Peer to peer support: the disappearing work in the doctoral student experience

This paper reflects on the importance of study groups in contributing to a positive postgraduate experience and explores specific concepts, such as ‘disappearing behaviours’ in contrasting the ‘official’ languages of universities with the beneficial behaviours found through study groups. Additionally the paper advocates the systematic inclusion of strategies such as study groups in the postgraduate experience. Funding arrangements and research frameworks for higher education in Australia focus on student progress and completion, as well as comparison of research quality within and between universities. As a result, there is a significant emphasis on timely completion of postgraduate degrees. This paper posits that there is an apparent contradiction between the indicators of success in this area, such as completion rates and annual progress reports and the positive contribution that study groups can make to the doctoral student experience.

[1]  D. Boud,et al.  ‘Peer learning’ as pedagogic discourse for research education 1 , 2005 .

[2]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[3]  T. Clark,et al.  Within and Beyond Communities of Practice: Making Sense of Learning Through Participation, Identity and Practice , 2006 .

[4]  Chun Wei Choo.  The Knowing Organization as Learning Organization. , 2001 .

[5]  Jörgen Sandberg,et al.  Invisible Management: The Social Construction of Leadership , 2000 .

[6]  M. Campbell.  Institutional Ethnography and Experience as Data , 1998 .

[7]  G. Kendall.  The Crisis in Doctoral Education: A sociological diagnosis , 2002 .

[8]  Ruth Neumann,et al.  Diversity, Doctoral Education and Policy , 2002 .

[9]  Rocky Ross,et al.  Mental models , 2004, SIGA.

[10]  Joyce K. Fletcher,et al.  Disappearing Acts: Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work , 2001 .

[11]  E. Jantsch.  The self-organizing universe : scientific and human implications of the emerging paradigm of evolution , 1980 .

[12]  Dimaggio,et al.  Structures of capital : the social organization of the economy , 1990 .

[13]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Communication and organizations : an interpretive approach , 1985 .

[14]  Yaritza Ferrer de Valero.  Departmental Factors Affecting Time-to-Degree and Completion Rates of Doctoral Students at One Land-Grant Research Institution , 2001 .

[15]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: an integrative framework for action and research , 2006 .

[16]  I. Bakker.  The strategic silence : gender and economic policy , 1994 .

[17]  T. Krieshok,et al.  The Soul of Work , 2002 .

[18]  Parlo Singh,et al.  Doctoral Education, Danger and Risk Management , 2002 .

[19]  K. Weick.  Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[20]  Robyn Barnacle,et al.  Research education ontologies: exploring doctoral becoming , 2005 .

[21]  Patricia Shaw,et al.  Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? , 2002 .

[22]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models , 1989 .

[23]  L. Conrad.  Developing the Intellectual and Emotional Climate for Candidates , 2007 .

[24]  R. Stacey.  Complexity and Creativity in Organizations , 1996 .

[25]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[26]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .