Learning and product entry: : How diversification patterns differ over firm age and knowledge domains in U.S. generic drug industry

This study uses learning theory to show how knowledge domains affect product extension decisions and how these product decisions change as firms age. Faced with the choice of new product-markets, a firm might decide to introduce a similar product, by leveraging existing firm knowledge, or to experiment with a less familiar product, which requires new knowledge. Using data on new drug introductions in the US generic pharmaceutical industry, the analyses showed clear support for heterogeneous product-market entry patterns across knowledge domains as the firm ages. Across time, the form of learning shifts from exploration to exploitation

[1]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Are More Good Things Better, or Will Technical and Market Capabilities Conflict When a Firm Expands? , 1992 .

[2]  B. Silverman,et al.  Why Firms Want to Organize Efficiently and what Keeps Them from Doing So: Inappropriate Governance, Performance, and Adaptation in a Deregulated Industry , 2003 .

[3]  Michael Gort,et al.  Firm and Product Life Cycles and Firm Survival , 2002 .

[4]  Jodi S. Goodman,et al.  Organization-Level Determinants of Women in Management , 1994 .

[5]  Christopher B. Bingham,et al.  How firms learn heuristics: Uncovering missing components of organizational learning , 2012 .

[6]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle , 1984 .

[7]  S. Winter,et al.  Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence , 1994 .

[8]  F. Morton,et al.  Entry decisions in the generic pharmaceutical industry. , 1999, The Rand journal of economics.

[9]  Heather A. Haveman.  Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[10]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[11]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Strategy formulation processes: Differences in perceptions of strength and weaknesses indicators and environmental uncertainty by managerial level , 1987 .

[12]  Kyle J. Mayer,et al.  Antecedents and Performance Implications of Contracting for Knowledge Workers: Evidence from Information Technology Services , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[14]  Erwin Danneels.  The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[15]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[16]  Christopher B. Bingham,et al.  Rational heuristics: the ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience , 2011 .

[17]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[18]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  Rigidity in Decision Behaviors: A Within-Subject Test of Information Acquisition Using Strategic and Financial Informational Cues , 1994 .

[19]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[20]  S. Floyd,et al.  Group influence activities and the performance of strategic initiatives , 2012 .

[21]  Lucio Fuentelsaz,et al.  Multipoint competition, strategic similarity and entry into geographic markets , 2006 .

[22]  David S. Evans.  The Relationship between Firm Growth, Size, and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries. , 1987 .

[23]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  THE PROCESS OF TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETENCE LEVERAGING , 2007 .

[24]  Fabrice Cavarretta,et al.  Who Changes Course? The Role of Domain Knowledge and Novel Framing in Making Technology Changes , 2012 .

[25]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Incumbent Entry into New Market Niches: The Role of Experience and Managerial Choice in the Creation of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[26]  B. Kogut,et al.  Technological Platforms and Diversification , 1996 .

[27]  Sea Jin Chang,et al.  AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE ON DIVERSIFICATION AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING: ENTRY, EXIT, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE DURING 1981–89 , 1996 .

[28]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[29]  Heather A. Haveman.  Organizational size and change: Diversification in the savings and loan industry after deregulation , 1993 .

[30]  J. Dutton,et al.  Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action , 1987 .

[31]  C. Clogg,et al.  Statistical Methods for Comparing Regression Coefficients Between Models , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  The genesis of strategy in new ventures: escaping the constraints of founder and team knowledge , 2012 .

[33]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  A stage-contingent model of design and growth for technology based new ventures , 1990 .

[34]  Thomas J. Cottrell,et al.  Product Variety and Firm Survival in the Microcomputer Software Industry , 2004 .

[35]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[36]  J. L. Stimpert,et al.  IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER: CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF RELATEDNESS HELD BY THE MANAGERS OF LARGE DIVERSIFIED FIRMS , 1997 .

[37]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[38]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .