Launch decisions and new product success: an empirical comparison of consumer and industrial products

Many articles have investigated new product development success and failure. However, most of them have used the vantage point of characteristics of the product and development process in this research. In this article we extend this extensive stream of research, looking at factors affecting success; however, we look at the product in the context of the launch support program. We empirically answer the question of whether successful launch decisions differ for consumer and industrial products and identify how they differ. From data collected on over 1,000 product introductions, we first contrast consumer product launches with industrial product launches to identify key differences and similarities in launch decisions between market types. For consumer products, strategic launch decisions appear more defensive in nature, as they focus on defending current market positions. Industrial product strategic launch decisions seem more offensive, using technology and innovation to push the firm to operate outside their current realm of operations and move into new markets. The tactical marketing mix launch decisions (product, place, promotion and price) also differ markedly across the products launched for the two market types. Successful products were contrasted with failed products to identify those launch decisions that discriminate between both outcomes. Here the differences are more of degree rather than principle. Some launch decisions were associated with success for consumer and industrial products alike. Launch successes are more likely to be broader assortments of more innovative product improvements that are advertised with print advertising, independent of market. Other launch decisions uniquely related to success per product type, especially at the marketing mix level (pricing, distribution, and promotion in particular). The launch decisions most frequently made by firms are not well aligned with factors associated with higher success. Additionally, comparing the decisions associated with success to the recommendations for launches from the normative literature suggests that a number of conventional heuristics about how to launch products of each type will actually lead to failure rather than success.

[1]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Strategies Behind The Successful Industrial Product Launch , 1984 .

[2]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  New Products Management , 1983 .

[3]  D. Shipley,et al.  Brand-naming industrial products , 1993 .

[4]  D. Adams.  Parallel market analysis: A technique for risk-averse brand innovation , 1995 .

[5]  Diana L. Day,et al.  Corporate ventures into industrial markets: Dynamics of aggressive entry☆ , 1987 .

[6]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[7]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[8]  Michael R. Mullen.  Diagnosing Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research , 1995 .

[9]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  How new product strategies impact on performance , 1984 .

[10]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Corporate diversification: Entry, strategy, and performance , 1984 .

[11]  Andy Mosmans.  Brand strategy: Creating concepts that drive the business , 1995 .

[12]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure , 1979 .

[13]  Rita Mårtenson.  The role of brands in European marketing , 1995 .

[14]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[15]  C. Fornell,et al.  Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages in Consumer Goods Industries , 1985 .

[16]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Measurement Issues in Cross-National Research , 1995 .

[17]  S. Hart,et al.  The world’s path to the better mousetrap: myth or reality? An empirical investigation into the launch strategies of high and low advantage new products , 1998 .

[18]  H. Cooper,et al.  A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires , 1983 .

[19]  Dung Nguyen.  Competitive marketing strategies. , 1997, National medical-legal journal.

[20]  Jeffrey B. Schmidt.  New product myopia , 1995 .

[21]  Adrian B. Ryans.  Strategic Market Entry Factors and Market Share Achievement in Japan , 1988 .

[22]  B. Zirger,et al.  A study of success and failure in product innovation: The case of the U.S. electronics industry , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[23]  Robert D. Gulbro,et al.  Differences in cross‐cultural negotiation behavior between industrial product and consumer product firms , 1995 .

[24]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  Industrial New Product Launch Strategies and Product Development Performance , 1997 .

[25]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  New product performance: Keys to success, profitability & cycle time reduction , 1995 .

[26]  David S. Hopkins,et al.  New-product winners and losers , 1980 .

[27]  C. Easingwood,et al.  New product launch: Marketing action and launch tactics for high-technology products , 1996 .

[28]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  New industrial product performance: The effects of market characteristics and strategy☆ , 1985 .

[29]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .

[30]  R. Abratt,et al.  Determinants of product innovation in speciality chemical companies , 1993 .

[31]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  SAPPHO updated - project SAPPHO phase II , 1993 .

[32]  Adrian B. Ryans,et al.  Entry strategies and market performance causal modeling of a business simulation , 1990 .

[33]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  A decision-support system for evaluating sales prospects and launch strategies for new products , 1986 .

[34]  A. Griffin,et al.  An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure , 1993 .

[35]  M. Lambkin.  Order of entry and performance in new markets , 1988 .

[36]  S. Dibb,et al.  Implementation problems in industrial market-segmentation , 1994 .