Exploring factors of preparing public engagement for large-scale development projects via a focus group study

Abstract Public engagement (PE) is increasingly employed to gauge public opinions and obtain their support on large-scale planning and development projects. Despite its booming development, there is a lack of research on how to prepare PE activities. In order to explore the factors of preparing PE activities in the construction industry, four focus groups were conducted, each including different stakeholders (e.g., PE organizers, construction professionals, interest groups, and local residents). Seven critical factors for preparing PE were identified into 3 main dimensions: (1) social (e.g., governmental support and bottom-up consultation approaches); (2) project (e.g., project characteristics, PE program, and project information and publicity); and (3) stakeholder (e.g., stakeholder identification and representative sampling). Based on the results of focus groups, we propose several practical recommendations to stimulate active engagement and improve performance of PE activities, including developing PE guidelines, preparing project information with appropriate language and formatting, and establishing stakeholder identification methods.

[1]  Tracey L. Hurd,et al.  VIII. The Seduction of Sameness: Similarity and Representing the Other , 1996 .

[2]  Janet Smithson,et al.  Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities , 2000 .

[3]  N. Roberts Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation , 2004 .

[4]  J. Sim,et al.  Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[6]  Renée A. Irvin,et al.  Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the effort? , 2004 .

[7]  Stefan Olander,et al.  Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects , 2005 .

[8]  Gerry Stoker,et al.  Trends in Public Participation: Part 2 – Citizens' Perspectives , 2001 .

[9]  J. Kujala,et al.  A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects , 2010 .

[10]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  Democracy in the Risk Society - Learning from the Politics of Mobility in Munich , 1999 .

[11]  Gert Tinggaard Svendsen,et al.  Is local participation always optimal for sustainable action? The costs of consensus-building in Local Agenda 21. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Conflict or consensus: An investigation of stakeholder concerns during the participation process of major infrastructure and construction projects in Hong Kong , 2012 .

[13]  R. Pomeroy,et al.  The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process , 2008 .

[14]  Greg Myers,et al.  Displaying opinions: Topics and disagreement in focus groups , 1998, Language in Society.

[15]  C. Webb,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN NURSING RESEARCH 2 Focus groups as a research method : a critique of some aspects of their use in nursing research , 2001 .

[16]  K. Stave Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions , 2002 .

[17]  C. O’faircheallaigh Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making , 2010 .

[18]  P. Kidd,et al.  Getting the Focus and the Group: Enhancing Analytical Rigor in Focus Group Research , 2000, Qualitative health research.

[19]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  Patrick McAlpine,et al.  Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  D. Morgan,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis: A Guide to Paths not Taken , 1993, Qualitative health research.

[22]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger , 1989 .

[23]  Civic engagement in the policy process in Hong Kong: Change and continuity , 2011 .

[24]  S Ogunlana,et al.  An Assessment of People's Satisfaction with the Public Hearing on the Yadana Natural Gas Pipeline Project , 2001, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[25]  Colin C. Williams,et al.  Developing Community Involvement: Contrasting Local and Regional Participatory Cultures in Britain and their Implications for Policy , 2003 .

[26]  Rory V. O'Connor Using grounded theory coding mechanisms to analyze case study and focus group data in the context of software process research , 2012 .

[27]  M. Reed Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[28]  Gerry Stoker,et al.  Trends In Public Participation: Part 1 – Local Government Perspectives , 2001 .

[29]  Barbara Du Bois,et al.  Passionate Scholarship--Notes on Values, Knowing and Method in Feminist Social Science. , 1979 .

[30]  N. El-Gohary,et al.  Stakeholder management for public private partnerships , 2006 .

[31]  Sarah J. Tracy,et al.  Nightmares, Demons, and Slaves , 2006 .

[32]  Fran C. Blumberg,et al.  A grounded theory study of help-seeking behaviors among White male high school students. , 2003 .

[33]  M. Leung,et al.  Focus group study to explore critical factors of public engagement process for mega development projects , 2014 .

[34]  Lawrence C. Walters,et al.  Putting More Public in Policy Analysis , 2000 .

[35]  M. Leung,et al.  Exploring Stressors of Hong Kong Expatriate Construction Professionals in Mainland China: Focus Group Study , 2012 .

[36]  Gilles Desthieux,et al.  Participatory diagnosis in urban planning: proposal for a learning process based on geographical information. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[37]  Gerald R. Adams,et al.  Understanding research methods , 1985 .

[38]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  Stefan Olander,et al.  Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management , 2007 .

[40]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  The Focused Interview , 1946, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[42]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The need for integration: risk policies require the input from experts, stakeholders and the public at large , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[43]  W. Poortinga,et al.  Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitations , 2008 .

[44]  Eddie John Fisher,et al.  What practitioners consider to be the skills and behaviours of an effective people project manager , 2011 .

[45]  J. Petts Learning about learning: lessons from public engagement and deliberation on urban river restoration , 2007 .

[46]  Kirsi Aaltonen,et al.  Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process , 2011 .

[47]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[48]  Paul. Olomolaiye,et al.  Risk and construction stakeholders , 2010 .

[49]  N Witters,et al.  Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for "gentle" remediation approaches: the European context. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[50]  Catherine C. H. Chiu CYNICISM ABOUT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN HONG KONG , 2005 .