"Energy Efficient Ethernet" enhanced with a QoS-aware sleep mode controller

Operating costs and scalability of nowadays telecommunication networks are largely impacted by energy consumption of network equipments. In packet switching devices it is especially due to packet processing, queuing, and input/output interface functionalities. Different approaches to reduce energy consumption in packet switches are emerging, some exploit under-laid optical bypass of transit traffic to reduce their capacity and interfaces, others simplify their operations or turn off some of their functionalities when unnecessary. The IEEE standardization body developed a standard on Energy Efficient Ethernet IEEE P802.3az that defined a mechanism allowing to de-activate the Physical layer elements during periods of low link utilization. It is based on a protocol that coordinates transitions to and from a lower power consumption mode without changing the link status and dropping frames. Time needed by such transitions is, however, comparable with packet transmission time; that makes energy efficiency of the method far from being proportional to interfaces unused capacity. Solutions proposed in the literature to improve EEE performance are mainly based on the buffer and burst approach, which, making the transmission non continuous, creates more opportunities for long sleeping period. Such solutions, however, if applied across the network, strongly impact packet delay requirements. In this paper, a traffic management mechanism that controls sleeping period to reduce EEE transitions overhead while meeting delay constraints of data flows is proposed. Starting from the consideration that in Ethernet network provisioning is static, i.e. service level agreement parameters of each flow are configured on switches output ports of its path via management plane at the set-up phase, the proposed method off-line determines, for each output port, if the activation of a dummy flow, associated to the quiet period, can provide power consumption reduction without impacting data flows delay requirements. On ports where the dummy flow is activated the sleeping period is triggered by the scheduler mechanism each time a dummy packet is served. A comparative analysis between the standard EEE, with and without the support of buffer and burst functionality, and the proposed method has been carried out in order to quantify the improvements in terms of energy efficiency and to assess its effectiveness in terms of Quality of Service QoS.

[1]  Robert Doverspike,et al.  Traffic types and growth in backbone networks , 2011, 2011 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[2]  Ashwin Gumaste,et al.  Next-generation carrier ethernet transport technologies [guest editorial] , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  José Alberto Hernández,et al.  Performance evaluation of energy efficient ethernet , 2009, IEEE Communications Letters.

[4]  Lampros Raptis,et al.  Ethernet as a carrier grade technology: developments and innovations , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Abhay Parekh,et al.  A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks: the single-node case , 1993, TNET.

[6]  R. Sabella,et al.  Packet-optical integration nodes for next generation transport networks , 2012, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[7]  Marina Thottan,et al.  Adapting router buffers for energy efficiency , 2011, CoNEXT '11.

[8]  R.A. Skoog Managing the convergence of Carrier Ethernet with optical transport , 2009, 2009 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication - incudes post deadline papers.

[9]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Power Awareness in Network Design and Routing , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[10]  K. Christensen,et al.  Power Management in Networked Devices , 2004, Computer.

[11]  Pedro Reviriego,et al.  IEEE 802.3az: the road to energy efficient ethernet , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  Raj Jian,et al.  Internet 3.0: Ten Problems with Current Internet Architecture and Solutions for the Next Generation , 2006, MILCOM 2006 - 2006 IEEE Military Communications conference.

[13]  Suresh Singh,et al.  Greening of the internet , 2003, SIGCOMM '03.

[14]  Pedro Reviriego,et al.  An Initial Evaluation of Energy Efficient Ethernet , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[15]  Wolfgang Fischer,et al.  Ethernet-based public communication services: challenge and opportunity , 2004, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  David T. Neilson,et al.  Power dissipation limitations to the scalability of network elements , 2011, 2011 37th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication.

[17]  Sergiu Nedevschi,et al.  Reducing Network Energy Consumption via Sleeping and Rate-Adaptation , 2008, NSDI.

[18]  Francesco Palmieri,et al.  Analyzing Local Strategies for Energy-Efficient Networking , 2011, Networking Workshops.

[19]  Luiz André Barroso,et al.  The Case for Energy-Proportional Computing , 2007, Computer.

[20]  José Alberto Hernández,et al.  Burst Transmission for Energy-Efficient Ethernet , 2010, IEEE Internet Computing.

[21]  Achim Autenrieth,et al.  Carrier Ethernet transport in metro and core networks , 2008, Networks 2008 - The 13th International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium.

[22]  Marco Listanti,et al.  QoS-aware sleep mode controller in “Energy Efficient Ethernet” , 2012, 2012 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).