Talking without overlap in the airline cockpit: Precision timing at work

Abstract This study examines temporal organization for interaction in a specific work setting: the airline cockpit. It is generally concerned with precise timing for turn taking as a feature of competent conduct in collaborative professional work, and for creating an acceptable orderly flow of talk for tasks. Specifically, it pursues an observation that moments of overlapping talk, when two or more parties talk simultaneously, are rare in cockpit interaction. Pilots are instructed in training not to speak simultaneously; however, cockpit talk is highly conducive to overlap. Mostly pilots know who will say what to whom, and when, because they are legally required to use scripted procedural wordings. The trajectories of turns are predictable and projectable, and therefore are vulnerable to terminal overlap, when a recipient starts talking just as a current speaker is completing a turn. This does not happen, because airline pilots precisely time next talk to start at the actual, not projected, end of current talk. Pilots allow talk to emerge complete. Pilots orient to the strictly sequential nature of their work to accomplish conflicting setting-specific demands for talk, in situ and in real time. The paper uses transcriptions from audio and video recordings of pilots on actual passenger flights.

[1]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Time in Action , 2002, Current Anthropology.

[2]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  ‘Checklist complete’. or is it? closing a task in the airline cockpit , 2005 .

[3]  Gene H. Lerner On the syntax of sentences-in-progress , 1991, Language in Society.

[4]  W. Sharrock,et al.  The Organizational Accountability of Technological Work , 1998 .

[5]  Gene H. Lerner Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation , 1993 .

[6]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Opening up Closings , 1973 .

[7]  E. Schegloff Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 2000, Language in Society.

[8]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Making sequentiality salient: and-prefacing in the talk of airline pilots , 2006 .

[9]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Using conversation analysis to represent and analyse recorded voice data , 2005 .

[10]  G. Jefferson A Case of Precision Timing in Ordinary Conversation: Overlapped Tag-Positioned Address Terms in Closing Sequences , 1973 .

[11]  Cecilia E. Ford Contingency and Units in Interaction , 2004 .

[12]  M. Sorjonen Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design , 1994, Language in Society.

[13]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Seeing in Depth , 1995 .

[14]  Kent Drummond A Backward Glance at Interruptions. , 1989 .

[15]  D. Fessler Reproductive Immunosuppression and Diet , 2002, Current Anthropology.

[16]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[17]  Lorenza Mondada,et al.  Working with video: how surgeons produce video records of their actions , 2003 .

[18]  Gene H. Lerner Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion , 1989 .

[19]  Elinor Ochs,et al.  Down to the wire: The cultural clock of physicists and the discourse of consensus , 1997, Language in Society.

[20]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  Integrity in the Airline Cockpit: Embodying Claims About Progress for the Conduct of an Approach Briefing , 2004 .