Effects of airway evaluation parameters on the laryngeal view grade in mandibular prognathism and retrognathism patients

Background Failure to maintain a patent airway can result in brain damage or death. In patients with mandibular prognathism or retrognathism, intubation is generally thought to be difficult. We determined the degree of difficulty of airway management in patients with mandibular deformity using anatomic criteria to define and grade difficulty of endotracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy. Methods Measurements were performed on 133 patients with prognathism and 33 with retrognathism scheduled for corrective esthetic surgery. A case study was performed on 89 patients with a normal mandible as the control group. In all patients, mouth opening distance (MOD), mandibular depth (MD), mandibular length (ML), mouth opening angle (MOA), neck extension angle (EXT), neck flexion angle (FLX), thyromental distance (TMD), inter-notch distance (IND), thyromental area (TMA), Mallampati grade, and Cormack and Lehane grade were measured. Results Cormack and Lehane grade I was observed in 84.2%, grade II in 15.0%, and grade III in 0.8% of mandibular prognathism cases; among retrognathism cases, 45.4% were grade I, 27.3% grade II, and 27.3% grade III; among controls, 65.2% were grade I, 26.9% were grade II, and 7.9% were grade III. MOD, MOA, ML, TMD, and TMA were greater in the prognathism group than in the control and retrognathism groups (P < 0.05). The measurements of ML were shorter in retrognathism than in the control and prognathism groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions Laryngoscopic intubation was easier in patients with prognathism than in those with normal mandibles. However, in retrognathism, the laryngeal view grade was poor and the ML was an important factor.

[1]  H. Prabhakar,et al.  Airway management in a patient with occipital encephalocele with retrognathia and complete bilateral cleft palate , 2008, Journal of Anesthesia.

[2]  M. Karmakar,et al.  A Systematic Review (Meta-Analysis) of the Accuracy of the Mallampati Tests to Predict the Difficult Airway , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  Hyun Jeong Kim,et al.  Airway Evaluation for Endotracheal Intubation of Mandibular Prognathic Patient , 2003 .

[4]  R. Krohner Anesthetic Considerations and Techniques for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , 2003, International anesthesiology clinics.

[5]  A. Ho,et al.  On predicting difficult intubation , 2002, Anaesthesia.

[6]  R. Fahlbusch,et al.  Difficult Intubation in Acromegalic Patients: Incidence and Predictability , 2000, Anesthesiology.

[7]  Y Ariji,et al.  Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of morphologic airway changes after mandibular setback osteotomy for prognathism. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[8]  M. Pogrel,et al.  Assessment of the pharyngeal airway space after mandibular setback surgery. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[9]  J. Hollander,et al.  Assessment of laryngeal view: Percentage of glottic opening scorevs Cormack and Lehane grading , 1999, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[10]  V. Dimitriou,et al.  Value of oropharyngeal Mallampati classification in predicting difficult laryngoscopy among obese patients. , 1998, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[11]  P. Collicott,et al.  Bilateral mandibular subcondylar fractures contributing to airway obstruction. , 1995, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[12]  A E Delilkan,et al.  Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  A. Enacar,et al.  Changes in hypopharyngeal airway space and in tongue and hyoid bone positions following the surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. , 1994, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[14]  M. Umino,et al.  Morphologic airway changes after mandibular setback osteotomy for prognathism with and without cleft palate. , 1993, Anesthesia & pain control in dentistry.

[15]  W. Mapleson,et al.  Effects of posture, phonation and observer on Mallampati classification. , 1992, British journal of anaesthesia.

[16]  Jonathan L. Benumof,et al.  Management of the Difficult Adult Airway With Special Emphasis on Awake Tracheal Intubation , 1991, Anesthesiology.

[17]  C. Frerk Predicting difficult intubation , 1991, Anaesthesia.

[18]  P. D. Oates,et al.  Comparison of two methods for predicting difficult intubation. , 1991, British journal of anaesthesia.

[19]  K L Posner,et al.  Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. , 1990, Anesthesiology.

[20]  J. R. Young,et al.  Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study , 1987, Anaesthesia.

[21]  L. Tiret,et al.  Complications Associated with Anaesthesia—A Prospective Survey in France , 1986 .

[22]  L. Gugino,et al.  A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. , 1986, Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal.

[23]  Stephen P. Gatt,et al.  A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation; a prospective study , 1985 .

[24]  R S Cormack,et al.  Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics , 1983, Anaesthesia.