Application of response surface method on machining of Al–SiC nano-composites

Abstract The newly fabricated metal matrix nano-composite (MMNC) of Al 7075 reinforced with 1.5 wt% SiC nano-particles was prepared by a novel ultrasonic cavitation method. The high resolution scanning electron micrograph (SEM) and field emission scanning electron micrograph (FESEM) shows uniform distribution and good dispersion of the SiC nanoparticles within the aluminum metal matrix. Electrical discharge machining (EDM) was employed to machine MMNC with copper electrode by adopting face centered central composite design of response surface methodology. Analysis of variance was applied to investigate the influence of process parameters and their interactions. Further a mathematical model has been formulated in order to estimate the machining characteristics. It has been observed that pulse current was found to be the most important factor affecting all the three output parameters such as material removal rate (MRR), electrode wear rate (EWR) and surface roughness (SR). The optimum parameter of combination setting has been identified for the MMNC are voltage 50.00 V, pulse current 8.00 A, Pulse on time 8.00 μs and pulse off time 9.00 μs. Finally the parameters were optimized for maximizing MRR, minimizing EWR and SR using desirability function approach.

[1]  I. Puertas,et al.  A study on the machining parameters optimisation of electrical discharge machining , 2003 .

[2]  Stephen T. Newman,et al.  State of the art electrical discharge machining (EDM) , 2003 .

[3]  L. Froyen,et al.  Microstructure and interface characteristics of B4C, SiC and Al2O3 reinforced Al matrix composites: a comparative study , 2001 .

[4]  B. Yan,et al.  Blind-hole drilling of Al2O3/6061Al composite using rotary electro-discharge machining , 2000 .

[5]  I. Puertas,et al.  Analysis of the influence of EDM parameters on surface quality, MRR and EW of WC–Co , 2004 .

[6]  Xiaochun Li,et al.  Microstructure and microhardness of SiC nanoparticles reinforced magnesium composites fabricated by ultrasonic method , 2004 .

[7]  Hari Singh,et al.  Optimizing power consumption for CNC turned parts using response surface methodology and Taguchi's technique—A comparative analysis , 2008 .

[8]  Shaaz Abulais Current Research trends in Electric Discharge Machining(EDM):Review , 2014 .

[9]  F. Müller,et al.  Non-conventional machining of particle reinforced metal matrix composites , 2001 .

[10]  Norliana Mohd Abbas,et al.  A review on current research trends in electrical discharge machining (EDM) , 2007 .

[11]  Ko-Ta Chiang,et al.  Modeling and analysis of the effects of machining parameters on the performance characteristics in the EDM process of Al2O3+TiC mixed ceramic , 2008 .

[12]  Seung-Han Yang,et al.  Multiple-response optimization for micro-endmilling process using response surface methodology , 2011 .

[13]  Xiaochun Li,et al.  Study on bulk aluminum matrix nano-composite fabricated by ultrasonic dispersion of nano-sized SiC particles in molten aluminum alloy , 2004 .

[14]  T. A. El-Taweel,et al.  Performance analysis of wire electrochemical turning process—RSM approach , 2011 .

[15]  T. A. El-Taweel Multi-response optimization of EDM with Al–Cu–Si–TiC P/M composite electrode , 2009 .

[16]  Erol Kilickap,et al.  Modeling and optimization of burr height in drilling of Al-7075 using Taguchi method and response surface methodology , 2010 .

[18]  P. V. Rao,et al.  The effect of process parameters on machining of magnesium nano alumina composites through EDM , 2010 .

[19]  P. M. George,et al.  EDM machining of carbon–carbon composite—a Taguchi approach , 2004 .

[20]  Pradeep Kumar,et al.  Technology and research developments in powder mixed electric discharge machining (PMEDM) , 2007 .

[21]  P.Narender Singh,et al.  Electric discharge machining of Al–10%SiCP as-cast metal matrix composites , 2004 .

[22]  Y. Wong,et al.  A study on the fine-finish die-sinking micro-EDM of tungsten carbide using different electrode materials , 2009 .

[23]  F. Müller,et al.  Non-conventional machining of particle reinforced metal matrix composite , 2000 .

[24]  A. Rajadurai,et al.  Effect of SiC and rotation of electrode on electric discharge machining of Al–SiC composite , 2002 .

[25]  V. N. Gaitonde,et al.  Investigations into the effect of tool shapes with size factor consideration in sink electrical discharge machining (EDM) process , 2009 .

[26]  R. Purohit,et al.  Mathematical modeling of electric discharge machining of cast Al-4Cu-6Si alloy-10wt.% SiCp composites , 2007 .

[27]  J. Davim,et al.  Role of Powder in the Machining of Al-10%Sicp Metal Matrix Composites by Powder Mixed Electric Discharge Machining , 2011 .

[28]  J. Kruth,et al.  Investigation of material removal mechanisms in EDM of composite ceramic materials , 2004 .

[29]  Vishal S. Sharma,et al.  Review of research work in sinking EDM and WEDM on metal matrix composite materials , 2010 .

[30]  I. Murthy,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminum–fly ash nano composites made by ultrasonic method , 2012 .