Undetactable levels of genotoxicity of SiO2 nanoparticles in in vitro and in vivo tests

Background Silica dioxide (SiO2) has been used in various industrial products, including paints and coatings, plastics, synthetic rubbers, and adhesives. Several studies have investigated the genotoxic effects of SiO2; however, the results remain controversial due to variations in the evaluation methods applied in determining its physicochemical properties. Thus, well characterized chemicals and standardized methods are needed for better assessment of the genotoxicity of nanoparticles. Methods The genotoxicity of SiO2 was evaluated using two types of well characterized SiO2, ie, 20 nm (−) charge (SiO EN20(−)2) and 100 nm (−) charge (SiO EN100(−)2). Four end point genotoxicity tests, ie, the bacterial mutation assay, in vitro chromosomal aberration test, in vivo comet assay, and in vivo micronucleus test, were conducted following the test guidelines of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) with application of Good Laboratory Practice. Results No statistically significant differences were found in the bacterial mutation assay, in vitro chromosomal aberration test, in vivo comet assay, and in vivo micronucleus test when tested for induction of genotoxicity in both two types of SiO2 nanoparticles. Conclusion These results suggest that SiO2 nanoparticles, in particular SiO2EN20(−) and SiO2EN100(−), are not genotoxic in both in vitro and in vivo systems under OECD guidelines. Further, the results were generated in accordance with OECD test guidelines, and Good Laboratory Practice application; it can be accepted as reliable information regarding SiO2-induced genotoxicity.

[1]  Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development,et al.  Organisation for economic cooperation and development , 1998 .

[2]  Min Ho Lee,et al.  Colloidal Properties of Surface Coated Colloidal Silica Nanoparticles in Aqueous and Physiological Solutions , 2014 .

[3]  郑俊海,et al.  科技期刊稿件处理的精细化管理——《International Journal of Nanomedicine〉〉投稿体会 , 2014 .

[4]  Hyun Cheol Bae,et al.  Effect of the size and surface charge of silica nanoparticles on cutaneous toxicity , 2013, Molecular & Cellular Toxicology.

[5]  Q. Tao,et al.  Physiological pathway of human cell damage induced by genotoxic crystalline silica nanoparticles. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[6]  Kyung-Taek Rim,et al.  Effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles to inflammation and oxidative DNA damages in H9c2 cells , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Toxicology.

[7]  V. Paget,et al.  Toxicity and genotoxicity of nano-SiO2 on human epithelial intestinal HT-29 cell line. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  Stefan Pfuhler,et al.  Silica nanoparticles administered at the maximum tolerated dose induce genotoxic effects through an inflammatory reaction while gold nanoparticles do not. , 2012, Mutation research.

[9]  G. Jenkins,et al.  In vitro genotoxicity testing strategy for nanomaterials and the adaptation of current OECD guidelines , 2012, Mutation research.

[10]  Douglas Gilliland,et al.  Amorphous silica nanoparticles do not induce cytotoxicity, cell transformation or genotoxicity in Balb/3T3 mouse fibroblasts. , 2012, Mutation research.

[11]  Min-gu Kang,et al.  Effects of carbon black to inflammation and oxidative DNA damages in mouse macrophages , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Toxicology.

[12]  Dermot Kelleher,et al.  Activation of stress-related signalling pathway in human cells upon SiO2 nanoparticles exposure as an early indicator of cytotoxicity , 2011, Journal of nanobiotechnology.

[13]  Meyoung-kon Kim,et al.  A safety assessment of phototoxicity and sensitization of SiO2 nanoparticles , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Toxicology.

[14]  Wim H de Jong,et al.  Genotoxicity evaluation of amorphous silica nanoparticles of different sizes using the micronucleus and the plasmid lacZ gene mutation assay , 2011, Nanotoxicology.

[15]  Alok Dhawan,et al.  Cellular uptake and mutagenic potential of metal oxide nanoparticles in bacterial cells. , 2011, Chemosphere.

[16]  David Kirkland,et al.  A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins. , 2011, Mutation research.

[17]  B. Bay,et al.  Current Studies into the Genotoxic Effects of Nanomaterials , 2010, Journal of nucleic acids.

