The Implications of Respondent Concurrency on Sex Partner Risk in a National, Web-Based Study of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States

Background: Men who have sex with men (MSM) represent the largest HIV risk group in the United States. Sexual concurrency catalyzes HIV transmission in populations by increasing the indirect exposure of one's sex partners to one another. Although individual-level (egocentric) designs have demonstrated a high prevalence of concurrency among MSM respondents, methods are lacking for understanding the exposure implications for partners (dyads) reported in such studies. Methods: A new technique for manipulating egocentrically collected partnership timing data to measure the degree to which respondents' patterns of concurrency and serial monogamy resulted in the indirect exposure of respondents' partners to other partners was developed. Two outcomes were constructed for each partner: any concurrent or serially monogamous exposure to another partner (any exposure) and any concurrent exposure to another partner, irrespective of serial monogamy (any concurrent exposure). Reports of unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) were incorporated to construct the outcomes of "any UAI exposure" and "any concurrent UAI exposure." This method was applied to an online study of MSM aged ≥18 years, with comparisons made by partner's race–ethnicity, age, type, and meeting location. Results: Among 4060 repeat partners of 2449 MSM, 73% had any exposure in the previous 6 months; 58% had any concurrent exposure. Among UAI partners, 37% had concurrent UAI exposure. Black UAI partners were more likely than whites to have any concurrent UAI exposure [unadjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.34 (1.05 to 1.70)], as were casual UAI partners relative to main partners [unadjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 4.37 (3.58 to 5.35)]. In adjusted models, black UAI partners were significantly more likely to have any UAI exposure, but not concurrent UAI exposure. Casual UAI partners remained more exposed by both outcomes. Conclusions: Sex partners of MSM, particularly casual and black non-Hispanic partners, face a high degree of exposure to other partners.

[1]  P. Sullivan,et al.  Frequency of Sexual Activity With Most Recent Male Partner Among Young, Internet-Using Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States , 2013, Journal of homosexuality.

[2]  A. Oster,et al.  Network Analysis Among HIV-infected Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men Demonstrates High Connectedness Around Few Venues , 2013, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[3]  P. Sullivan,et al.  Measuring Population Transmission Risk for HIV: An Alternative Metric of Exposure Risk in Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in the US , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  Steven M. Goodreau,et al.  What Drives the US and Peruvian HIV Epidemics in Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM)? , 2012, PloS one.

[5]  P. Sullivan,et al.  High Prevalence of Sexual Concurrency and Concurrent Unprotected Anal Intercourse Across Racial/Ethnic Groups Among a National, Web-Based Study of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States , 2012, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[6]  P. Sullivan,et al.  Discussion of HIV Status by Serostatus and Partnership Sexual Risk Among Internet-Using MSM in the United States , 2012, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[7]  C. Hoff,et al.  Relationship Dynamics as Predictors of Broken Agreements About Outside Sexual Partners: Implications for HIV Prevention Among Gay Couples , 2012, AIDS and Behavior.

[8]  T. Hart,et al.  Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: a meta-analysis , 2012, The Lancet.

[9]  B. Maughan-Brown.  Variation in Concurrent Sexual Partnerships and Sexually Transmitted Diseases Among African Men in Cape Town, South Africa , 2012, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[10]  K. Holmes,et al.  A Comparison of Sexual Behavior Patterns Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and Heterosexual Men and Women , 2012, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[11]  M. Morris,et al.  Lack of association between concurrency and HIV infection: an artifact of study design. , 2012, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[12]  Martina Morris,et al.  Concurrent Partnerships, Acute Infection and HIV Epidemic Dynamics Among Young Adults in Zimbabwe , 2012, AIDS and Behavior.

[13]  Elizabeth A. Sully,et al.  Extraspousal Partnerships in a Community in Rural Uganda With High HIV Prevalence: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study Using Linked Spousal Data , 2011, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[14]  R. Wiegand,et al.  Understanding disparities in HIV infection between black and white MSM in the United States , 2011, AIDS.

