Is object-based attention mandatory? Strategic control over mode of attention.

Is object-based attention mandatory or under strategic control? In an adapted spatial cuing paradigm, participants focused initially on a central arrow cue that was part of a perceptual group (Experiment 1) or a uniformly connected object (Experiment 2), encompassing one of the potential target locations. The cue always pointed to an opposite, different-object location. By varying cue validity, the strategic incentive to prevent the spread of attention to the entire cue object, and consequently to the same-object location, was manipulated: With invalid cuing and (consequently) equal probability of targets at same-object and different-object locations, a same-object target identification advantage was observed. With highly valid cuing and targets much more probable at the different-object location than at the same-object location, the same-object advantage disappeared. Object-based attention appears to be a default mode that may be ecologically adaptive but can be overridden by strategic control when there is a strong immediate benefit in doing so.

[1]  Barry D. Vaughan,et al.  Object-Based Visual Selection: Evidence From Perceptual Completion , 1998 .

[2]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[3]  A Treisman,et al.  Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Visual comparisons within and between object parts: evidence for a single-part superiority effect , 2003, Vision Research.

[5]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Object and space-based attentional selection in three-dimensional space , 2001 .

[6]  S Yantis,et al.  Attentional capture by globally defined objects , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  A. Kramer,et al.  Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  A. Lambert,et al.  Automaticity and the capture of attention by a peripheral display change , 1987 .

[9]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking , 2001, Cognition.

[10]  M Behrmann,et al.  Attending to the parts of a single object: Part-based selection limitations , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.

[13]  R. Abrams,et al.  Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays , 1972 .

[15]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[17]  P. Wühr,et al.  A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  B. Gibson.  Visual attention and objects: one versus two or convex versus concave? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision , 2001, Cognition.

[20]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  T. Shipley,et al.  PART-BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF VISUAL SHAPE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR VISUAL COGNITION , 2002 .

[23]  S. Tipper,et al.  Short Report: Object-Centred Inhibition of Return of Visual Attention , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  J. Pratt,et al.  Symbolic Control of Visual Attention , 2001, Psychological science.

[27]  G. Logan,et al.  Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention , 1996 .

[28]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information , 1984 .

[29]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: Object-Based Selection of a Region in Space , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Judith Avrahami,et al.  Objects of attention, objects of perception , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  M. Goldsmith.  What's in a location? Comparing object-based and space-based models of feature integration in visual search. , 1998 .

[33]  J. Tipples.  Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  M. Behrmann,et al.  6 Attention and unit formation: A biased competition account of object-based attention , 2001 .

[35]  Morris Goldsmith,et al.  Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focusing: The mediating role of perceptual organization: (527352012-116) , 2006 .

[36]  S. Palmer,et al.  Rethinking perceptual organization: The role of uniform connectedness , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Object-based attention: Strength of object representation and attentional guidance , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The cost of visual filtering. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Morris Goldsmith,et al.  Modulation of object-based attention by spatial focus under endogenous and exogenous orienting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  Kyle R Cave,et al.  Object-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Sarah Shomstein,et al.  Object-based attention: Sensory modulation or priority setting? , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Selective attention to the parts of an object , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  P. Kellman,et al.  From fragments to objects : segmentation and grouping in vision , 2001 .

[45]  S. Tipper.  The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[46]  Shaun P. Vecera,et al.  Toward a Biased Competition Account of Object-Based Segregation and Attention , 2000 .

[47]  Kyle R Cave,et al.  When does visual attention select all features of a distractor? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  R A Abrams,et al.  Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  D. Luna,et al.  Effects of perceptual grouping on positive and negative priming , 2006 .

[50]  S. E. Watson,et al.  Object-based visual selective attention and perceptual organization , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  Shaun P. Vecera,et al.  Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly , 1994 .

[52]  I. Rock,et al.  Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention. , 1998 .

[53]  Stephen E Palmer,et al.  Top-down influences on perceptual grouping. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[55]  B. Scholl,et al.  How does attention select and track spatially extended objects? New effects of attentional concentration and amplification. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[56]  R. Zemel,et al.  Object-Based Attention and Occlusion Evidence From Normal Participants and a Computational Model , 1998 .

[57]  Zhe Chen.  Switching attention within and between objects : The role of subjective organization , 1998 .

[58]  Hyunkyu Lee,et al.  Attentional spreading in object-based attention. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  J Jonides,et al.  Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: new perceptual objects or visual masking? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  S. Yantis,et al.  Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[62]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[63]  M. Wertheimer.  Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt. II , 1923 .

[64]  R. Kimchi.  Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[65]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[66]  Kyle R Cave,et al.  Reinstating object-based attention under positional certainty: The importance of subjective parsing , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[67]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[68]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  14. Object-based visual selection and the principle of uniform conneectedness , 1996 .