The relationship between performance of submerged hollow fibers and bubble-induced phenomena examined by particle image velocimetry

Aeration is used in many membrane processes, especially in submerged membrane bio-reactors (MBRs). In order to reduce the costs of operation, it is important to optimize the bubble size and frequency. For a given airflow rate, it is possible to have many small bubbles at a high frequency, or a few larger bubbles at a lower frequency. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of bubbling flow on the performance of tight and loose submerged fibers. Parameters varied included the bubble size, bubble frequency, degree of looseness and the channel width. Particle image velocimetry was used to observe liquid flow patterns and measure the surface shear stresses as well as characterize the movement of the hollow fibers. Filtration behavior was examined for a model bentonite suspension at constant flux by monitoring transmembrane pressure (TMP) rise. For tight fibers, it was found that similar rates of increase of TMP can be achieved by using up to 10 times less air if small bubbles are used at a higher frequency. The reason for this was that although smaller bubbles produced a lower average shear stress, the fluctuations in the shear stress (characterized by the standard deviation) was a key factor in improving performance. The performance of the fiber was enhanced when a degree of looseness was allowed. For loose fibers, it was also found that using smaller bubbles at high frequency could provide the same performance at lower airflow rates. There was an optimum looseness for a single fiber when bubbling was applied. The bubble-induced phenomena that controlled performance for loose fibers appeared to be a combination of fiber acceleration and the standard deviation of the shear stress.

[1]  Kazuo Yamamoto,et al.  Household Membrane Bioreactor in Domestic Wastewater Treatment , 1993 .

[2]  Tatsuki Ueda,et al.  Effects of aeration on suction pressure in a submerged membrane bioreactor , 1997 .

[3]  Delphine Meunier,et al.  Realization and simulation of wall shear stress integrated sensors , 2003, Microelectron. J..

[4]  Pascal Jaouen,et al.  Hydrodynamics study in a plane ultrafiltration module using an electrochemical method and particle image velocimetry visualization , 2002 .

[5]  Corinne Cabassud,et al.  Air sparging with flat sheet nanofiltration: a link between wall shear stresses and flux enhancement☆ , 2002 .

[6]  C. Trägårdh,et al.  Particle transport in crossflow microfiltration – I. Effects of hydrodynamics and diffusion , 1999 .

[7]  Vicki Chen,et al.  Fibre movement induced by bubbling using submerged hollow fibre membranes , 2006 .

[8]  L. Labraga,et al.  Characterization of low-speed streaks in the near-wall region of a turbulent boundary layer , 2004 .

[9]  C. Cabassud,et al.  Air sparging for flux enhancement in nanofiltration membranes: application to O/W stabilised and non-stabilised emulsions , 2002 .

[10]  El Hani Bouhabila,et al.  Microfiltration of activated sludge using submerged membrane with air bubbling (application to wastewater treatment) , 1998 .

[11]  Pierre R. Bérubé,et al.  The effect of hydrodynamic conditions and system configurations on the permeate flux in a submerged hollow fiber membrane system , 2006 .

[12]  Adrian Wing-Keung Law,et al.  Factors affecting the performance of a submerged hollow fiber bundle , 2006 .

[13]  C. Colin,et al.  Experimental study of bubble injection in a turbulent boundary layer , 2002 .

[14]  Megat Johari Megat Mohd Noor,et al.  Treatment of high strength industrial wastewater using extended aeration-immersed microfiltration (EAM) process , 2002 .

[15]  Gun Trägårdh,et al.  Particle transport in crossflow microfiltration – II. Effects of particle–particle interactions , 1999 .

[16]  A. Fane,et al.  The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes , 2003 .