[15]  Jeffrey W. Eaton,et al.  Concurrent Sexual Partnerships and Primary HIV Infection: A Critical Interaction , 2011, AIDS and Behavior.

[16]  Patrick S Sullivan,et al.  Number of casual male sexual partners and associated factors among men who have sex with men: Results from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system , 2011, BMC public health.

[17]  Martina Morris,et al.  Timing Is Everything: International Variations in Historical Sexual Partnership Concurrency and HIV Prevalence , 2010, PloS one.

[18]  R. Baggaley,et al.  Infectiousness of HIV-infected homosexual men in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. , 2010, AIDS.

[19]  Marie-Claude Boily,et al.  HIV transmission risk through anal intercourse: systematic review, meta-analysis and implications for HIV prevention , 2010, International journal of epidemiology.

[20]  James P. Hughes,et al.  Acyclovir and transmission of HIV-1 from persons infected with HIV-1 and HSV-2. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  S. Aral.  Partner Concurrency and the STD/HIV Epidemic , 2010, Current infectious disease reports.

[22]  Samantha Rosenthal,et al.  Concurrent Partnerships as a Driver of the HIV Epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa? The Evidence is Limited , 2010, AIDS and Behavior.

[23]  M. Morris.  Barking up the Wrong Evidence Tree. Comment on Lurie & Rosenthal, “Concurrent Partnerships as a Driver of the HIV Epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa? The Evidence is Limited” , 2009, AIDS and Behavior.

[24]  W. Mcfarland,et al.  Concurrent sexual partnerships and racial disparities in HIV infection among men who have sex with men , 2009, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[25]  Ronald O. Valdiserri,et al.  Unequal Opportunity: Health Disparities Affecting Gay and Bisexual Men in the United States , 2009 .

[26]  Martina Morris,et al.  Concurrent partnerships and HIV prevalence disparities by race: linking science and public health practice. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[27]  P. Sullivan,et al.  Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities , 2009, AIDS.

[28]  W. Mcfarland,et al.  Racial Mixing and HIV Risk Among Men Who Have Sex with Men , 2009, AIDS and Behavior.

[29]  Irene A. Doherty,et al.  Condom Use and Duration of Concurrent Partnerships Among Men in the United States , 2009, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[30]  P. Sullivan,et al.  HIV Infection among Gay and Bisexual Men , 2007 .

[31]  R. Bakeman,et al.  Explaining disparities in HIV infection among black and white men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis of HIV risk behaviors , 2007, AIDS.

[32]  Irene A. Doherty,et al.  Concurrent sexual partnerships among men in the United States. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[33]  R. Jewkes,et al.  Factors associated with HIV sero-positivity in young, rural South African men. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[34]  R. Wolitski,et al.  Greater risk for HIV infection of black men who have sex with men: a critical literature review. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[35]  Lisa M. Lee,et al.  Validation of race/ethnicity and transmission mode in the US HIV/AIDS reporting system. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[36]  N. Harawa,et al.  The effect of partner characteristics on HIV infection among African American men who have sex with men in the Young Men's Survey, Los Angeles, 1999-2000. , 2003, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[37]  E. Lagarde,et al.  Concurrent sexual partnerships and HIV prevalence in five urban communities of sub-Saharan Africa , 2001, AIDS.

[38]  E. Vittinghoff,et al.  Per-contact risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission between male sexual partners. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[39]  H. Haverkos,et al.  The social organization of sexuality. , 1995, JAMA.

[40]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[41]  David Ostrow,et al.  Network mixing and network influences most linked to HIV infection and risk behavior in the HIV epidemic among black men who have sex with men. , 2013, American journal of public health.

[42]  T. Finlayson,et al.  Prevalence and awareness of HIV infection among men who have sex with men --- 21 cities, United States, 2008. , 2010, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[43]  G. Perry,et al.  Using "socially assigned race" to probe white advantages in health status. , 2008, Ethnicity & disease.