Standard Flow Liquid Chromatography for Shotgun Proteomics in Bioenergy Research

Over the past 10 years, the bioenergy field has realized significant achievements that have encouraged many follow on efforts centered on biosynthetic production of fuel-like compounds. Key to the success of these efforts has been transformational developments in feedstock characterization and metabolic engineering of biofuel-producing microbes. Lagging far behind these advancements are analytical methods to characterize and quantify systems of interest to the bioenergy field. In particular, the utilization of proteomics, while valuable for identifying novel enzymes and diagnosing problems associated with biofuel-producing microbes, is limited by a lack of robustness and limited throughput. Nano-flow liquid chromatography coupled to high-mass accuracy, high-resolution mass spectrometers has become the dominant approach for the analysis of complex proteomic samples, yet such assays still require dedicated experts for data acquisition, analysis, and instrument upkeep. The recent adoption of standard flow chromatography (ca. 0.5 mL/min) for targeted proteomics has highlighted the robust nature and increased throughput of this approach for sample analysis. Consequently, we assessed the applicability of standard flow liquid chromatography for shotgun proteomics using samples from Escherichia coli and Arabidopsis thaliana, organisms commonly used as model systems for lignocellulosic biofuels research. Employing 120 min gradients with standard flow chromatography, we were able to routinely identify nearly 800 proteins from E. coli samples; while for samples from Arabidopsis, over 1,000 proteins could be reliably identified. An examination of identified peptides indicated that the method was suitable for reproducible applications in shotgun proteomics. Standard flow liquid chromatography for shotgun proteomics provides a robust approach for the analysis of complex samples. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to validate the standard flow approach for shotgun proteomics.

[1]  Michele Magrane,et al.  UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data , 2011, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[2]  R. Murphy,et al.  Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of , 2000, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[3]  C. N. Stewart,et al.  Enhanced characteristics of genetically modified switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) for high biofuel production , 2013, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[4]  Keith E. J. Tyo,et al.  Expanding the metabolic engineering toolbox: more options to engineer cells. , 2007, Trends in biotechnology.

[5]  N. W. Davis,et al.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. , 1997, Science.

[6]  J. Yates,et al.  Protein identification at the low femtomole level from silver-stained gels using a new fritless electrospray interface for liquid chromatography-microspray and nanospray mass spectrometry. , 1998, Analytical biochemistry.

[7]  Michael E. Swartz,et al.  UPLC TM : An Introduction and Review , 2005 .

[8]  B. Simmons,et al.  Structural and Chemical Characterization of Hardwood from Tree Species with Applications as Bioenergy Feedstocks , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  Bernhard Knierim,et al.  Isolation and Proteomic Characterization of the Arabidopsis Golgi Defines Functional and Novel Components Involved in Plant Cell Wall Biosynthesis1[W][OA] , 2012, Plant Physiology.

[10]  C. G. Edmonds,et al.  Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. , 1990, Methods in enzymology.

[11]  Seema Singh,et al.  Biosynthesis and incorporation of side-chain-truncated lignin monomers to reduce lignin polymerization and enhance saccharification. , 2012, Plant biotechnology journal.

[12]  D. Fabris,et al.  Current-controlled nanospray ionization mass spectrometry , 2009, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[13]  C. Borchers,et al.  Comparison of standard- and nano-flow liquid chromatography platforms for MRM-based quantitation of putative plasma biomarker proteins , 2012, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[14]  A. Millar,et al.  Analysis of the Arabidopsis cytosolic proteome highlights subcellular partitioning of central plant metabolism. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[15]  J. Heazlewood,et al.  Separation of the plant Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum by free-flow electrophoresis. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[16]  Yan Liang,et al.  Lignin bioengineering. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[17]  Timothy S. Ham,et al.  Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuels production: from bugs to synthetic biology to fuels. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[18]  D. N. Perkins,et al.  Probability‐based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[19]  Tanya Z. Berardini,et al.  The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  J. Keasling.  Synthetic biology for synthetic chemistry. , 2008, ACS chemical biology.

[21]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering Yeast Transcription Machinery for Improved Ethanol Tolerance and Production , 2006, Science.

[22]  The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative.  Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana , 2000, Nature.

[23]  R. Aebersold,et al.  A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  Alexey I Nesvizhskii,et al.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. , 2002, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  H. Christofk,et al.  A label‐free quantification method by MS/MS TIC compared to SILAC and spectral counting in a proteomics screen , 2008, Proteomics.

[26]  Shibdas Banerjee,et al.  Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry: A Technique to Access the Information beyond the Molecular Weight of the Analyte , 2011, International journal of analytical chemistry.

[27]  Linfeng Wu,et al.  Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics , 2010, Expert review of proteomics.

[28]  J. Keasling,et al.  Expression of a bacterial 3‐dehydroshikimate dehydratase reduces lignin content and improves biomass saccharification efficiency , 2015, Plant biotechnology journal.

[29]  Michael E. Swartz,et al.  UPLC™: An Introduction and Review , 2005 .

[30]  Charles E. Wyman,et al.  Investigating plant cell wall components that affect biomass recalcitrance in poplar and switchgrass , 2013 .

[31]  R. Caprioli,et al.  Micro-electrospray mass spectrometry: Ultra-high-sensitivity analysis of peptides and proteins , 1994, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.