Get up and go test in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE To determine the reliability, minimum detectable change (MDC), and validity of the Get Up and Go (GUG) test. DESIGN Repeated-measures test-retest for reliability. Correlational study for validity. SETTING Institutional practice. PARTICIPANTS Convenience sample of 130 people, 105 with knee osteoarthritis (OA) (80 women; mean age, 62+/-9 y) and 25 healthy controls (21 women; mean age, 57+/-8 y). INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. Main outcome measures Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the Activity of Daily Living Scale of the Knee Outcome Survey, and the 8 scales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. RESULTS Intratester and intertester reliability was.95 (95% confidence interval [CI],.72-.98) and.98 (95% CI,.94-.99), respectively. The MDC, based on measurements by a single tester and between testers, was 1.5 and 1.2 seconds, respectively. Time to perform the GUG test was longer for persons with knee OA than it was for the controls (mean difference, 3.3s; 95% CI, 1.8-4.9). Correlations between the GUG test and measures of physical function did not differ significantly from correlations between the GUG test and measures that do not specifically evaluate physical function. CONCLUSIONS The GUG test is reliable and has an MDC that is adequate for clinical use. Validity of the GUG test as a single measure of physical function was not supported. Further research should include testing a battery of performance-based measures of physical function.

[1]  R. Moskowitz,et al.  Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. , 1986, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[2]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Four Knee Outcome Scales for Athletic Patients , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[4]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[5]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  The effect of chronic diseases on physical function. Comparison between activities of daily living scales and the Physical Performance Test. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[7]  M. Hurley,et al.  Sensorimotor changes and functional performance in patients with knee osteoarthritis , 1997, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[8]  P. Shrout.  Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry , 1998, Statistical methods in medical research.

[9]  K Bandeen-Roche,et al.  Preclinical mobility disability predicts incident mobility disability in older women. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[10]  David Steven Scott,et al.  Improvements in quadriceps sensorimotor function and disability of patients with knee osteoarthritis following a clinically practicable exercise regime. , 1998, British journal of rheumatology.

[11]  C. McHorney,et al.  The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs , 1993, Medical care.

[12]  Jh. Kellgren.  Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis , 1957 .

[13]  W. Applegate,et al.  A randomized trial comparing aerobic exercise and resistance exercise with a health education program in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The Fitness Arthritis and Seniors Trial (FAST). , 1997, JAMA.

[14]  Joseph J. Pedulla.  National Council on Measurement in Education , 1984 .

[15]  R. Hays,et al.  Measuring Physical Function in Community‐Dwelling Older Persons: A Comparison of Self‐Administered, Interviewer‐Administered, and Performance‐Based Measures , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[16]  A M Jette,et al.  Exercise--it's never too late: the strong-for-life program. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[17]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. , 1994 .

[18]  A. Davis,et al.  The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  R. Epstein,et al.  Interpretation of quality of life changes , 1993, Quality of Life Research.

[20]  J D Williamson,et al.  Functional decline in older adults: expanding methods of ascertainment. , 1996, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[21]  G. E. Gresham,et al.  Effects of a quantitative progressive rehabilitation program applied unilaterally to the osteoarthritic knee. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  B Kirshner,et al.  A methodological framework for assessing health indices. , 1985, Journal of chronic diseases.

[23]  J. Esdaile,et al.  Functional disability scales for back pain. , 1995, Spine.

[24]  M J Graney,et al.  Comparison of subjective ratings of function with observed functional ability of frail older persons. , 1991, American journal of public health.

[25]  G. Samsa,et al.  Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  N C Dunham,et al.  Measurement of Activities of Daily Living in Hospitalized Elderly: A Comparison of Self‐Report and Performance‐Based Methods , 1992, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[27]  J. VanSwearingen,et al.  Identifying early decline of physical function in community-dwelling older women: performance-based and self-report measures. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[28]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties? , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  M. E. Cress,et al.  Relationship Between Physical Performance and Self‐Perceived Physical Function , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[30]  David Steven Scott,et al.  Exercise can reverse quadriceps sensorimotor dysfunction that is associated with rheumatoid arthritis without exacerbating disease activity. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[31]  H. Merrifield.  Exercise: It's Never Too Late , 1996 .

[32]  R. Altman,et al.  Criteria for classification of clinical osteoarthritis. , 1991, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[33]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Development of a Patient-Reported Measure of Function of the Knee* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[34]  L. Portney,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research , 1993 .

[35]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 Health Survey Update , 2000, Spine.

[36]  F D Wolinsky,et al.  Identifying meaningful intra-individual change standards for health-related quality of life measures. , 2000, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[37]  D. Felson.  The epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis: results from the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. , 1990, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.