Modeling signaling networks using high-throughput phospho-proteomics.

Cellular communication and information processing is performed by complex, dynamic, and context specific signaling networks. Mathematical modeling is a very useful tool to make sense of this complexity. Building a model relies on two main ingredients: data and an adequate model formalism. In the case of signaling networks, we build mainly upon data at the proteome level, in particular about the phosphorylation of proteins. In this chapter we review recent developments in both data acquisition and computational analysis. We describe two approaches, antibody based technologies and mass spectrometry (MS), along with their main features and limitations. We then go on to describe some model formalisms that have been applied to such high-throughput phospho-proteomics data sets. We consider a variety of formalisms from clustering and data mining approaches to differential equation-based mechanistic models, rule-based, and logic based models, and on through Bayesian network inference and linear regressions.

[1]  Timothy D. Veenstra,et al.  AN ACCURATE MASS TAG STRATEGY FOR QUANTITATIVE AND HIGH THROUGHPUT PROTEOME MEASUREMENTS , 2002 .

[2]  R. Linding,et al.  Simplistic pathways or complex networks? , 2010, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[3]  Patrick G. A. Pedrioli,et al.  Phosphoproteomic Analysis Reveals Interconnected System-Wide Responses to Perturbations of Kinases and Phosphatases in Yeast , 2010, Science Signaling.

[4]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  A Systems Model of Signaling Identifies a Molecular Basis Set for Cytokine-Induced Apoptosis , 2005, Science.

[5]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Input–output behavior of ErbB signaling pathways as revealed by a mass action model trained against dynamic data , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[6]  Charlotte Harrison High-content screening: Integrating information , 2008, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[7]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  A Compendium of Signals and Responses Triggered by Prodeath and Prosurvival Cytokines*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[8]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Signaling through receptors and scaffolds: independent interactions reduce combinatorial complexity. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[9]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Discrete logic modelling as a means to link protein signalling networks with functional analysis of mammalian signal transduction , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  M. Mann,et al.  Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  R. Shamir,et al.  Refinement and expansion of signaling pathways: the osmotic response network in yeast. , 2007, Genome research.

[12]  Rune Linding,et al.  Roles of “junk phosphorylation” in modulating biomolecular association of phosphorylated proteins? , 2010, Cell cycle.

[13]  O. Jensen Interpreting the protein language using proteomics , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[14]  K. Sachs,et al.  Causal Protein-Signaling Networks Derived from Multiparameter Single-Cell Data , 2005, Science.

[15]  S. Le,et al.  Sequence signatures and mRNA concentration can explain two-thirds of protein abundance variation in a human cell line , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[16]  James R Faeder,et al.  Efficient modeling, simulation and coarse-graining of biological complexity with NFsim , 2011, Nature Methods.

[17]  M. Mann,et al.  The abc's (and xyz's) of peptide sequencing , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[18]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  A domain-oriented approach to the reduction of combinatorial complexity in signal transduction networks , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[19]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Cell-Specific Information Processing in Segregating Populations of Eph Receptor Ephrin–Expressing Cells , 2009, Science.

[20]  F. White,et al.  Quantifying oncogenic phosphotyrosine signaling networks through systems biology. , 2010, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[21]  C. Sander,et al.  Models from experiments: combinatorial drug perturbations of cancer cells , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[22]  Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al.  Interpretation of Shotgun Proteomic Data , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[23]  Chaoyang Zhang,et al.  Comparison of probabilistic Boolean network and dynamic Bayesian network approaches for inferring gene regulatory networks , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[24]  S. Kauffman Homeostasis and Differentiation in Random Genetic Control Networks , 1969, Nature.

[25]  Rainer Spang,et al.  Inferring cellular networks – a review , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[26]  Boris N Kholodenko,et al.  Endocytosis and signalling: A meeting with mathematics , 2009, Molecular oncology.

[27]  Leonidas G Alexopoulos,et al.  Setting the Standards for Signal Transduction Research , 2011, Science Signaling.

[28]  B. A. Ballif,et al.  ATM and ATR Substrate Analysis Reveals Extensive Protein Networks Responsive to DNA Damage , 2007, Science.

[29]  P. Bastiaens,et al.  Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[30]  Chris Wiggins,et al.  ARACNE: An Algorithm for the Reconstruction of Gene Regulatory Networks in a Mammalian Cellular Context , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[31]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Rule-Based Modelling of Cellular Signalling , 2007, CONCUR.

[32]  Markus Brosch,et al.  Scoring and Validation of Tandem MS Peptide Identification Methods , 2010, Proteome Bioinformatics.

[33]  M. Mann,et al.  Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, SILAC, as a Simple and Accurate Approach to Expression Proteomics* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[34]  Scott D. Tanner,et al.  Multiplex bio-assay with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: Towards a massively multivariate single-cell technology , 2007 .

