Palm boards are not action measures: an alternative to the two-systems theory of geographical slant perception.

Whereas most reports of the perception of outdoor hills demonstrate dramatic overestimation, estimates made by adjusting a palm board are much closer to the true hill orientation. We test the dominant hypothesis that palm board accuracy is related to the need for motor action to be accurately guided and conclude instead that the perceptual experience of palm-board orientation is biased and variable due to poorly calibrated proprioception of wrist flexion. Experiments 1 and 3 show that wrist-flexion palm boards grossly underestimate the orientations of near, reachable surfaces whereas gesturing with a free hand is fairly accurate. Experiment 2 shows that palm board estimates are much lower than free hand estimates for an outdoor hill as well. Experiments 4 shows that wrist flexion is biased and noisy compared to elbow flexion, while Experiment 5 shows that small changes in palm board height produce large changes in palm board estimates. Together, these studies suggest that palm boards are biased and insensitive measures. The existing literature arguing that there are two systems in the perception of geographical slant is re-evaluated, and a new theoretical framework is proposed in which a single exaggerated representation of ground-surface orientation guides both action and perception.

[1]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perceiving Distance: A Role of Effort and Intent , 2004, Perception.

[2]  John W Philbeck,et al.  The various perceptions of distance: an alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  M. Turvey,et al.  Perceiving 'Walk-on-able' Slopes , 1992 .

[4]  T. Agostini,et al.  Perception of Visual Inclination in a Real and Simulated Urban Environment , 2007, Perception.

[5]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Does Energy Expenditure Affect the Perception of Egocentric Distance? A Failure to Replicate Experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003) , 2006, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[6]  D. Proffitt.  Affordances matter in geographical slant perception , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Frank H Durgin,et al.  Enhanced Optic Flow Speed Discrimination While Walking: Contextual Tuning of Visual Coding , 2007, Perception.

[8]  Richard Kammann,et al.  The overestimation of vertical distance and slope and its role in the moon illusion , 1967 .

[9]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Perceived Slant: A Dissociation between Perception and Action , 2007, Perception.

[10]  Jack M Loomis,et al.  Does energy expenditure affect the perception of egocentric distance? A failure to replicate experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003). , 2010, The Spanish journal of psychology.

[11]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[12]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  The contributions of egocentric and allocentric reference frames in haptic spatial tasks. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[13]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The precision of locomotor odometry in humans , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  M. Goodale,et al.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand , 1995, Current Biology.

[17]  W. G. Darling,et al.  Perception of arm orientation in three-dimensional space , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Behaviour and Perception in Strange Environments , 1976 .

[19]  C. Pagano,et al.  Expectation affects verbal judgments but not reaches to visually perceived egocentric distances , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  S. Colcombe,et al.  The impact of stereotype threat on age differences in memory performance. , 2003, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[21]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Large Systematic Deviations in the Haptic Perception of Parallelity , 1999, Perception.

[22]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Does position sense at the elbow reflect a sense of elbow joint angle or one of limb orientation? , 1982, Brain Research.

[24]  E. Reed.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1989 .

[25]  M K Kaiser,et al.  How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. , 1995, Science.

[26]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  On judging surface slant using haptic (palm-board) and verbal-report task , 2010 .

[27]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  Defining the cortical visual systems: "what", "where", and "how". , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[28]  M. Goodale,et al.  The objects of action and perception , 1998, Cognition.

[29]  M. Grunwald.  Human haptic perception : basics and applications , 2008 .

[30]  Frank H Durgin,et al.  Downhill slopes look shallower from the edge. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[31]  J M Loomis,et al.  Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Frank H Durgin,et al.  The perceptual experience of slope by foot and by finger. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[34]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  Skating down a Steeper Slope: Fear Influences the Perception of Geographical Slant , 2008, Perception.

[35]  J. Gibson.  The perception of visual surfaces. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[36]  J. Gibson,et al.  The perceived slant of visual surfaces-optical and geographical. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  Krista M. Gigone,et al.  Perception of visual speed while moving. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Rich Gossweiler,et al.  Perceiving geographical slant , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  Irwin Altman,et al.  Behaviour and perception in strange environments. , 1977 .

[40]  R. Shigematsu,et al.  Flexibility and Physical Functions of Older Adults: A Review , 2002 .

[41]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  Review article Understanding the roles of vision in the control of human locomotion , 1997 .

[42]  D. Proffitt.  Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[43]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The Effect of Pictorial Illusion on Prehension and Perception , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Large systematic deviations in a bimanual parallelity task: further analysis of contributing factors. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[45]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance , 2003, Psychological science.

[46]  G. E. Stelmach,et al.  Limb segment inclination sense in proprioception , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  Robert P O'Shea,et al.  Judgments of Visually Perceived Eye Level (VPEL) in Outdoor Scenes: Effects of Slope and Height , 2007, Perception.

[48]  F. Durgin.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE When Walking Makes Perception Better , 2022 .

[49]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Processing Spatial Layout by Perception and Sensorimotor Interaction , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[50]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[51]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Demand characteristics, not effort: The role of backpacks in judging distance , 2010 .

[52]  Viola S. Störmer,et al.  Feature-based interference from unattended visual field during attentional tracking in younger and older adults. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[53]  M. Orne.  On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[54]  A. Kappers,et al.  How robust are the deviations in haptic parallelity? , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[55]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  Dennis R. Proffitt,et al.  Two memories for geographical slant: Separation and interdependence of action and awareness , 1998, Psychonomic bulletin & review.