Comprehensive assessment of the long-term energy harvest capabilities for PV systems with different tilt angles: Case study in Taiwan

Abstract This paper presents an overview of assessments of the long-term energy harvest capabilities of different photovoltaic (PV) systems. Based on semiconductor theory, an effective assessment approach is developed which can be used for evaluation of the ratios of energy harvested by different PV systems at various latitudes. The proposed approach makes evaluation of the theoretical and the benefits of their business applications easy to assess. To test the applicability of the proposed approach, single-axis sun-tracking type (SASTT), dual-axis sun-tracking type (DASTT), and fixed-type (FT) PV systems with various tilt angles, all with a rated power capacity of 3.68 kW, were installed in northern Taiwan (latitude of 24.92°) and experiments were conducted over a one year period. The prediction errors between theoretical simulations and long-term field verifications were less than 4%. The assessment results indicate that FT PV systems with a smaller tilt angle would be a better choice for installation in Taiwan. This finding overturns the current installation guidelines in Taiwan, i.e., FT PV systems should be installed with a tilt angle of 23.5°. The proposed assessment approach can provide data for objective comparisons of any type of PV system and offers a valuable reference for PV system installers before they invest time, money, and energy for installation.

[1]  Joe-Air Jiang,et al.  High-accuracy maximum power point estimation for photovoltaic arrays , 2011 .

[2]  Joe-Air Jiang,et al.  On application of a new hybrid maximum power point tracking (MPPT) based photovoltaic system to the closed plant factory , 2014 .

[3]  Settou Noureddine,et al.  Optimisation of a Solar Tracker System for Photovoltaic Power Plants in Saharian Region, Example of Ouargla☆ , 2014 .

[4]  Hashim Hizam,et al.  A comparative study of three types of grid connected photovoltaic systems based on actual performance , 2014 .

[5]  Gianfranco Rizzo,et al.  Application of dynamic programming to the optimal management of a hybrid power plant with wind turbines, photovoltaic panels and compressed air energy storage , 2012 .

[6]  Francisco Javier Gomez-Gil,et al.  Energy production of photovoltaic systems: Fixed, tracking, and concentrating , 2012 .

[7]  Nagamany Nirmalakhandan,et al.  Desalination using solar energy: Towards sustainability , 2011 .

[8]  R. Tang,et al.  Optical performance of inclined south-north single-axis tracked solar panels , 2010 .

[9]  Himangshu Ranjan Ghosh,et al.  Determining seasonal optimum tilt angles, solar radiations on variously oriented, single and double axis tracking surfaces at Dhaka , 2010 .

[10]  E. Dunlop,et al.  Analysis of one‐axis tracking strategies for PV systems in Europe , 2010 .

[11]  Akio Kitamura,et al.  Development and performance test of smart power conditioner for value-added PV application , 2003 .

[12]  R. Tang,et al.  Feasibility and optical performance of one axis three positions sun-tracking polar-axis aligned CPCs for photovoltaic applications , 2010 .

[13]  Hassan Fathabadi,et al.  Novel high accurate sensorless dual-axis solar tracking system controlled by maximum power point tracking unit of photovoltaic systems , 2016 .

[14]  Mohanad Alata,et al.  Developing a multipurpose sun tracking system using fuzzy control , 2005 .

[15]  Stefano Alessandrini,et al.  Analysis of the outdoor performance and efficiency of two grid connected photovoltaic systems in northern Italy , 2014 .

[16]  Taher S. Maatallah,et al.  Performance modeling and investigation of fixed, single and dual-axis tracking photovoltaic panel in Monastir city, Tunisia , 2011 .

[17]  Mariacristina Roscia,et al.  Comparative analysis of fixed and sun tracking low power PV systems considering energy consumption , 2015 .

[18]  Chien-Hao Wang,et al.  On a hybrid MPPT control scheme to improve energy harvesting performance of traditional two-stage inverters used in photovoltaic systems , 2017 .

[19]  Runsheng Tang,et al.  Optical performance of vertical single-axis tracked solar panels , 2011 .

[20]  Iain MacGill,et al.  Comparative analysis of the variability of fixed and tracking photovoltaic systems , 2014 .

[21]  Tom Markvart,et al.  Stand-alone PV system design: Results using a new sizing approach , 2008 .

[22]  Muharrem Karaaslan,et al.  The analysis on sun tracking and cooling systems for photovoltaic panels , 2013 .

[23]  Llanos Mora-López,et al.  A new model to predict the energy generated by a photovoltaic system connected to the grid in low latitude countries , 2014 .

[24]  Rustu Eke,et al.  Performance comparison of a double-axis sun tracking versus fixed PV system , 2012 .

[25]  Miguel de Simón-Martín,et al.  Sun‐trackers profitability analysis in Spain , 2014 .

[26]  Mehmet Cebeci,et al.  Evaluation of power output for fixed and two-axis tracking PVarrays , 2012 .

[27]  P. Denholm,et al.  Relative performance of tracking versus fixed tilt photovoltaic systems in the USA , 2013 .

[28]  Xiu-Wei Li,et al.  Single-stage and double-stage photovoltaic driven regeneration for liquid desiccant cooling system , 2011 .

[29]  I. Etier,et al.  Energy Yield of Tracking PV Systems in Jordan , 2012 .

[30]  Joe-Air Jiang,et al.  A novel power benefit prediction approach for two‐axis sun‐tracking type photovoltaic systems based on semiconductor theory , 2014 .