Self-organizing Service Structures for Cyber-physical Control Models with Applications in Dynamic Factory Automation - A Fog/Edge-based Solution Pattern Towards Service-Oriented Process Automation

The convergence of information technology and operational technology is a strong force in fabric automation. Service-oriented architectures and cloud computing technologies expand into next generation production systems. Those technologies enable a lot of new possibilities; such as high agility, global connectivity and high computing capacities. However, they also bring huge challenges regarding flexibility and reliability through increasing system dynamics, complexity and heterogenity. New solution patterns are needed to conquer those challenges. This paper proposes a new fog-oriented approach, which shows how future production systems, that are often called cyber-physical production systems, can deal with dynamically changing services and infrastructure elements. The goal is to provide an adequate degree of flexibility and reliability across the whole production lifecycle. Therefore, an event property model (“bubble model”), a multi-criterial evaluation metric and extensions to Kuhn-Munkres and Add algorithm are described. The overall concept is evaluated by an application example from the field of process engineering. With the help of practical case studies and dynamic system simulations, qualitative results are gained.

[1]  Takao Nishizeki,et al.  Handbook of graph theory, combinatorial optimization, and algorithms , 2016 .

[2]  Thomas Greiner,et al.  Handling strategy of dynamic resource events in cyber-physical production systems by a multi-criterial and multi-operational approach , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).

[3]  Anita Goel,et al.  Cloud service orchestration based architecture of OpenStack Nova and Swift , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI).

[4]  Kin K. Leung,et al.  Dynamic service migration in mobile edge-clouds , 2015, 2015 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking).

[5]  Wan-dong Cai,et al.  Criticality-driven QoS adaptive dynamic resource management for distributed and embedded safety & mission critical systems , 2010, 4th International Conference on New Trends in Information Science and Service Science.

[6]  Susanne Teschl,et al.  Mathematik für Informatiker , 2013 .

[7]  Rajeev Alur,et al.  Principles of Cyber-Physical Systems , 2015 .

[8]  Frank Eliassen,et al.  Models@run.time for Creating In-Cloud Dynamic Cyber-Physical Ecosystems , 2014, 2014 IEEE 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science.

[9]  Sergio Barbarossa,et al.  The Fog Balancing: Load Distribution for Small Cell Cloud Computing , 2015, 2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[10]  Elisabetta Di Nitto,et al.  Mycocloud: Elasticity through Self-Organized Service Placement in Decentralized Clouds , 2015, 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Cloud Computing.

[11]  P. Venkata Krishna,et al.  Challenges, Opportunities, and Dimensions of Cyber-Physical Systems , 2014 .

[12]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Cloud Computing Principles and Paradigms , 2011 .

[13]  Manfred Broy Cyber-Physical Systems , 2010 .

[14]  Robert D. van der Mei,et al.  Real-Time QoS Control for Service Orchestration , 2015, 2015 27th International Teletraffic Congress.

[15]  Massimiliano Ruggeri,et al.  In-Tractor Cloud: A Vision of Service-Oriented System Design Enabled by High-Speed In-Vehicle Networks for a Safer Task and Machine Management , 2016 .

[16]  Thomas Greiner,et al.  Application-independent approach for the dynamic management of IT-resources in cyber-physical systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT).

[17]  Edward A. Lee,et al.  Toward a Global Data Infrastructure , 2016, IEEE Internet Computing.