Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration
暂无分享,去创建一个
Andriy I. Bandos | Unni Haakenaasen | Per Skaane | Randi Gullien | Solveig Hofvind | Mina Izadi | P. Skaane | S. Hofvind | I. Jebsen | R. Gullien | Ellen B Eben | Ulrika Ekseth | U. Haakenaasen | Mina Izadi | Gunnar Jahr | Mona Krager | Ellen B. Eben | Ulrika Ekseth | Ingvild N. Jebsen | Gunnar Jahr | Mona Krager | A. Bandos | Randi Gullien
[1] David Gur,et al. Localized detection and classification of abnormalities on FFDM and tomosynthesis examinations rated under an FROC paradigm. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[2] Breast screening: the use of consensus opinion for all recalls. , 2004, Breast.
[3] R. Edward Hendrick,et al. Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography , 2013, European Radiology.
[4] A. Verbeek,et al. A remarkable reduction of breast cancer deaths in screened versus unscreened women: a case-referent study , 2010, Cancer Causes & Control.
[5] Unni Haakenaasen,et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting , 2012, Acta radiologica.
[6] Tao Wu,et al. A new generation FFDM/tomosynthesis fusion system with selenium detector , 2010, Medical Imaging.
[7] L. Tabár,et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. , 2011, Radiology.
[8] P. Skaane,et al. Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading , 2008, European Radiology.
[9] Per Skaane,et al. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program--the Oslo II Study. , 2004, Radiology.
[10] David Gur,et al. Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study. , 2012, Academic radiology.
[11] Per Skaane,et al. Screening-detected breast cancers: discordant independent double reading in a population-based screening program. , 2009, Radiology.
[12] S. Moss,et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: findings of a systematic review. , 2001, Breast.
[13] David Gur,et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[14] T M Svahn,et al. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.
[15] Melanie Pinet,et al. Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[16] S. Ciatto,et al. Second reading of screening mammograms increases cancer detection and recall rates. Results in the Florence screening programme , 2005, Journal of medical screening.
[17] S. Ciatto,et al. The role of arbitration of discordant reports at double reading of screening mammograms , 2005, Journal of medical screening.
[18] Alan C. Evans,et al. The pathological and radiological features of screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed following arbitration of discordant double reading opinions. , 2005, Clinical radiology.
[19] C E Metz,et al. Gains in Accuracy from Replicated Readings of Diagnostic Images , 1992, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[20] Paolo Peterlongo,et al. Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[21] Gisella Gennaro,et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study , 2010, European Radiology.
[22] I Andersson,et al. The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.
[23] Eugenio Paci,et al. Summary of the Evidence of Breast Cancer Service Screening Outcomes in Europe and First Estimate of the Benefit and Harm Balance Sheet , 2012, Journal of medical screening.
[24] P E Shile,et al. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. , 1996, Academic radiology.
[25] H. Fenlon,et al. Consensus review of discordant findings maximizes cancer detection rate in double-reader screening mammography: Irish National Breast Screening Program experience. , 2009, Radiology.
[26] Craig A. Beam,et al. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.
[27] Federica Zanca,et al. Two-view and single-view tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: high-resolution X-ray imaging observer study. , 2012, Radiology.
[28] Andriy I. Bandos,et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. , 2013, Radiology.
[29] Kenneth G. A. Gilhuijs,et al. Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results , 2009, European Radiology.
[30] David Gur,et al. Time to diagnosis and performance levels during repeat interpretations of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary observations. , 2010, Academic radiology.
[31] C P Lawinski,et al. A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2012, Clinical radiology.
[32] Anders Tingberg,et al. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings , 2008, European Radiology.
[33] Tor D Tosteson,et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[34] Per Skaane,et al. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study. , 2003, Radiology.
[35] EUROSCREENWorking Group,et al. Summary of the evidence of breast cancer service screening outcomes in Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm balance sheet , 2012 .
[36] Harry J de Koning,et al. Independent double reading of screening mammograms in The Netherlands: effect of arbitration following reader disagreements. , 2004, Radiology.
[37] Peilin Wu,et al. Preliminary Observations , 1830, The Medico-chirurgical review.
[38] D Gur,et al. Observer variation and the performance accuracy gained by averaging ratings of abnormality. , 2000, Medical physics.