With a Little Help From Your Students: A New Model for Faculty Development and Online Course Design

Institutions of higher education are faced with the challenge of developing faculty who are ready, willing, and able to teach online. Standard approaches towards faculty development often miss the dynamic and complex relationship between content, pedagogy, and technology. Our approach has faculty members and graduate students participate in a unique seminar where they work collaboratively to design online courses. We describe our “learning by design” approach and present evidence of how this approach respects the realities and complexities of teaching online. We use evidence from multiple sources (interviews, surveys, observations, and artifacts developed) to develop a model of online teaching that posits successful courses require the careful integration of three components that coconstrain each other: content, pedagogy, and technology. The late Douglas Adams (1997), author of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, uncovered an important principle relevant to educational technology—The Someone Else’s Problem (SEP) field. The SEP is a fictional technology that can make something “virtually invisible” because we think it is somebody else’s problem. It is not that the object in question really vanishes. It does not. It may in fact even catch you by surprise out of the corner of your eye. The idea of the SEP is that once we consider something as being outside of the arena of our concerns, that something, for all practical

[1]  D. Schoen The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[2]  A. Stevenson,et al.  The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work , 1981 .

[3]  Esteban Krotz The Essential tensión: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change , 1980 .

[4]  J. Dewey,et al.  Knowing and the Known , 1949 .

[5]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[6]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[7]  Tom Clark,et al.  Attitudes of higher education faculty toward distance education: A national survey , 1993 .

[8]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth Edition , 1982 .

[9]  D. Perkins Knowledge As Design , 1986 .

[10]  Ruth Garner Hanging Out: Community-Based After-School Programs for Children , 2002 .

[11]  Louise M. Rosenblatt The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work , 1978 .

[12]  G. Cziko,et al.  Teacher Adoption of Technology: A Perceptual Control Theory Perspective , 2001 .

[13]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Middle Works, 1899-1924 , 1976 .

[14]  Bertram C. Bruce Critical Issues Literacy Technologies: What Stance Should We Take? , 1997 .

[15]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Software Design as a Learning Environment , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[16]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[17]  Connie L. Dillon,et al.  Faculty: The Neglected Resource in Distance Education , 1992 .

[18]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Learning Networks: A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online , 1995 .

[19]  L. Kimball Managing Distance Learning — New Challenges for Faculty , 1998 .

[20]  Rob Foshay,et al.  Web-based education: A reality check , 2000 .

[21]  Barbara L. Loeding,et al.  Distance Learning Planning, Preparation, and Presentation: Instructors' Perspectives , 1999 .

[22]  Gerard George,et al.  Managing Instructor Cyberanxiety: The Role of Self-Efficacy in Decreasing Resistance to Change. , 1996 .

[23]  David R. Topper,et al.  The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change by Thomas S. Kuhn (review) , 1978 .

[24]  L. A. Hausman How we Think , 1921 .

[25]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[26]  C. P. Snow,et al.  The two cultures , 2006, Nature.