Risk evaluation of rock burst through theory of static and dynamic stresses superposition

Rock burst is one of the most catastrophic dynamic hazards in coal mining. A static and dynamic stresses superposition-based (SDSS-based) risk evaluation method of rock burst was proposed to pre-evaluate rock burst risk. Theoretical basis of this method is the stress criterion incurring rock burst and rock burst risk is evaluated according to the closeness degree of the total stress (due to the superposition of static stress in the coal and dynamic stress induced by tremors) with the critical stress. In addition, risk evaluation criterion of rock burst was established by defining the “Satisfaction Degree” of static stress. Furthermore, the method was used to pre-evaluate rock burst risk degree and prejudge endangered area of an insular longwall face in Nanshan Coal Mine in China. Results show that rock burst risk is moderate at advance extent of 97 m, strong at advance extent of 97–131 m, and extremely strong (i.e. inevitable to occur) when advance extent exceeds 131 m (mining is prohibited in this case). The section of two gateways whose floor abuts 15-3 coal seam is a susceptible area prone to rock burst. Evaluation results were further compared with rock bursts and tremors detected by microseismic monitoring. Comparison results indicate that evaluation results are consistent with microseismic monitoring, which proves the method’s feasibility.

[1]  Han Rongjun,et al.  FAULT-PILLAR INDUCED ROCK BURST MECHANISM OF THICK COAL SEAM IN DEEP MINING , 2013 .

[2]  Jiang He,et al.  Rock burst induced by roof breakage and its prevention , 2012 .

[3]  Cai-ping Lu,et al.  Classification of microseismic events in high stress zone , 2009 .

[4]  Hu He,et al.  Rockburst hazard determination by using computed tomography technology in deep workface , 2012 .

[5]  J. Heng,et al.  Study on Characteristic of Overburden Movement in Unsymmetrical Isolated Longwall Mining Using Microseismic Technique , 2011 .

[6]  W. Enyuan,et al.  The dynamic impact of rock burst induced by the fracture of the thick and hard key stratum , 2011 .

[7]  J. Kornowski,et al.  Prediction of rockburst probability given seismic energy and factors defined by the expert method of hazard evaluation (MRG) , 2012, Acta Geophysica.

[8]  Xia-Ting Feng,et al.  Rockburst characteristics and numerical simulation based on a new energy index: a case study of a tunnel at 2,500 m depth , 2010 .

[9]  Zong-long Mu,et al.  F-structure model of overlying strata for dynamic disaster prevention in coal mine , 2013 .

[10]  Petr Konicek,et al.  Long-hole destress blasting for rockburst control during deep underground coal mining , 2013 .

[11]  Hu He,et al.  Deep-hole directional fracturing of thick hard roof for rockburst prevention , 2012 .

[12]  Li Wu,et al.  Knowledge-based and data-driven fuzzy modeling for rockburst prediction , 2013 .

[13]  Renata Patyńśka The consequences of the rock burst hazard in the Silesian companies in Poland , 2013 .

[14]  LU Cai-ping,et al.  Characteristic and prevention research on rock burst of thin coal seam , 2012 .

[15]  Józef Kabiesz,et al.  Scale of seismic and rock burst hazard in the Silesian companies in Poland , 2009 .

[16]  María B. Díaz Aguado,et al.  Influence of the stress state in a coal bump-prone deep coalbed: A case study , 2009 .

[17]  Wancheng Zhu,et al.  Dynamic-static coupling analysis on rockburst mechanism in jointed rock mass , 2012 .

[18]  W. Hongwei,et al.  Numerical investigation on the assessment and mitigation of coal bump in an island longwall panel , 2013 .

[19]  Kamran Goshtasbi,et al.  3-D modeling of rock burst in pillar No. 19 of Fetr6 chromite mine , 2013 .

[20]  J. Kornowski,et al.  The basic assumptions of the quantitative version of the Comprehensive Method of Rockburst Hazard Evaluation , 2013 .