Symmetric Explanation Learning: Effective Dynamic Symmetry Handling for SAT
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ian P. Gent,et al. Symmetry Breaking in Constraint Programming , 2000, ECAI.
[2] Holger Hermanns,et al. Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning , 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[3] Sharad Malik,et al. Chaff: engineering an efficient SAT solver , 2001, Proceedings of the 38th Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37232).
[4] Maurice Bruynooghe,et al. Improved Static Symmetry Breaking for SAT , 2016, SAT.
[5] Ashish Sabharwal. SymChaff: exploiting symmetry in a structure-aware satisfiability solver , 2008, Constraints.
[6] Niklas Sörensson,et al. An Extensible SAT-solver , 2003, SAT.
[7] Lakhdar Sais,et al. Tractability through symmetries in propositional calculus , 1994, Journal of Automated Reasoning.
[8] Igor L. Markov,et al. Symmetry and Satisfiability: An Update , 2010, SAT.
[9] Tarek Nabhani,et al. Dynamic symmetry breaking in the satisfiability problem , 2010 .
[10] Igor L. Markov,et al. Solving difficult SAT instances in the presence of symmetry , 2002, Proceedings 2002 Design Automation Conference (IEEE Cat. No.02CH37324).
[11] James M. Crawford,et al. Symmetry-Breaking Predicates for Search Problems , 1996, KR.
[12] Eliezer L. Lozinskii,et al. The Good Old Davis-Putnam Procedure Helps Counting Models , 2011, J. Artif. Intell. Res..
[13] Christopher Mears,et al. Symmetry Propagation: Improved Dynamic Symmetry Breaking in SAT , 2012, 2012 IEEE 24th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.
[14] Armin Haken,et al. The Intractability of Resolution , 1985, Theor. Comput. Sci..
[15] Bart Demoen,et al. Lightweight dynamic symmetry breaking , 2014, Constraints.
[16] Armin Biere. Preprocessing and Inprocessing Techniques in SAT , 2011, Haifa Verification Conference.
[17] Balakrishnan Krishnamurthy. Short proofs for tricky formulas , 2004, Acta Informatica.
[18] Brendan D. McKay,et al. Practical graph isomorphism, II , 2013, J. Symb. Comput..
[19] Petteri Kaski,et al. Engineering an Efficient Canonical Labeling Tool for Large and Sparse Graphs , 2007, ALENEX.
[20] Toby Walsh,et al. Symmetry Breaking Constraints: Recent Results , 2012, AAAI.
[21] Igor L. Markov,et al. Dynamic symmetry-breaking for Boolean satisfiability , 2009, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.
[22] Igor L. Markov,et al. Efficient symmetry breaking for Boolean satisfiability , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Computers.
[23] Armin Biere,et al. Effective Preprocessing in SAT Through Variable and Clause Elimination , 2005, SAT.
[24] J. P. Marques,et al. GRASP : A Search Algorithm for Propositional Satisfiability , 1999 .
[25] Marijn J. H. Heule,et al. CNF Symmetry Breaking Options in Conflict Driven SAT Solving , 2005 .
[26] Adnan Darwiche,et al. On the power of clause-learning SAT solvers as resolution engines , 2011, Artif. Intell..
[27] Niklas Een,et al. MiniSat v1.13 - A SAT Solver with Conflict-Clause Minimization , 2005 .
[28] Marijn J. H. Heule,et al. Dynamic Symmetry Breaking by Simulating Zykov Contraction , 2009, SAT.
[29] Gilles Audemard,et al. Predicting Learnt Clauses Quality in Modern SAT Solvers , 2009, IJCAI.
[30] Richard Ostrowski,et al. Enhancing Clause Learning by Symmetry in SAT Solvers , 2010, 2010 22nd IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.