Joint Within-Class Collaborative Representation for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Representation-based classification has gained great interest recently. In this paper, we extend our previous work in collaborative representation-based classification to spatially joint versions. This is due to the fact that neighboring pixels tend to belong to the same class with high probability. Specifically, neighboring pixels near the test pixel are simultaneously represented via a joint collaborative model of linear combinations of labeled samples, and the weights for representation are estimated by an ℓ2-minimization derived closed-form solution. Experimental results confirm that the proposed joint within-class collaborative representation outperforms other state-of-the-art techniques, such as joint sparse representation and support vector machines with composite kernels.

[1]  Saeid Homayouni,et al.  An Approach for Subpixel Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Images , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  SVM- and MRF-Based Method for Accurate Classification of Hyperspectral Images , 2010, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[3]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  An SVM Ensemble Approach Combining Spectral, Structural, and Semantic Features for the Classification of High-Resolution Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Saurabh Prasad,et al.  Locality Preserving Genetic Algorithms for Spatial-Spectral Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Gustavo Camps-Valls,et al.  Composite kernels for hyperspectral image classification , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Sparse representation or collaborative representation: Which helps face recognition? , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[7]  Gabriele Moser,et al.  Combining Support Vector Machines and Markov Random Fields in an Integrated Framework for Contextual Image Classification , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Xin Huang,et al.  A comparative study of spatial approaches for urban mapping using hyperspectral ROSIS images over Pavia City, northern Italy , 2009 .

[9]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse solutions to linear inverse problems with multiple measurement vectors , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  James E. Fowler,et al.  Locality-Preserving Dimensionality Reduction and Classification for Hyperspectral Image Analysis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Kai Feng,et al.  Optimized Laplacian SVM With Distance Metric Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Qian Du,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Hyperspectral Dimensionality Reduction for Urban Land Cover Classification , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Algorithms for simultaneous sparse approximation. Part I: Greedy pursuit , 2006, Signal Process..

[14]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles , 2008, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[15]  LinLin Shen,et al.  Three-Dimensional Gabor Wavelets for Pixel-Based Hyperspectral Imagery Classification , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Trac D. Tran,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification via Kernel Sparse Representation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  James E. Fowler,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Gaussian Mixture Models and Markov Random Fields , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[18]  Fuan Tsai,et al.  Feature Extraction of Hyperspectral Image Cubes Using Three-Dimensional Gray-Level Cooccurrence , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  Qian Du,et al.  Gabor-Filtering-Based Nearest Regularized Subspace for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Peter Bajorski,et al.  Target Detection Under Misspecified Models in Hyperspectral Images , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[21]  James E. Fowler,et al.  Locality-Preserving Discriminant Analysis in Kernel-Induced Feature Spaces for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[22]  Liangpei Zhang,et al.  An Adaptive Mean-Shift Analysis Approach for Object Extraction and Classification From Urban Hyperspectral Imagery , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Jun Zhou,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Structured Sparse Logistic Regression and Three-Dimensional Wavelet Texture Features , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  Trac D. Tran,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Dictionary-Based Sparse Representation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  Trac D. Tran,et al.  Sparse Representation for Target Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[26]  James E. Fowler,et al.  Nearest Regularized Subspace for Hyperspectral Classification , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.