Well posedness conditions for Bimodal Piecewise Affine Systems

Abstract This paper considers well-posedness (the existence and uniqueness of the solutions) of Bimodal Piecewise Affine Systems in R n . It is assumed that both modes are observable, but only one of the modes is in observable canonical form. This allows the vector field to be discontinuous when the trajectories change mode. Necessary and sufficient conditions for well-posedness are given as a set of algebraic conditions and sign inequalities. It is shown that these conditions induce a joint structure for the system matrices of the two modes. This structure can be used for the classification of well-posed bimodal piecewise affine systems. Furthermore, it is also shown that, under certain conditions, well-posed Bimodal Piecewise Affine Systems in R n may have one or two equilibrium points or no equilibrium points.

[1]  Qingdu Li,et al.  Chaos in three-dimensional hybrid systems and design of chaos generators , 2012 .

[2]  Kenji Kashima,et al.  Piecewise affine systems approach to control of biological networks , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  Shouchuan Hu.  Differential equations with discontinuous right-hand sides☆ , 1991 .

[4]  Shinji Hara,et al.  Stability tests and stabilization for piecewise linear systems based on poles and zeros of subsystems , 2006, Autom..

[5]  Johannes Schumacher,et al.  An Introduction to Hybrid Dynamical Systems, Springer Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 251 , 1999 .

[6]  Pieter J. Mosterman,et al.  Hybrid Dynamic Systems , 2007, Handbook of Dynamic System Modeling.

[7]  J. Cortés.  Discontinuous dynamical systems , 2008, IEEE Control Systems.

[8]  Enrique Ponce,et al.  Bifurcation of Invariant cones in Piecewise Linear Homogeneous Systems , 2005, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[9]  Janan Zaytoon.  Hybrid Dynamic Systems , 2007 .

[10]  Jun-ichi Imura,et al.  Characterization of well-posedness of piecewise-linear systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[11]  K. Camlibel.  Well-posed bimodal piecewise linear systems do not exhibit Zeno behavior , 2008 .

[12]  Hai Lin,et al.  Null controllability of planar bimodal piecewise linear systems , 2011, Int. J. Control.

[13]  J. Imura.  Classification and stabilizability analysis of bimodal piecewise affine systems , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[14]  M. Kanat Camlibel,et al.  On the existence, uniqueness and nature of Carathéodory and Filippov solutions for bimodal piecewise affine dynamical systems , 2012, Syst. Control. Lett..

[15]  M. Kanat Camlibel,et al.  Algebraic Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for the Controllability of Conewise Linear Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  Vincent Acary,et al.  Switching, relay and complementarity systems: A tutorial on their well-posedness and relationships , 2012 .

[17]  Mario di Bernardo,et al.  Piecewise smooth dynamical systems , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[18]  M. Kanat Camlibel,et al.  Continuous Piecewise Affine Dynamical Systems do not Exhibit Zeno Behavior , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[19]  Fernando Fernández-Sánchez,et al.  Existence of a Reversible T-Point Heteroclinic Cycle in a Piecewise Linear Version of the Michelson System , 2008, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[20]  M. Kanat Camlibel,et al.  A full characterization of stabilizability of bimodal piecewise linear systems with scalar inputs , 2008, Autom..

[21]  Daniel Liberzon,et al.  Switching in Systems and Control , 2003, Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications.

[22]  Zhendong Sun,et al.  Stability of piecewise linear systems revisited , 2010, Annu. Rev. Control..

[23]  Kok Lay Teo,et al.  Well-posedness of bimodal state-based switched systems , 2008, Appl. Math. Lett..

[24]  M. Kanat Camlibel,et al.  Conewise Linear Systems: Non-Zenoness and Observability , 2006, SIAM J. Control. Optim..