Improving Orbit Prediction Accuracy through Supervised Machine Learning

Abstract Due to the lack of information such as the space environment condition and resident space objects’ (RSOs’) body characteristics, current orbit predictions that are solely grounded on physics-based models may fail to achieve required accuracy for collision avoidance and have led to satellite collisions already. This paper presents a methodology to predict RSOs’ trajectories with higher accuracy than that of the current methods. Inspired by the machine learning (ML) theory through which the models are learned based on large amounts of observed data and the prediction is conducted without explicitly modeling space objects and space environment, the proposed ML approach integrates physics-based orbit prediction algorithms with a learning-based process that focuses on reducing the prediction errors. Using a simulation-based space catalog environment as the test bed, the paper demonstrates three types of generalization capability for the proposed ML approach: (1) the ML model can be used to improve the same RSO’s orbit information that is not available during the learning process but shares the same time interval as the training data; (2) the ML model can be used to improve predictions of the same RSO at future epochs; and (3) the ML model based on a RSO can be applied to other RSOs that share some common features.

[1]  Yuesheng Xu,et al.  Universal Kernels , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[2]  P. Kuchynka,et al.  The Planetary and Lunar Ephemerides DE430 and DE431 , 2014 .

[3]  T. S. Cssi Kelso,et al.  Analysis of the Iridium 33 Cosmos 2251 Collision , 2009 .

[4]  T. S. Kelso,et al.  Revisiting Spacetrack Report #3 , 2006 .

[5]  Hsuan-Tien Lin,et al.  Learning From Data , 2012 .

[6]  James Bennett,et al.  Experimental results of debris orbit predictions using sparse tracking data from Mt. Stromlo , 2014 .

[7]  J. Lemoine,et al.  A new release of EIGEN-6: The latest combined global gravity field model including LAGEOS, GRACE and GOCE data from the collaboration of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse , 2012 .

[8]  Chris Sabol,et al.  Comparison of Covariance Based Track Association Approaches Using Simulated Radar Data , 2012 .

[9]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis. , 1979 .

[10]  Michael R Pearlman,et al.  THE INTERNATIONAL LASER RANGING SERVICE , 2007 .

[11]  Simo Särkkä,et al.  State-Space Inference for Non-Linear Latent Force Models with Application to Satellite Orbit Prediction , 2012, ICML.

[12]  J. Junkins,et al.  Optimal Estimation of Dynamic Systems , 2004 .

[13]  Richard H. Lyon,et al.  Geosynchronous orbit determination using space surveillance network observations and improved radiative force modeling , 2004 .

[14]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[15]  Christos Ampatzis,et al.  Machine Learning Techniques for Approximation of Objective Functions in Trajectory Optimisation , 2009 .

[16]  James W. Cutler,et al.  Robust Orbit Determination and Classification: A Learning Theoretic Approach , 2015 .

[17]  Quanxin Zhang,et al.  Propagation errors analysis of TLE data , 2009 .

[18]  P. Legendre,et al.  Two Line Element Accuracy Assessment Based On A Mixture of Gaussian Laws , 2006 .

[19]  D. Vallado Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .

[20]  J. Bennett,et al.  Estimation of ballistic coefficients of low altitude debris objects from historical two line elements , 2013 .

[21]  Barbara Hammer,et al.  A Note on the Universal Approximation Capability of Support Vector Machines , 2003, Neural Processing Letters.