  Daniel Johnson,et al.  Econometric analysis of the link between public transport accessibility and employment , 2017 .

[53]  C. Arcidiacono,et al.  Freight transport in the context of industrial ecology and sustainability: evaluation of uni- and multi-modality scenarios via life cycle assessment , 2020, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[54]  Vladimir Popović,et al.  Determining the importance of the criteria of traffic accessibility using fuzzy AHP and rough AHP method , 2019, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[55]  Fatih Ecer,et al.  Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model , 2020 .

[56]  Ibrahim Badi,et al.  Resolving a location selection problem by means of an integrated AHP-RAFSI approach , 2021 .

[57]  A. Marcomini,et al.  Circular Economy in China: Translating Principles into Practice , 2020, Sustainability.

[58]  Marko Radovanović,et al.  Application of hybrid model fuzzy AHP - VIKOR in selection of the most efficient procedure for rectification of the optical sight of the long-range rifle , 2020 .

[59]  Jun Ye,et al.  Some Single-Valued Neutrosophic Dombi Weighted Aggregation Operators for Multiple Attribute Decision-Making , 2017, Symmetry.