Input–output robustness in simple bacterial signaling systems

Biological signaling systems produce an output, such as the level of a phosphorylated protein, in response to defined input signals. The output level as a function of the input level is called the system's input–output relation. One may ask whether this input–output relation is sensitive to changes in the concentrations of the system's components, such as proteins and ATP. Because component concentrations often vary from cell to cell, it might be expected that the input–output relation will likewise vary. If this is the case, different cells exposed to the same input signal will display different outputs. Such variability can be deleterious in systems where survival depends on accurate match of output to input. Here we suggest a mechanism that can provide input–output robustness, that is, an input–output relation that does not depend on variations in the concentrations of any of the system's components. The mechanism is based on certain bacterial signaling systems. It explains how specific molecular details can work together to provide robustness. Moreover, it suggests an approach that can help identify a wide family of nonequilibrium mechanisms that potentially have robust input–output relations.

[1]  M. Goulian,et al.  Robustness and the cycle of phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in a two-component regulatory system , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  T. Silhavy,et al.  Mutations That Alter the Kinase and Phosphatase Activities of the Two-Component Sensor EnvZ , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[4]  T. Silhavy,et al.  Function of conserved histidine-243 in phosphatase activity of EnvZ, the sensor for porin osmoregulation in Escherichia coli , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  R. Losick,et al.  Molecular genetics of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. , 1996, Annual review of genetics.

[6]  Mark Goulian,et al.  Robust control in bacterial regulatory circuits. , 2004, Current opinion in microbiology.

[7]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Reconstitution of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides cbb3-PrrBA signal transduction pathway in vitro. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[8]  A. Wagner Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems , 2005 .

[9]  Daniel O. Carmany,et al.  Genetic and Biochemical Studies of Phosphatase Activity of PhoR , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Biological robustness , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  A. Levchenko,et al.  Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[12]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[13]  Mark Goulian,et al.  The Escherichia coli CpxA-CpxR Envelope Stress Response System Regulates Expression of the Porins OmpF and OmpC , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  C. Wilke,et al.  Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems , 2006 .

[15]  H. Le Moual,et al.  Characterization of the Catalytic Activities of the PhoQ Histidine Protein Kinase of Salmonella entericaSerovar Typhimurium , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  K. Håkansson,et al.  Structure and mechanism of Na,K-ATPase: functional sites and their interactions. , 2003, Annual review of physiology.

[17]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[18]  U. Alon,et al.  Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis , 2022 .

[19]  K. F. Tipton,et al.  Biochemical systems analysis: A study of function and design in molecular biology , 1978 .

[20]  T. Silhavy,et al.  Transduction of envelope stress in Escherichia coli by the Cpx two-component system , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  M. Nakano,et al.  Involvement of ResE Phosphatase Activity in Down-Regulation of ResD-Controlled Genes in Bacillus subtilis during Aerobic Growth , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[22]  J. Doyle,et al.  Reverse Engineering of Biological Complexity , 2002, Science.

[23]  P. R. Jensen,et al.  Carbon and energy metabolism of atp mutants of Escherichia coli , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[24]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  D. Koshland,et al.  Non-genetic individuality: chance in the single cell , 1976, Nature.

[26]  M. Savageau,et al.  Parameter Sensitivity as a Criterion for Evaluating and Comparing the Performance of Biochemical Systems , 1971, Nature.

[27]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[28]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[29]  A. Ninfa,et al.  Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of a bacterial transcriptional activator by a transmembrane receptor. , 1989, Genes & development.

[30]  Mark Goulian,et al.  Continuous Control in Bacterial Regulatory Circuits , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[31]  D. Bray,et al.  Origins of individual swimming behavior in bacteria. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[32]  Howard C. Berg,et al.  E. coli in Motion , 2003 .

[33]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[34]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[35]  R. Gourse,et al.  Control of rRNA expression by small molecules is dynamic and nonredundant. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[36]  M. Inouye,et al.  Phosphatase activity of histidine kinase EnvZ without kinase catalytic domain. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  H. Kacser,et al.  The control of flux. , 1995, Biochemical Society transactions.

[38]  J. Hoch,et al.  Two-component signal transduction , 1995 .