Information sources for obesity prevention policy research: a review of systematic reviews

BackgroundSystematic identification of evidence in health policy can be time-consuming and challenging. This study examines three questions pertaining to systematic reviews on obesity prevention policy, in order to identify the most efficient search methods: (1) What percentage of the primary studies selected for inclusion in the reviews originated in scholarly as opposed to gray literature? (2) How much of the primary scholarly literature in this topic area is indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE? (3) Which databases index the greatest number of primary studies not indexed in PubMed, and are these databases searched consistently across systematic reviews?MethodsWe identified systematic reviews on obesity prevention policy and explored their search methods and citations. We determined the percentage of scholarly vs. gray literature cited, the most frequently cited journals, and whether each primary study was indexed in PubMed. We searched 21 databases for all primary study articles not indexed in PubMed to determine which database(s) indexed the highest number of these relevant articles.ResultsIn total, 21 systematic reviews were identified. Ten of the 21 systematic reviews reported searching gray literature, and 12 reviews ultimately included gray literature in their analyses. Scholarly articles accounted for 577 of the 649 total primary study papers. Of these, 495 (76%) were indexed in PubMed. Google Scholar retrieved the highest number of the remaining 82 non-PubMed scholarly articles, followed by Scopus and EconLit. The Journal of the American Dietetic Association was the most-cited journal.ConclusionsResearchers can maximize search efficiency by searching a small yet targeted selection of both scholarly and gray literature resources. A highly sensitive search of PubMed and those databases that index the greatest number of relevant articles not indexed in PubMed, namely multidisciplinary and economics databases, could save considerable time and effort. When combined with a gray literature search and additional search methods, including cited reference searching and consulting with experts, this approach could help maintain broad retrieval of relevant studies while improving search efficiency. Findings also have implications for designing specialized databases for public health research.

[1]  Katherine M Flegal,et al.  Trends in Obesity Prevalence Among Children and Adolescents in the United States, 1988-1994 Through 2013-2014. , 2016, JAMA.

[2]  M. Story,et al.  Influence of school competitive food and beverage policies on obesity, consumption, and availability: a systematic review. , 2014, JAMA pediatrics.

[3]  F. Chaloupka,et al.  Assessing the potential effectiveness of food and beverage taxes and subsidies for improving public health: a systematic review of prices, demand and body weight outcomes , 2013, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[4]  K. Lock,et al.  Do school based food and nutrition policies improve diet and reduce obesity? , 2009, Preventive medicine.

[5]  S. Jan,et al.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of food taxes and subsidies to improve diets: understanding the recent evidence. , 2014, Nutrition reviews.

[6]  Claire Stansfield,et al.  Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: how can we be systematic? , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[7]  N. Roberts,et al.  Studying the consumption and health outcomes of fiscal interventions (taxes and subsidies) on food and beverages in countries of different income classifications; a systematic review , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[8]  Paul Levay,et al.  The Contributions of MEDLINE, Other Bibliographic Databases and Various Search Techniques to NICE Public Health Guidance , 2015 .

[9]  K. Hofman,et al.  Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[10]  A. Bauman,et al.  Assessing the usefulness of systematic reviews for policymakers in public health: A case study of overweight and obesity prevention interventions. , 2015, Preventive medicine.

[11]  D. Freedman,et al.  Obesity - United States, 1999-2010. , 2013, MMWR supplements.

[12]  Martin Boeker,et al.  Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[13]  P. Bryden,et al.  Physical activity policies and legislation in schools: a systematic review. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  U. Bauer,et al.  [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)]. , 2000, Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie.

[15]  W. Henley,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between childhood overweight and obesity and primary school diet and physical activity policies , 2013, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[16]  Dean Giustini,et al.  The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews , 2013, Systematic Reviews.

[17]  Jean Adams,et al.  Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[18]  Rui Li,et al.  The State of Evaluation Research on Food Policies to Reduce Obesity and Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 2000–2011 , 2015, Preventing chronic disease.

[19]  Christopher M. Wharton,et al.  Changing Nutrition Standards in Schools: the Emerging Impact on School Revenue , 2022 .

[20]  D. Moher,et al.  Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Physical therapy.

[21]  C. Byker Shanks,et al.  The Impact of the 2009 Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children Food Package Revisions on Participants: A Systematic Review. , 2015, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

[22]  Kristine M Alpi,et al.  Expert searching in public health. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[23]  S. Leatherdale,et al.  Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[24]  N. Maniadakis,et al.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of taxes on nonalcoholic beverages and high-in-fat foods as a means to prevent obesity trends , 2013, ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR.

[25]  S. Hooker,et al.  Physical Activity–Related Policy and Environmental Strategies to Prevent Obesity in Rural Communities: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 2002–2013 , 2015, Preventing chronic disease.

[26]  N. Campbell,et al.  Healthy food subsidies and unhealthy food taxation: A systematic review of the evidence. , 2015, Nutrition.

[27]  Mary Shultz,et al.  Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. , 2007, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[28]  Howard R. Turtle,et al.  Development and evaluation of a prototype search engine to meet public health information needs. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[29]  Claire Stansfield,et al.  Search wide, dig deep: literature searching for qualitative research. An analysis of the publication formats and information sources used for four systematic reviews in public health , 2014, Research synthesis methods.

[30]  Dwayne Van Eerd,et al.  Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits , 2014, Research synthesis methods.

[31]  A. Auchincloss,et al.  Impact of policy and built environment changes on obesity‐related outcomes: a systematic review of naturally occurring experiments , 2015, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[32]  C. Beahler,et al.  Information retrieval in systematic reviews: challenges in the public health arena. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[33]  Carmen J Byker,et al.  Recent population adherence to and knowledge of United States federal nutrition guides, 1992-2013: a systematic review. , 2014, Nutrition reviews.

[34]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[35]  S. Leeder,et al.  The effectiveness of policies for reducing dietary trans fat: a systematic review of the evidence. , 2013, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[36]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching , 2015, PloS one.

[37]  Laura A. Levit,et al.  Finding what works in health care : standards for systematic reviews , 2011 .

[38]  Dean Giustini,et al.  Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews , 2013, Online journal of public health informatics.

[39]  Sameer M. Siddiqi,et al.  Obesity-Related Policy/Environmental Interventions: A Systematic Review of Economic Analyses. , 2016, American journal of preventive medicine.

[40]  Jung-Han Kim,et al.  Stereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy of Non-Mass Calcifications: Outcome and Accuracy at Long-Term Follow-Up , 2003, Korean journal of radiology.

[41]  F. Racioppi,et al.  Economic analyses of transport infrastructure and policies including health effects related to cycling and walking: A systematic review , 2008 .