Sensors Model Student Self Concept in the Classroom

In this paper we explore findings from three experiments that use minimally invasive sensors with a web based geometry tutor to create a user model. Minimally invasive sensor technology is mature enough to equip classrooms of up to 25 students with four sensors at the same time while using a computer based intelligent tutoring system. The sensors, which are on each student's chair, mouse, monitor, and wrist, provide data about posture, movement, grip tension, arousal, and facially expressed mental states. This data may provide adaptive feedback to an intelligent tutoring system based on an individual student's affective states. The experiments show that when sensor data supplements a user model based on tutor logs, the model reflects a larger percentage of the students' self-concept than a user model based on the tutor logs alone. The models are further expanded to classify four ranges of emotional self-concept including frustration, interest, confidence, and excitement with over 78% accuracy. The emotional predictions are a first step for intelligent tutor systems to create sensor based personalized feedback for each student in a classroom environment. Bringing sensors to our children's schools addresses real problems of students' relationship to mathematics as they are learning the subject.

[1]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Past, Present, and Future. , 1994 .

[2]  Sophia Catsambis The Path to Math: Gender and Racial-Ethnic Differences in Mathematics Participation from Middle School to High School. , 1994 .

[3]  Yuan Qi,et al.  Context-sensitive Bayesian classifiers and application to mouse pressure pattern classification , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[4]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Web-Based Intelligent Multimedia Tutoring for High Stakes Achievement Tests , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[5]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Digital Chameleons , 2005, Psychological science.

[6]  X.H. Wang,et al.  Multimodal Affective User Interface Using Wireless Devices for Emotion Identification , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[7]  Carson Reynolds,et al.  The HandWave Bluetooth Skin Conductance Sensor , 2005, ACII.

[8]  Adina Magda Florea,et al.  Embedding emotions in an artificial tutor , 2005, Seventh International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC'05).

[9]  el Kaliouby,et al.  Mind-reading machines: automated inference of complex mental states , 2005 .

[10]  Winslow Burleson,et al.  Gender-Specific Approaches to Developing Emotionally Intelligent Learning Companions , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[11]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Toward an Affect-Sensitive AutoTutor , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[12]  James C. Lester,et al.  Modeling self-efficacy in intelligent tutoring systems: An inductive approach , 2008, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[13]  Ashish Kapoor,et al.  Automatic prediction of frustration , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  James C. Lester,et al.  Early Prediction of Student Frustration , 2007, ACII.

[15]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .