Real-time robotic transrectal ultrasound navigation during robotic radical prostatectomy: initial clinical experience.

OBJECTIVE To describe a novel robotic transrectal ultrasound platform for real-time navigation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) and to report its early clinical application. METHODS Five men undergoing RALPs at our Institution agreed to participate in this Institutional Review Board-approved pilot study. All of them were eligible for a bilateral nerve sparing procedure. Before docking the da Vinci robot, a transrectal ultrasound tri-plane side-fire probe was placed. A modified ViKY Endoscope Holder was used during RALPs to move the probe thanks to a remote control placed under the console surgeon's control during RALPs. During each procedure, attempt was made to estimate prostate volume, define 12 reference points, and to precisely identify location of the neurovascular bundles using Doppler ultrasound. The TilePro was used during the procedures to allow real-time ultrasound imaging to guide robotic instruments during dissection. RESULTS Median robotic transrectal ultrasound probe holder (R-TRUS) setup time was 11 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 10-14). Prostate volume calculation, reference point definition, neurovascular bundle identification, and instrument tip visualization were successful in all men. In 1 patient with a large prostate (120 mL), R-TRUS was withdrawn during recto-prostatic dissection. There were no rectal injuries. CONCLUSION R-TRUS during RALPs is feasible and safe. It allows real-time TRUS navigation and guidance. Further studies are needed to evaluate its impact on oncological and functional outcomes.

[1]  Osamu Ukimura,et al.  Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: impact on surgical margins. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[2]  Philippe Cinquin,et al.  Development of miniaturized light endoscope-holder robot for laparoscopic surgery , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[3]  Osamu Ukimura,et al.  Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: pictorial essay. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[4]  M. Wirth,et al.  Radical prostatectomy-only centers: the future in genitourinary surgery? , 2010, European urology.

[5]  Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry,et al.  Prostate biopsies guided by three-dimensional real-time (4-D) transrectal ultrasonography on a phantom: comparative study versus two-dimensional transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies , 2007, European urology.

[6]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  Peroperative transrectal ultrasonography‐guided bladder neck dissection eases the learning of robot‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy , 2008, BJU international.

[7]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical techniques and outcomes. , 2007, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[8]  I. Gill,et al.  Imaging-assisted endoscopic surgery: Cleveland Clinic experience. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[9]  Arieh L. Shalhav,et al.  Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. , 2009, Urology.

[10]  D. Stoianovici,et al.  Tandem-robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to improve the neurovascular bundle visualization: a feasibility study. , 2011, Urology.

[11]  Philippe Cinquin,et al.  Automatic Localization of Laparoscopic Instruments for the Visual Servoing of an Endoscopic Camera Holder , 2006, MICCAI.

[12]  M. Marberger Is robot-assisted radical prostatectomy safer than other radical prostatectomy techniques? , 2011, European urology.

[13]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences. , 2009, European urology.

[14]  Philippe Cinquin,et al.  Development and testing of a compact endoscope manipulator for minimally invasive surgery. , 2005 .

[15]  Osamu Ukimura,et al.  Real-time transrectal ultrasonography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2004, The Journal of urology.