[18]  Saber M Hussain,et al.  Metal-based nanoparticles and their toxicity assessment. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[19]  Moonjung Choi,et al.  Cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, and innate immune response of silica-titania hollow nanoparticles based on size and surface functionality. , 2010, ACS nano.

[20]  Jae-Chun Ryu,et al.  Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of nano-silver in mammalian cell lines , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Toxicology.

[21]  Jiang-Jen Lin,et al.  Evaluation on cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the exfoliated silicate nanoclay. , 2010, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[22]  X. Pan,et al.  Mutagenicity evaluation of metal oxide nanoparticles by the bacterial reverse mutation assay. , 2010, Chemosphere.

[23]  M. Miller Agency , 2010 .

[24]  Jianjun Liu,et al.  SiO2 nanoparticles induce cytotoxicity and protein expression alteration in HaCaT cells , 2010, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[25]  Jinhee Choi,et al.  Oxidative stress of silica nanoparticles in human bronchial epithelial cell, Beas-2B. , 2009, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[26]  Sabine Neuss,et al.  Gold nanoparticles of diameter 1.4 nm trigger necrosis by oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. , 2009, Small.

[27]  Chao Liu,et al.  Comparative study of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and genotoxicity induced by four typical nanomaterials: the role of particle size, shape and composition , 2009, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[28]  S. Maenosono,et al.  Mutagenicity of water-soluble ZnO nanoparticles in Ames test. , 2007, The Journal of toxicological sciences.

[29]  R. L. Jones,et al.  Unique cellular interaction of silver nanoparticles: size-dependent generation of reactive oxygen species. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[30]  Iseult Lynch,et al.  Reproducible comet assay of amorphous silica nanoparticles detects no genotoxicity. , 2008, Nano letters.

[31]  星野 昭芳,et al.  Physicochemical properties and cellular toxicity of nanocrystal quantum dots depend on their surface modification , 2008 .

[32]  M. Bawendi,et al.  Renal clearance of quantum dots , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[33]  B. Sanderson,et al.  Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of ultrafine crystalline SiO2 particulate in cultured human lymphoblastoid cells , 2007, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[34]  Stephen M. Roberts,et al.  Characterization of the size, shape, and state of dispersion of nanoparticles for toxicological studies , 2007 .

[35]  Jim E Riviere,et al.  Surface coatings determine cytotoxicity and irritation potential of quantum dot nanoparticles in epidermal keratinocytes. , 2007, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[36]  Thomas Kuhlbusch,et al.  Particle and Fibre Toxicology BioMed Central Review The potential risks of nanomaterials: a review carried out for ECETOC , 2006 .

[37]  S. Schürch,et al.  Interaction of fine particles and nanoparticles with red blood cells visualized with advanced microscopic techniques. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  Scott C. Brown,et al.  Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials. Part VI. Characterization of nanoscale particles for toxicological evaluation. , 2006, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[39]  Julie W. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy , 2005, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[40]  K. Jan,et al.  Ultrafine titanium dioxide particles in the absence of photoactivation can induce oxidative damage to human bronchial epithelial cells. , 2005, Toxicology.

[41]  Paul R. Lockman,et al.  Nanoparticle Surface Charges Alter Blood–Brain Barrier Integrity and Permeability , 2004, Journal of drug targeting.

[42]  Vincent M Rotello,et al.  Toxicity of gold nanoparticles functionalized with cationic and anionic side chains. , 2004, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[43]  David Brown,et al.  The pulmonary toxicology of ultrafine particles. , 2002, Journal of aerosol medicine : the official journal of the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine.

[44]  K. Donaldson,et al.  Impairment of alveolar macrophage phagocytosis by ultrafine particles. , 2001, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[45]  OECD GUIDELINE FOR TESTING OF CHEMICALS Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test , 1999 .

[46]  Sac-fry Stages,et al.  OECD GUIDELINE FOR TESTING OF CHEMICALS , 2002 .

[47]  R. Tice,et al.  A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. , 1988, Experimental cell research.

[48]  W Schmid,et al.  The micronucleus test. , 1975, Mutation research.