Closing the Missing Links and Opening the Relationships among the Factors: A Literature Review on the Use of Clicker Technology Using the 3P Model

Clicker technology is one of the most widely adopted communication systems in college classroom environments. Previous literature reviews on clicker technology have identified and thoroughly documented the advantages, disadvantages, and implications of the use of this technology; the current review is intended to synthesize those earlier findings and recast them in terms of the interrelationship between the “3 Ps” of the 3P model: Presage, Process, and Product factors. Using this guided framework enables the identification of the most up-to-date trends and issues in clicker studies published in peer-reviewed journals since 2009. The review shows that recent clicker studies have examined the effects of clickers in terms of student presage factors (cognitive, non-cognitive, background factors), instructor presage factors (instructor effects and the level of the course taught), process factors (delivery method, instructional activities, and assessment and feedback), and product factors (cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes). A heat-mapping approach is used to facilitate the interpretation of the results. The findings also discuss missing/unaddressed links and the untapped relationships among instructional factors in these studies. This study concludes that teaching and learning with the use of clicker technology is a complex and relational phenomenon; factors that are currently under-explored should be examined using more rigorous research methods to close gaps in the literature and to enhance understanding of the use of clickers in classroom learning environments.

[1]  Joelle D. Elicker,et al.  Interactive Learning in the Classroom , 2011 .

[2]  Daniel B. King.  Using Clickers To Identify the Muddiest Points in Large Chemistry Classes , 2011 .

[3]  Kevin Johnson,et al.  Clickers in the Laboratory: Student Thoughts and Views , 2010 .

[4]  Geoff Rubner.  Mobile Phone-Based Classroom Response System , 2011 .

[5]  Alanna Christine Ross,et al.  Active Learning in the Library Instruction Environment: An Exploratory Study , 2011 .

[6]  C. Wieman,et al.  Transforming Physics Education , 2005 .

[7]  J. Trew,et al.  Getting the most out of audience response systems: predicting student reactions , 2012 .

[8]  Bjarne Schmidt,et al.  Teaching engineering dynamics by use of peer instruction supported by an audience response system , 2011 .

[9]  Christine McDonald,et al.  Mobile-phone-based classroom response systems: Students’ perceptions of engagement and learning in a large undergraduate course , 2013 .

[10]  Emily K Chan,et al.  “Clicking” with your audience: Evaluating the use of personal response systems in library instruction , 2010 .

[11]  Katelyn M. Southard,et al.  Understanding Clicker Discussions: Student Reasoning and the Impact of Instructional Cues , 2013, CBE life sciences education.

[12]  E. Guba,et al.  Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. , 2005 .

[13]  Leland Wilkinson,et al.  The History of the Cluster Heat Map , 2009 .

[14]  D. Bright,et al.  Audience response systems during case-based discussions: A pilot study of student perceptions , 2013 .

[15]  K. Krauter,et al.  Combining Peer Discussion with Instructor Explanation Increases Student Learning from In-Class Concept Questions , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[16]  Robin H. Kay,et al.  Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[17]  Kjetil L. Nielsen,et al.  Teaching with student response systems (SRS): teacher-centric aspects that can negatively affect students' experience of using SRS , 2013 .

[18]  D. Gachago,et al.  Engagement levels in a graphic design clicker class: Students’ perceptions around attention, participation and peer learning , 2011 .

[19]  Marianne Fallon,et al.  High-Tech Versus Low-Tech Instructional Strategies , 2011 .

[20]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  Research on College Teaching: The Historical Background. , 1990 .

[21]  Clyde Freeman Herreid,et al.  Gender differences in student performance in large lecture classrooms using personal response systems (‘clickers’) with narrative case studies , 2012 .

[22]  Scott Freeman,et al.  Increased Course Structure Improves Performance in Introductory Biology , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[23]  European Journal of Engineering Education , 2013 .

[24]  G. Boulton‐Lewis.  Teaching for quality learning at university , 2008 .

[25]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures? , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Assessing Clicker Examples Versus Board Examples in Calculus , 2012 .

[27]  Chu-Chen Rosa Yeh,et al.  How Benefits and Challenges of Personal Response System Impact Students' Continuance Intention? A Taiwanese Context , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[28]  Adam Finkelstein,et al.  Understanding the effects of professors' pedagogical development with Clicker Assessment and Feedback technologies and the impact on students' engagement and learning in higher education , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Penny M. Beile,et al.  Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation , 2005 .

[30]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[31]  Kristen L. Murphy,et al.  Using a Personal Response System to Map Cognitive Efficiency and Gain Insight into a Proposed Learning Progression in Preparatory Chemistry. , 2012 .

[32]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  A Controlled Study of Clicker-Assisted Memory Enhancement in College Classrooms , 2012 .

[33]  Andrew Quinn.  An Exploratory Study of Opinions on Clickers and Class Participation From Students of Human Behavior in the Social Environment , 2010 .

[34]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  Self-Assembled Student Interactions in Undergraduate General Chemistry Clicker Classrooms. , 2013 .

[35]  B. Patterson,et al.  Evidence for teaching practice: the impact of clickers in a large classroom environment. , 2010, Nurse education today.

[36]  Bill Rogers,et al.  Context matters: increasing understanding with interactive Clicker Case studies , 2011 .

[37]  Kumar Laxman,et al.  A study on the adoption of clickers in higher education , 2011 .

[38]  L. Holland,et al.  Adapting Clicker Technology to Diversity Courses: New Research Insights , 2013 .

[39]  R. Eric Landrum.  The Ubiquitous Clicker , 2013 .

