Syntactic frame and verb bias in aphasia: Plausibility judgments of undergoer-subject sentences

[1]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments , 1964 .

[2]  Yves Joanette,et al.  FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE , 1996 .

[3]  A. Kertesz.  The Western Aphasia Battery , 1982 .

[4]  Harold Goodglass,et al.  1 – Is Agrammatism a Unitary Phenomenon?* , 1985 .

[5]  S. Sasanuma,et al.  The role of empathy in sentence production: A functional analysis of aphasic and normal elicited narratives in Japanese and English , 1999 .

[6]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  Verb Subcategorization Frequency Differences between Business- News and Balanced Corpora: The Role of Verb Sense , 2000, ACL 2000.

[7]  J. Kegl,et al.  Levels of Representation and Units of Access Relevant to Agrammatism , 1995, Brain and Language.

[8]  J. Swets.  The Relative Operating Characteristic in Psychology , 1973, Science.

[9]  S. Gahl.  A Usage-based Model of Aphasic Sentence Comprehension , 2000 .

[10]  S. Sasanuma,et al.  The Interaction of Preserved Pragmatics and Impaired Syntax in Japanese and English Aphasic Speech , 1998, Brain and Language.

[11]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Brain and cognition , 1989 .

[12]  Rita Sloan Berndt,et al.  Comprehension of reversible sentences in “agrammatism”: a meta-analysis , 1996, Cognition.

[13]  J. Grier,et al.  Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  It's Time to Face a Simple Question: Why Is Canonical Form Simple? , 2000, Brain and Language.

[15]  A. Friederici,et al.  Comprehension in aphasia: A cross-linguistic study , 1987, Brain and Language.