Sub-Planck structure in phase space and its relevance for quantum decoherence

Heisenberg's principle states that the product of uncertainties of position and momentum should be no less than the limit set by Planck's constant, [planck]/2. This is usually taken to imply that phase space structures associated with sub-Planck scales (≪[planck]) do not exist, or at least that they do not matter. Here I show that this common assumption is false: non-local quantum superpositions (or ‘Schrödinger's cat’ states) that are confined to a phase space volume characterized by the classical action A, much larger than [planck], develop spotty structure on the sub-Planck scale, a = [planck]2/A. Structure saturates on this scale particularly quickly in quantum versions of classically chaotic systems—such as gases that are modelled by chaotic scattering of molecules—because their exponential sensitivity to perturbations causes them to be driven into non-local ‘cat’ states. Most importantly, these sub-Planck scales are physically significant: a determines the sensitivity of a quantum system or environment to perturbations. Therefore, this scale controls the effectiveness of decoherence and the selection of preferred pointer states by the environment. It will also be relevant in setting limits on the sensitivity of quantum meters.

[1]  I. Stamatescu,et al.  Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory , 1996 .

[2]  P. Miller,et al.  Signatures of chaos in the entanglement of two coupled quantum kicked tops. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[3]  M. Berry,et al.  Quantization of linear maps on a torus-fresnel diffraction by a periodic grating , 1980 .

[4]  W. Zurek Environment-induced superselection rules , 1982 .

[5]  M. Scully,et al.  Distribution functions in physics: Fundamentals , 1984 .

[6]  Zurek,et al.  Decoherence, chaos, and the second law. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[7]  Wojciech H. Zurek Decoherence, chaos, quantum-classical correspondence, and the algorithmic arrow of time , 1998 .

[8]  W. Zurek Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical , 2001, quant-ph/0105127.

[9]  M. V. Berry,et al.  Evolution of Wigner's phase-space density under a nonintegrable quantum map , 1981 .

[10]  Zbyszek P. Karkuszewski,et al.  Breakdown of correspondence in chaotic systems: Ehrenfest versus localization times , 2000, nlin/0012048.

[11]  M. Berry Evolution of semiclassical quantum states in phase space , 1979 .

[12]  W. Heisenberg Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik , 1927 .

[13]  Jonathan J. Halliwell,et al.  Physical origins of time asymmetry , 1995 .

[14]  W. Zurek Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse? , 1981 .

[15]  F. Haake,et al.  Universality of decoherence. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[16]  E. Joos,et al.  The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment , 1985 .

[17]  Salman Habib,et al.  Decoherence, chaos, and the correspondence principle , 1998 .

[18]  A. Leggett,et al.  Path integral approach to quantum Brownian motion , 1983 .

[19]  Giulio Casati,et al.  Quantum chaos : between order and disorder , 1995 .

[20]  G. P. Berman,et al.  Condition of stochasticity in quantum nonlinear systems , 1978 .

[21]  F. Khalili,et al.  Quantum nondemolition measurements: the route from toys to tools , 1996 .

[22]  W. Zurek The Environment, Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical , 1991 .

[23]  F. Haake Quantum signatures of chaos , 1991 .