Adaptive Mathematical Model of Tumor Response to Radiotherapy Based on CBCT Data

Mathematical modeling of tumor response to radiotherapy has the potential of enhancing the quality of the treatment plan, which can be even tailored on an individual basis. Lack of extensive in vivo validation has prevented, however, reliable clinical translation of modeling outcomes. Image-guided radiotherapy is a consolidated treatment modality based on computed tomographic (CT) imaging for tumor delineation and volumetric cone beam CT data for periodic checks during treatment. In this study, a macroscopic model of tumor growth and radiation response is proposed, being able to adapt along the treatment course as volumetric tumor data become available. Model parameter learning was based on cone beam CT images in 13 uterine cervical cancer patients, subdivided into three groups (G1, G2, G3) according to tumor type and treatment. Three group-specific parameter sets (PS1, PS2, and PS3) on one general parameter set (PSa) were applied. The corresponding average model fitting errors were 14%, 18%, 13%, and 21%, respectively. The model adaptation testing was performed using volume data of three patients, other than the ones involved in the parameter learning. The extrapolation performance of the general model was improved, while comparable prediction errors were found for the group-specific approach. This suggests that an online parameter tuning can overcome the limitations of a suboptimal patient stratification, which appeared otherwise a critical issue.

[1]  C Marini,et al.  Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[3]  J. Tinsley Oden,et al.  GENERAL DIFFUSE-INTERFACE THEORIES AND AN APPROACH TO PREDICTIVE TUMOR GROWTH MODELING , 2010 .

[4]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Daily online cone beam computed tomography to assess interfractional motion in patients with intact cervical cancer. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  P. Olive,et al.  Radiation Sensitivity , H 2 AX Phosphorylation , and Kinetics of Repair of DNA Strand Breaks in Irradiated Cervical Cancer Cell Lines , 2004 .

[6]  M. Piotrowska,et al.  A simple model of carcinogenic mutations with time delay and diffusion. , 2013, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[7]  K Hendrickson,et al.  Predicting the efficacy of radiotherapy in individual glioblastoma patients in vivo: a mathematical modeling approach , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Marc Garbey,et al.  Modeling cervix cancer growth and response to radiation therapy: A validation study using patient volumetric tumor data , 2014, IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI).

[9]  Pietro Cerveri,et al.  Modeling the Interplay Between Tumor Volume Regression and Oxygenation in Uterine Cervical Cancer During Radiotherapy Treatment , 2016, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[10]  R. Tsang,et al.  Proliferation measurements with flow cytometry Tpot in cancer of the uterine cervix: correlation between two laboratories and preliminary clinical results. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Young-Bin Cho,et al.  Cervical cancer regression measured using weekly magnetic resonance imaging during fractionated radiotherapy: radiobiologic modeling and correlation with tumor hypoxia. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  H. Thames,et al.  Tumor volume: a basic and specific response predictor in radiotherapy. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  Georgios D. Mitsis,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Tumor Growth, Drug-Resistance, Toxicity, and Optimal Therapy Design , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  K. Khanna,et al.  DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[15]  Mischa Hoogeman,et al.  Toward an individualized target motion management for IMRT of cervical cancer based on model-predicted cervix-uterus shape and position. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  M S Hoogeman,et al.  Individualized nonadaptive and online-adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment strategies for cervical cancer patients based on pretreatment acquired variable bladder filling computed tomography scans. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[18]  Pietro Cerveri,et al.  Kinetic Models for Predicting Cervical Cancer Response to Radiation Therapy on Individual Basis Using Tumor Regression Measured In Vivo With Volumetric Imaging , 2016, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[19]  P. Weatherall,et al.  Oxygenation in cervical cancer and normal uterine cervix assessed using blood oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) MRI at 3T , 2012, NMR in biomedicine.

[20]  B. Stewart,et al.  World cancer report 2014. , 2014 .

[21]  A. Nagano,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy based on the daily regression of a tumor in carbon-ion beam irradiation , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  P. Olive,et al.  Radiation Sensitivity, H2AX Phosphorylation, and Kinetics of Repair of DNA Strand Breaks in Irradiated Cervical Cancer Cell Lines , 2004, Cancer Research.

[23]  Nilendu Gupta,et al.  Predicting outcomes in cervical cancer: a kinetic model of tumor regression during radiation therapy. , 2010, Cancer research.

[24]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[25]  R. Mason,et al.  A noninvasive tumor oxygenation imaging strategy using magnetic resonance imaging of endogenous blood and tissue water , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  E. Feuer,et al.  SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 , 2006 .

[27]  Ping Wang,et al.  A Mathematical Model of Tumor Volume Changes during Radiotherapy , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[28]  T. Chan,et al.  A stochastic model for tumor geometry evolution during radiation therapy in cervical cancer. , 2014, Medical physics.

[29]  Norbert M. Graf,et al.  Towards in silico oncology: Adapting a four dimensional nephroblastoma treatment model to a clinical trial case based on multi-method sensitivity analysis , 2012, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[30]  Robert Jeraj,et al.  An imaging-based tumour growth and treatment response model: investigating the effect of tumour oxygenation on radiation therapy response , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  CHRIstINE HaRtING,et al.  Computer simulation of tumour control probabilities after irradiation for varying intrinsic radio-sensitivity using a single cell based model , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[32]  J. Staffurth,et al.  A systematic review of organ motion and image-guided strategies in external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer. , 2014, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[33]  Manolis Tsiknakis,et al.  The Technologically Integrated Oncosimulator: Combining Multiscale Cancer Modeling With Information Technology in the In Silico Oncology Context , 2014, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.