PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF TELEVISION INFLUENCE AND OPINIONS ABOUT CENSORSHIP IN SINGAPORE

[1]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  FOR THE GOOD OF OTHERS: CENSORSHIP AND THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT , 1996 .

[2]  Diana C. Mutz THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEPTIONS OF MEDIA INFLUENCE: THIRD PERSON EFFECTS AND THE PUBLIC EXPRESSION OF OPINIONS* , 1989 .

[3]  W. Hachten,et al.  The growth of media in the Third World , 1993 .

[4]  W. Davison The Third-Person Effect in Communication , 1983 .

[5]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Cultural variation in unrealistic optimism: Does the West feel more vulnerable than the East? , 1995 .

[6]  D. Emmerson Singapore and the "Asian Values" Debate , 1995 .

[7]  R. Cialdini Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[8]  N. Weinstein Optimistic biases about personal risks. , 1989, Science.

[9]  Dominic L. Lasorsa,et al.  Real and Perceived Effects of ‘Amerika’ , 1989 .

[10]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[11]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Overrating the X‐Rating: The Third‐Person Perception and Support for Censorship of Pornography , 1995 .

[12]  David H Tewksbury,et al.  MEASURING THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT OF NEWS: THE IMPACT OF QUESTION ORDER, CONTRAST AND KNOWLEDGE , 1996 .

[13]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  PERCEIVED IMPACT OF DEFAMATION AN EXPERIMENT ON THIRD-PERSON EFFECTS , 1988 .

[14]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Biased Optimism and the Third-Person Effect , 1993 .

[15]  H. Triandis The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[16]  Richard M. Perloff,et al.  THIRD-PERSON EFFECT RESEARCH 1983–1992: A REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS , 1993 .

[17]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  What We Think Others Think , 1991 .

[18]  Charles T. Salmon,et al.  THE ‘OTHER’ AS THE VULNERABLE VOTER: A STUDY OF THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT IN THE 1988 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN , 1990 .