[40]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Analysis of Peer Interaction in Learning Activities with Personal Handhelds and Shared Displays , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[41]  T. Holme,et al.  Classroom response systems have not 'crossed the chasm': estimating numbers of chemistry faculty who use clickers , 2012 .

[42]  กฤษณะ ทองแก้ว.  The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2013 .

[43]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[44]  Helena Seli,et al.  Metacognition and the influence of polling systems: how do clickers compare with low technology systems , 2013, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[45]  E. Maring,et al.  Using Clicker Technology with Rural, Low-Income Mothers: Collecting Sensitive Data Anonymously , 2013 .

[46]  B. Rush,et al.  Investigation into the impact of audience response devices on short- and long-term content retention. , 2013, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[47]  David N. Steer,et al.  Assessing Multimedia Influences on Student Responses Using a Personal Response System , 2012 .

[48]  Peter White,et al.  Clicking for grades? Really? Investigating the use of clickers for awarding grade-points in post-secondary education , 2011, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[49]  Holly Zullo,et al.  Addressing Common Student Errors With Classroom Voting in Multivariable Calculus , 2012 .

[50]  Jennifer Kadlowec,et al.  Classes That Click: Fast, Rich Feedback to Enhance Student Learning and Satisfaction , 2010 .

[51]  Diane M. Bunce,et al.  How Long Can Students Pay Attention in Class? A Study of Student Attention Decline Using Clickers , 2010 .

[52]  Debra Filer,et al.  Everyone's Answering: Using Technology to Increase Classroom Participation , 2010, Nursing education perspectives.

[53]  Shannon D. Willoughby,et al.  Listening to student conversations during clicker questions: What you have not heard might surprise you! , 2011 .

[54]  K. Anthis,et al.  Is It the Clicker, or Is It the Question? Untangling the Effects of Student Response System Use , 2011 .

[55]  Susan R. Welch.  Effectiveness of clickers as a pedagogical tool in improving nursing student's examination performance , 2012 .

[56]  Byron J. Pike,et al.  A quasi-experimental assessment of interactive student response systems on student confidence, effort, and course performance , 2013 .

[57]  Marcela Velasco,et al.  Teaching Large Classes with Clickers: Results from a Teaching Experiment in Comparative Politics , 2013, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[58]  Alice Richardson,et al.  Instructor perceptions of using a mobile-phone-based free classroom response system in first-year statistics undergraduate courses , 2012 .

[59]  Helena Seli,et al.  "Clickers" and metacognition: A quasi-experimental comparative study about metacognitive self-regulation and use of electronic feedback devices , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[60]  Pavlo D. Antonenko,et al.  The impact of collaborative and individualized student response system strategies on learner motivation, metacognition, and knowledge transfer , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[62]  Dawn M. Poole.  The Impact of Anonymous and Assigned Use of Student Response Systems on Student Achievement , 2012 .

[63]  R. Beard,et al.  Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , 1972 .

[64]  Danielle H. Dallaire,et al.  Effective Use of Personal Response “Clicker” Systems in Psychology Courses , 2011 .

[65]  Tzy-Ling Chen,et al.  Using a personal response system as an in-class assessment tool in the teaching of basic college chemistry , 2013 .

[66]  R. Kane,et al.  Telling Half the Story: A Critical Review of Research on the Teaching Beliefs and Practices of University Academics , 2002 .

[67]  Jae Hoon Han,et al.  Unpacking and repacking the factors affecting students' perceptions of the use of classroom communication systems (CCS) technology , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[68]  Celia Popovic,et al.  Teaching for quality learning at university. (2nd Edn.) , 2013 .

[69]  Leonard R. Bachman,et al.  A study of classroom response system clickers: Increasing student engagement and performance in a large undergraduate lecture class on architectural research , 2011 .

[70]  D. Auber,et al.  GosperMap: Using a Gosper Curve for Laying Out Hierarchical Data , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[71]  Lorena Blasco-Arcas,et al.  Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[72]  Dan Cernusca,et al.  Ac 2012-4852 : Millennials Perception of Using Clicker to Support an Active Classroom Environment : an Early Adoption Perspective , 2012 .

[73]  Heather K. Evans.  Making Politics “Click”: The Costs and Benefits of Using Clickers in an Introductory Political Science Course , 2012 .

[74]  Analyzing Student Confidence in Classroom Voting With Multiple Choice Questions , 2013 .

[75]  Kathryn E. Perez,et al.  Does Displaying the Class Results Affect Student Discussion during Peer Instruction? , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[76]  B. Rush,et al.  The effect of differing Audience Response System question types on student attention in the veterinary medical classroom. , 2010, Journal of veterinary medical education.

[77]  Cheryl Fortner-Wood,et al.  The Effects of Student Response Systems on Student Learning and Attitudes in Undergraduate Psychology Courses , 2013 .

[78]  Jacob Cohen.  The earth is round (p < .05) , 1994 .

[79]  Cynthia Bailey Lee,et al.  Can peer instruction be effective in upper-division computer science courses? , 2013, TOCE.

[80]  Katherine J. Denker.  Student Response Systems and Facilitating the Large Lecture Basic Communication Course: Assessing Engagement and Learning , 2013 .

[81]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Learning to Click , 2010 .

[82]  Aime A. Levesque,et al.  Using Clickers to Facilitate Development of Problem-Solving Skills , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[83]  Usenime M. Akpanudo,et al.  The Effect of Clickers in University Science Courses , 2012, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[84]  K. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum. , 2011, Advances in physiology education.