Coping with Unfair Treatment at Work – What Is the Relationship between Coping and Hypertension in Middle-Aged Men and Women?

Background: An important hypothesis in psychosomatic medicine is that exposure to psychosocial factors that arouse anger may accelerate the onset of hypertension, particularly if the subject is not allowed to show anger or to deal constructively with the factor that evoked it. For working men and women, being treated in an unfair way at work may be crucial. The present study was designed to answer the question whether the pattern of coping – primarily directed towards the aggressor (open) or directed inwards or towards others (covert) – is associated with hypertension among working men and women. Study group: Five thousand seven hundred and twenty working men and women aged 15–64 participated in the study. The participation rate was 76%. Methods: The coping pattern was studied by means of a Swedish version of a self-administered questionnaire that was originally introduced by Harburg et al. Results: Significant results were confined to the age group 45–54. All analyses were adjusted for age and body mass index. Smoking habits and social class had no effect on the relationships. Low scores (lowest quartile) for open coping tended to be associated with an elevated prevalence ratio (PR) of hypertension both among men (PR 1.3, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.9–1.7) and women (PR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–2.0). High scores for covert coping (highest quartile) were associated with an elevated PR of hypertension among men (PR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2–2.2) but not in women. If the analysis was confined to cases without medication, the relationship between a high level of covert coping and high blood pressure was still significant for men. For women, however, no significant findings were made after this operation. Accordingly, the relationship between a low level of open coping and hypertension in women was confined to women with medication. Coping patterns were correlated with psychosocial work environment factors, in particular decision latitude. Conclusion: In men, covert coping was associated with prevalence of hypertension. In women, there tended to be a relationship between low scores for open coping and hypertension.

[1]  L. Alfredsson,et al.  High effort, low reward, and cardiovascular risk factors in employed Swedish men and women: baseline results from the WOLF Study. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[2]  M. Borres,et al.  Psychosomatic and Psychosocial Symptoms Are Associated with Low Blood Pressure in Swedish Schoolchildren , 1998, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[3]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Current issues relating to psychosocial job strain and cardiovascular disease research. , 1998, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[4]  T. Shimomitsu,et al.  Intraindividual relationships between blood pressure level and emotional state. , 1996, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.

[5]  H. Deter,et al.  Preliminary results of a differentiated emotion-stimulating interview in patients with essential hypertension as compared with inpatients of a psychosomatic unit and normal controls. , 1996, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.

[6]  H. Berenbaum,et al.  Alexithymia, anger, and interpersonal behavior. , 1996, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.

[7]  J. Schwartz,et al.  AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING FOR EVALUATING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LIFESTYLE, HYPERTENSION AND CARDIOVASCULAR RISK , 1995, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[8]  S. Knardahl,et al.  A double-blind study of psychosocial factors in 40-year-old women with essential hypertension. , 1995, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.

[9]  T. Patterson,et al.  Effects of chronic stress on beta‐adrenergic receptors in the homeless. , 1994, Psychosomatic medicine.

[10]  P. Landsbergis,et al.  Job strain and cardiovascular disease. , 1994, Annual review of public health.

[11]  T. Theorell,et al.  Influence of job strain and emotion on blood pressure in female hospital personnel during workhours. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[12]  O. Ekeberg,et al.  Awareness of high blood pressure influences on psychological and sympathetic responses. , 1992, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[13]  D. Waller,et al.  Emotional coping and the psychophysiological substrates of elevated blood pressure. , 1988, Behavioral medicine.

[14]  B. Houston,et al.  Family history of hypertension, personality patterns, and cardiovascular reactivity to stress. , 1986, Psychosomatic medicine.

[15]  D. Waller,et al.  The relation of social support and working environment to medical variables associated with elevated blood pressure in young males: a structural model. , 1985, Social science & medicine.

[16]  P. Wilton.  BLOOD PRESSURE IN SWEDISH SCHOOL CHILDREN , 1983, Acta paediatrica Scandinavica.

[17]  R B Haynes,et al.  Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  O. Miettinen,et al.  Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. , 1976, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  B M Slaney,et al.  Healthy at work? , 1970, Nursing times.

[20]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.