An Adaptive Sequential Procedure for Efficient Optimization of the Sheet Metal Spinning Process

Due to technological advances in science, the complexity of processes under investigation increased continuously in recent years. For example, in mechanical engineering, there are often highly nonlinear input–output relationships combined with a large number of constraints. Sheet metal spinning is one example of such a production process. Many flexible and powerful methods to global optimization have been developed. In this paper, a sequential approach originally developed for computer experiments will be adopted and applied to optimize the spinning process based on physical experiments. This approach sequentially refines the model by adding new design points based on the expected improvement criterion. This criterion balances the need to observe at the predicted optimum with the need to investigate the design space in areas of high uncertainty. However to guarantee an efficient optimization of the spinning process, this approach has to be embedded in a more substantial procedure. One reason for this is the liability of workpiece failure for most of the operable design space. Since the shape of the failure region is unknown, many missing observations have to be expected when exploring the design space. The other reason is the need to incorporate available process knowledge of sheet metal spinning to improve the efficiency in optimization. The main problem in implementing this information is a changing process behavior for different geometries and materials used. Hence, if a component with a new geometry has to be optimized, it is difficult to include available process knowledge. In this paper, an adaptive sequential optimization procedure (ASOP) is presented to cope with these problems in order to guarantee an efficient optimization of such complex processes. The approach is exemplified by optimizing the spinning process for a fixed geometry. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  G. Derringer,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables , 1980 .

[2]  Cristina H. Amon,et al.  An engineering design methodology with multistage Bayesian surrogates and optimal sampling , 1996 .

[3]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[4]  G. G. Wang,et al.  Adaptive Response Surface Method Using Inherited Latin Hypercube Design Points , 2003 .

[5]  Stefan Wess,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning Technology: From Foundations to Applications , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[6]  Mehmet H. Göker Designing Industrial Case-Based Reasoning Applications , 2004, ECCBR.

[7]  H. Kantz,et al.  Combined Methods for the Prediction of Dynamic Instabilities in Sheet Metal Spinning , 2002 .

[8]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[9]  D. Dennis,et al.  A statistical method for global optimization , 1992, [Proceedings] 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  M. E. Johnson,et al.  Minimax and maximin distance designs , 1990 .

[11]  T. Simpson,et al.  Fuzzy clustering based hierarchical metamodeling for design space reduction and optimization , 2004 .

[12]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[13]  Werner Homberg,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Sheet Metal Forming by Spinning (7th ICTP小特集号) -- (Outstanding Papers and Presentations) , 2003 .

[14]  A. J. Booker,et al.  A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates , 1998 .

[15]  William J. Welch,et al.  Computer experiments and global optimization , 1997 .

[16]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Global versus local search in constrained optimization of computer models , 1998 .