Characterizing Charge Structure in Central Argentina Thunderstorms During RELAMPAGO Utilizing a New Charge Layer Polarity Identification Method

A new automated method to retrieve charge layer polarity from flashes, named Chargepol, is presented in this paper. Using data from the NASA Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) deployed during the Remote sensing of Electrification, Lightning, And Mesoscale/microscale Processes with Adaptive Ground Observations (RELAMPAGO) field campaign in Cordoba, Argentina, from November 2018 to April 2019, this method estimates the polarity of vertical charge distributions and their altitudes and thicknesses (or vertical depth) using the very‐high frequency (VHF) source emissions detected by LMAs. When this method is applied to LMA data for extended periods of time, it is capable of inferring a storm's bulk electrical charge structure throughout its life cycle. This method reliably predicted the polarity of charge within which lightning flashes propagated and was validated in comparison to methods that require manual assignment of polarities via visual inspection of VHF lightning sources. Examples of normal and anomalous charge structures retrieved using Chargepol for storms in Central Argentina during RELAMPAGO are presented for the first time. Application of Chargepol to five months of LMA data in Central Argentina and several locations in the United States allowed for the characterization of the charge structure in these regions and for a reliable comparison using the same methodology. About 13.3% of Cordoba thunderstorms were defined by an anomalous charge structure, slightly higher than in Oklahoma (12.5%) and West Texas (11.1%), higher than Alabama (7.3%), and considerably lower than in Colorado (82.6%). Some of the Cordoba anomalous thunderstorms presented enhanced low‐level positive charge, a feature rarely if ever observed in Colorado thunderstorms.

[1]  F. Dominguez,et al.  A Storm Safari in Subtropical South America: Proyecto RELAMPAGO , 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.

[2]  L. Carey,et al.  Observations of Anomalous Charge Structures in Supercell Thunderstorms in the Southeastern United States , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[3]  Bruno L. Medina,et al.  The RELAMPAGO Lightning Mapping Array: Overview and Initial Comparison with the Geostationary Lightning Mapper , 2020, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology.

[4]  W. Lyu,et al.  Initial Leader Properties During the Preliminary Breakdown Processes of Lightning Flashes and Their Associations With Initiation Positions , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[5]  J. Montanyà,et al.  Charge Structure of Two Tropical Thunderstorms in Colombia , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[6]  B. Ancell,et al.  Variations of Thunderstorm Charge Structures in West Texas on 4 June 2012 , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[7]  E. Mansell,et al.  Investigating the Relative Contributions of Charge Deposition and Turbulence in Organizing Charge within a Thunderstorm , 2018, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences.

[8]  S. Rutledge,et al.  Microphysical and Kinematic Processes Associated With Anomalous Charge Structures in Isolated Convection , 2018, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[9]  S. Rutledge,et al.  Investigation of Lightning Flash Locations in Isolated Convection Using LMA Observations , 2018, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[10]  D. MacGorman,et al.  An overview of the 29 May 2012 Kingfisher supercell during DC3 , 2016 .

[11]  J. Montanyà,et al.  Charge structure analysis of a severe hailstorm with predominantly positive cloud-to-ground lightning , 2016 .

[12]  Eric C. Bruning,et al.  Lightning Mapping Array flash detection performance with variable receiver thresholds , 2016, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[13]  S. Rutledge,et al.  Climatological analyses of LMA data with an open‐source lightning flash‐clustering algorithm , 2016 .

[14]  J. Peischl,et al.  The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Campaign , 2015 .

[15]  Eric C. Bruning,et al.  Environmental controls on storm intensity and charge structure in multiple regions of the continental United States , 2015 .

[16]  Retha M. Mecikalski,et al.  Radar and Lightning Observations of Deep Moist Convection across Northern Alabama during DC3: 21 May 2012 , 2015 .

[17]  Robert A. Houze,et al.  Severe convection and lightning in subtropical South America , 2014 .

[18]  Stephanie A. Weiss,et al.  Continuous variability in thunderstorm primary electrification and an evaluation of inverted-polarity terminology , 2014 .

[19]  J. Montanyà,et al.  Asymmetries in bidirectional leader development of lightning flashes , 2013 .

[20]  Richard C. J. Somerville,et al.  Frost flower aerosol effects on Arctic wintertime longwave cloud radiative forcing , 2013 .

[21]  Kristin M. Calhoun,et al.  Evolution of Lightning Activity and Storm Charge Relative to Dual-Doppler Analysis of a High-Precipitation Supercell Storm , 2013 .

[22]  D. Cecil,et al.  Toward a Global Climatology of Severe Hailstorms as Estimated by Satellite Passive Microwave Imagers , 2012 .

[23]  Eric C. Bruning,et al.  Lightning Activity in a Hail-Producing Storm Observed with Phased-Array Radar , 2011 .

[24]  C. Saunders,et al.  Further laboratory investigations into the Relative Diffusional Growth Rate theory of thunderstorm electrification , 2010 .

[25]  W. D. Rust,et al.  Formation of Charge Structures in a Supercell , 2010 .

[26]  W. D. Rust,et al.  Relationships between Lightning Location and Polarimetric Radar Signatures in a Small Mesoscale Convective System , 2009 .

[27]  S. Rutledge,et al.  A Framework for the Statistical Analysis of Large Radar and Lightning Datasets: Results from STEPS 2000 , 2011 .

[28]  Jerry M. Straka,et al.  TELEX: The Thunderstorm Electrification and Lightning Experiment , 2008 .

[29]  W. D. Rust,et al.  Evolving Complex Electrical Structures of the STEPS 25 June 2000 Multicell Storm , 2008 .

