Venture capitalists' selection process: the case of biotechnology proposals

The paper analyses venture capitalists' (VCs) selection process in biotechnology ventures. Biotech ventures operate in an extremely risky environment making this an interesting research setting. The majority of venture capitalists exclude certain biotech sectors ex-ante because of regulatory uncertainty, the long development process to a market-ready product and the difficulty to understand the technology. The more thorough due diligence process focuses on financial, market and technology criteria. Management team capabilities are more important for later stage investors, whereas early stage investors expect to have an impact on the future recruiting of professional managers. Despite the higher risk of biotech investments, we find no evidence that VCs require higher hurdle rates or more complete contracts for these investments, compared to investments in other technology-based companies. The most important reason for not reaching an investment agreement is disagreement over valuation, due to large differences in risk perception between entrepreneurs and venture capitalists and the lack of a standard valuation tool for biotech projects.

[1]  O. Hart Corporate Governance: Some Theory and Implications , 1995 .

[2]  John D. Hey,et al.  Experimental Economics and the Theory of Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty , 2002 .

[3]  Vance H. Fried,et al.  Toward a Model of Venture Capital Investment Decision Making , 1994 .

[4]  Per Strömberg,et al.  Characteristics, Contracts, and Actions: Evidence from Venture Capitalist Analyses , 2002 .

[5]  Per Strömberg,et al.  Financial Contracting Theory Meets the Real World: An Empirical Analysis of Venture Capital Contracts , 2000 .

[6]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information , 1981 .

[7]  Edgar Norton,et al.  Specialization versus diversification as a venture capital investment strategy , 1993 .

[8]  Mario Vanhoucke,et al.  A comparison of different project duration forecasting methods using earned value metrics , 2006 .

[9]  Nikhil P. Varaiya,et al.  Anne Evans: Assessment of a Biotechnology Market Opportunity , 2003 .

[10]  Manju Puri,et al.  Venture Capital and the Professionalization of Start-Up Firms: Empirical Evidence , 2000 .

[11]  Sophie Manigart,et al.  Financing High Technology Startups in Belgium: An Explorative Study , 1997 .

[12]  Sue Birley,et al.  Trade-offs in the investment decisons of European venture capitalists , 1996 .

[13]  Tyzoon T. Tyebjee,et al.  A Model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activity , 1984 .

[14]  Mike Wright,et al.  Do UK venture capitalists still have a bias against investment in new technology firms , 2002 .

[15]  G. Poels,et al.  Faculteit Economie En Bedrijfskunde Hoveniersberg 24 B-9000 Gent Working Paper Measuring User Beliefs and Attitudes towards Conceptual Models: a Factor and Structural Equation Model Measuring User Beliefs and Attitudes towards Conceptual Models: a Factor and Structural Equation Model , 2022 .

[16]  P. Everaert,et al.  Outsourcing bij Vlaamse Ondernemingen: een Exploratief Onderzoek , 2005 .

[17]  Jacqueline Senker,et al.  Biotechnology and Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[18]  Garry D. Bruton,et al.  An institutional view of China's venture capital industry Explaining the differences between China and the West , 2003 .

[19]  Mike Wright,et al.  Venture Capital and Private Equity: A Review and Synthesis , 1998 .

[20]  Raphael Amit,et al.  WHY DO VENTURE CAPITAL FIRMS EXIST? THEORY AND CANADIAN EVIDENCE , 1998 .

[21]  Luigi Guiso,et al.  High-Tech Firms and Credit Rationing , 1998 .

[22]  G. Meyer,et al.  The potential of actuarial decision models: Can they improve the venture capital investment decision? , 2000 .

[23]  K. Schoors,et al.  Bank Supervision Russian Style: Rules Versus Enforcement and Tacit Objectives , 2005 .

[24]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  Selection Behavior of Early Stage High Technology Investors: A Pan-European Study , 2006 .

[26]  S. Prowse,et al.  Angel investors and the market for angel investments , 1998 .

[27]  B. Clarysse,et al.  THE IMPRINTING EFFECT OF INITIAL RESOURCES AND MARKET STRATEGY ON THE EARLY GROWTH PATH OF START-UPS. , 2005 .

[28]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Criteria Used by Venture Capitalists to Evaluate New Venture Proposals , 1985 .

[29]  Mark van Osnabrugge A comparison of business angel and venture capitalist investment procedures: An agency theory-based analysis , 2000 .

[30]  Peter Brierley,et al.  The Financing of Technology-Based Small Firms: A Review of the Literature , 2005 .

[31]  Julian Lange,et al.  Valuing high growth potential companies: an international comparison of practices by leading venture capitalists and underwriters , 2001 .

[32]  Gordon Murray,et al.  Have UK venture capitalists a bias against investment in new technology-based firms? , 1995 .