Reduced interhemispheric inhibition in musicians

Abstract. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging has revealed that the anterior half of the corpus callosum is larger in musicians trained intensively from an early age than in untrained subjects. The corpus callosum is crucial for the coordination of bimanual motor activity, but neurophysiological correlates of morphological differences in the corpus callosum of musicians are not known. In the present study we have used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess interhemispheric inhibition in six adult professional musicians who began musical training at an early age. Conditioning TMS was applied to the hand area of the motor cortex of one hemisphere, followed 4–16 ms later by a test stimulus applied to the other hemisphere. Tests were performed at rest, and with the first dorsal interosseous muscle contralateral to the conditioning hemisphere voluntarily active. Conditioning TMS in musicians was 29% less effective at reducing the size of the test MEP at rest, and 63% less effective in the active condition, compared with control subjects. We conclude that transcallosal interhemispheric inhibitory circuits activated by TMS are less effective in musicians than in controls.

[1]  P. Rakić,et al.  Development of the corpus callosum and cavum septi in man , 1968, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  J. Staiger,et al.  Increased corpus callosum size in musicians , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  V H Denenberg,et al.  A developmental study of sex and age interactions in the human corpus callosum. , 1992, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[4]  B. Meyer,et al.  Inhibitory and excitatory interhemispheric transfers between motor cortical areas in normal humans and patients with abnormalities of the corpus callosum. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  M. A. Jeeves,et al.  Bimanual co-ordination in callosal agenesis and partial commissurotomy , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  R. Nass,et al.  Mirror movement asymmetries in congenital hemiparesis: the inhibition hypothesis revisited. , 1985, Neurology.

[7]  K. Connolly,et al.  Developmental Changes in Associated Movements , 1968, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[8]  K Matsunami,et al.  Effects of stimulation of corpus callosum on precentral neuron activity in the awake monkey. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  C. Marsden,et al.  Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  H. Asanuma,et al.  Effects of transcallosal volleys on pyramidal tract cell activity of cat. , 1962, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Ichiro Kanazawa,et al.  Interhemispheric facilitation of the hand area of the human motor cortex , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  M. Jeeves,et al.  Role of the corpus callosum in the development of a bimanual motor skill , 1988 .

[14]  M S Gazzaniga,et al.  The disconnection syndrome. Basic findings reaffirmed. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  J. Kaas,et al.  The relationship of corpus callosum connections to electrical stimulation maps of motor, supplementary motor, and the frontal eye fields in owl monkeys , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  S. Röricht,et al.  Topography of fibers in the human corpus callosum mediating interhemispheric inhibition between the motor cortices , 1998, Annals of neurology.

[17]  E. Ross,et al.  Topography of the Human Corpus Callosum , 1985, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.