[35]  Florian Markowetz,et al.  How to Understand the Cell by Breaking It: Network Analysis of Gene Perturbation Screens , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[36]  Kristen M. Naegle,et al.  PTMScout, a Web Resource for Analysis of High Throughput Post-translational Proteomics Studies* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[37]  Mark W. Schmidt,et al.  Causal learning without DAGs , 2008, NIPS Causality: Objectives and Assessment.

[38]  B. Palsson,et al.  Towards genome-scale signalling-network reconstructions , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Applying mass spectrometry-based proteomics to genetics, genomics and network biology , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  Sach Mukherjee,et al.  Network inference using informative priors , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Advances in proteomic workflows for systems biology. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[42]  Forest M White,et al.  Quantitative analysis of EGFRvIII cellular signaling networks reveals a combinatorial therapeutic strategy for glioblastoma , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Nikolaj Blom,et al.  Phospho.ELM: A database of experimentally verified phosphorylation sites in eukaryotic proteins , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[44]  Matthew R. Clutter,et al.  Fluorescent Cell Barcoding for Multiplex Flow Cytometry , 2011, Current protocols in cytometry.

[45]  Nigel W. Hardy,et al.  Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[46]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  High‐Throughput Protein‐Based Technologies and Computational Models for Drug Development, Efficacy, and Toxicity , 2008 .

[47]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Systems Analysis of EGF Receptor Signaling Dynamics with Micro-Western Arrays , 2010, Nature Methods.

[48]  B. Kholodenko Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[49]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  Flexible informatics for linking experimental data to mathematical models via DataRail , 2008, Bioinform..

[50]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  Training Signaling Pathway Maps to Biochemical Data with Constrained Fuzzy Logic: Quantitative Analysis of Liver Cell Responses to Inflammatory Stimuli , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Physicochemical modelling of cell signalling pathways , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[52]  Lennart Martens,et al.  A guide to the Proteomics Identifications Database proteomics data repository , 2009, Proteomics.

[53]  Michael Hucka,et al.  A Correction to the Review Titled "Rules for Modeling Signal-Transduction Systems" by W. S. Hlavacek et al. , 2006, Science's STKE.

[54]  Hidde de Jong,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Genetic Regulatory Systems: A Literature Review , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[55]  M. Mann,et al.  Effective Representation and Storage of Mass Spectrometry–Based Proteomic Data Sets for the Scientific Community , 2011, Science Signaling.

[56]  Julio Saez-Rodriguez,et al.  Cellular Regulatory Networks , 2010 .

[57]  Andrew H. Thompson,et al.  Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[58]  N. D. Clarke,et al.  Towards a Rigorous Assessment of Systems Biology Models: The DREAM3 Challenges , 2010, PloS one.

[59]  C. Jørgensen,et al.  Biological signalling activity measurements using mass spectrometry. , 2011, The Biochemical journal.

[60]  A. Heck,et al.  Quantitative Proteomics by Metabolic Labeling of Model Organisms* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[61]  M. Mann,et al.  Global, In Vivo, and Site-Specific Phosphorylation Dynamics in Signaling Networks , 2006, Cell.

[62]  Peter K. Sorger,et al.  Logic-Based Models for the Analysis of Cell Signaling Networks† , 2010, Biochemistry.

[63]  P. Ghazal,et al.  Logic models of pathway biology. , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[64]  D. di Bernardo,et al.  How to infer gene networks from expression profiles , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[65]  P. Bork,et al.  Linear Motif Atlas for Phosphorylation-Dependent Signaling , 2008, Science Signaling.

[66]  M. Mann,et al.  Dissection of the insulin signaling pathway via quantitative phosphoproteomics , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  Lukas N. Mueller,et al.  Full Dynamic Range Proteome Analysis of S. cerevisiae by Targeted Proteomics , 2009, Cell.

[68]  Vincent Danos,et al.  Internal coarse-graining of molecular systems , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  P. Bork,et al.  Systematic Discovery of In Vivo Phosphorylation Networks , 2007, Cell.

[70]  Gavin MacBeath,et al.  Dissecting protein function and signaling using protein microarrays. , 2009, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[71]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Networks Inferred from Biochemical Data Reveal Profound Differences in Toll-like Receptor and Inflammatory Signaling between Normal and Transformed Hepatocytes* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[72]  James R Faeder,et al.  Rule-based modeling of biochemical systems with BioNetGen. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[73]  R. Lai,et al.  Studies of Phosphoproteomic Changes Induced by Nucleophosmin-Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Highlight Deregulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)/Fas/TNF-related Apoptosis-induced Ligand Signaling Pathway in ALK-positive Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[74]  J. Kornhauser,et al.  PhosphoSite: A bioinformatics resource dedicated to physiological protein phosphorylation , 2004, Proteomics.

[75]  M. Mann,et al.  PHOSIDA (phosphorylation site database): management, structural and evolutionary investigation, and prediction of phosphosites , 2007, Genome Biology.

[76]  D. Vignali Multiplexed particle-based flow cytometric assays. , 2000, Journal of immunological methods.