[30]  S. Rutledge,et al.  Radar and Lightning Observations of Normal and Inverted Polarity Multicellular Storms from STEPS , 2007 .

[31]  S. Rutledge,et al.  Radar and Lightning Observations of the 3 June 2000 Electrically Inverted Storm from STEPS , 2007 .

[32]  Brad Baker,et al.  The Influence of Diffusional Growth Rates On the Charge Transfer Accompanying Rebounding Collisions Between Ice Crystals and Soft Hailstones , 2007 .

[33]  W. D. Rust,et al.  Electrical and Polarimetric Radar Observations of a Multicell Storm in TELEX , 2007 .

[34]  S. Rutledge,et al.  KINEMATIC, MICROPHYSICAL, AND ELECTRICAL ASPECTS OF AN ASYMMETRIC BOW-ECHO MESOSCALE CONVECTIVE SYSTEM OBSERVED DURING STEPS 2000 , 2006 .

[35]  David P. Yorty,et al.  WHERE ARE THE MOST INTENSE THUNDERSTORMS ON EARTH , 2006 .

[36]  Steven A. Rutledge,et al.  Submitted to: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , 2004 .

[37]  Eric C. Bruning,et al.  The Electrical Structure of Two Supercell Storms during STEPS , 2005 .

[38]  John M. Hall,et al.  The North Alabama Lightning Mapping Array: Recent Severe Storm Observations and Future Prospects , 2005 .

[39]  Eric C. Bruning,et al.  Inverted-polarity electrical structures in thunderstorms in the Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study (STEPS) , 2005 .

[40]  Paul Krehbiel,et al.  Initial leader velocities during intracloud lightning: Possible evidence for a runaway breakdown effect , 2005 .

[41]  Guang-shu Zhang,et al.  The lower positive charge center and its effect on lightning discharges on the Tibetan Plateau , 2005 .

[42]  Steven J. Goodman,et al.  North Alabama Lightning Mapping Array (LMA): VHF Source Retrieval Algorithm and Error Analyses , 2004 .

[43]  A. Kamra,et al.  Evolution of lightning and the possible initiation/triggering of lightning discharges by the lower positive charge center in an isolated thundercloud in the tropics , 2004 .

[44]  P. Krehbiel,et al.  Accuracy of the Lightning Mapping Array , 2003 .

[45]  Lawrence D. Carey,et al.  The Relationship between Severe Storm Reports and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Polarity in the Contiguous United States from 1989 to 1998 , 2003 .

[46]  Timothy J. Lang,et al.  Relationships between Convective Storm Kinematics, Precipitation, and Lightning , 2002 .

[47]  W. D. Rust,et al.  Possibly inverted‐polarity electrical structures in thunderstorms during STEPS , 2002 .

[48]  P. Krehbiel,et al.  Effects of charge and electrostatic potential on lightning propagation , 2001 .

[49]  C. Saunders,et al.  A laboratory study of the influence of water vapour and mixing on the charge transfer process during collisions between ice crystals and graupel , 2001 .

[50]  Richard E. Orville,et al.  Cloud-to-ground lightning in the United States: NLDN results in the first decade, 1989-98 , 2001 .

[51]  C. Saunders,et al.  A laboratory study of graupel charging , 2000 .

[52]  Michael Davis,et al.  GPS‐based mapping system reveals lightning inside storms , 2000 .

[53]  Paul Krehbiel,et al.  A GPS‐based three‐dimensional lightning mapping system: Initial observations in central New Mexico , 1999 .

[54]  R. List,et al.  The Ice Crystal-Graupel Collision Charging Mechanism of Thunderstorm Electrification , 2001 .

[55]  W. D. Rust,et al.  Electrical structure in thunderstorm convective regions: 1. Mesoscale convective systems , 1998 .

[56]  C. Saunders,et al.  Laboratory studies of the influence of the rime accretion rate on charge transfer during crystal/graupel collisions , 1998 .

[57]  C. Saunders,et al.  The effect on thunderstorm charging of the rate of rime accretion by graupel , 1997 .

[58]  Xuan-Min Shao,et al.  The spatial and temporal development of intracloud lightning , 1996 .

[59]  William J. Koshak,et al.  On the retrieval of lightning radio sources from time-of-arrival data , 1996 .

[60]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise , 1996, KDD.

[61]  W. D. Rust,et al.  Electrical structure and updraft speeds in thunderstorms over the southern Great Plains , 1995 .

[62]  V. Mazur,et al.  Common physical processes in natural and artificially triggered lightning , 1993 .

[63]  E. Williams,et al.  Mixed-Phase Microphysics and Cloud Electrification. , 1991 .

[64]  W. D. Keith,et al.  The effect of liquid water on thunderstorm charging , 1991 .

[65]  Earle R. Williams,et al.  The tripole structure of thunderstorms , 1989 .

[66]  James E. Dye,et al.  The electrification of New Mexico thunderstorms: 1. Relationship between precipitation development and the onset of electrification , 1989 .

[67]  William P. Winn,et al.  Observations within two regions of charge during initial thunderstorm electrification , 1988 .

[68]  James E. Dye,et al.  Early electrification and precipitation development in a small, isolated Montana cumulonimbus , 1986 .

[69]  Earle R. Williams,et al.  Large-scale charge separation in thunderclouds , 1985 .

[70]  Roger Lhermitte,et al.  Doppler Radar and Radio Observations of Thunderstorms , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[71]  Tsutomu Takahashi,et al.  Riming Electrification as a Charge Generation Mechanism in Thunderstorms , 1978 .

[72]  Heinz W. Kasemir,et al.  A Contribution to the Electrostatic Theory of a Lightning Discharge , 1960 .