Regulatory practices and Distribution System Cost impact studies for distributed generation: Considerations for South African distribution utilities and regulators

South Africa has introduced renewable energy generation to its grid by means of a competitive bidding process. This has been successful as it has quickly introduced renewable generation and has reduced the cost generation significantly over the three rounds of bids submitted. The introduction of distributed renewable generation has consequences for the operation and regulation of its Distribution networks. This paper reviews international practices to establish the cost and benefits of distributed generation to Distribution System Operators as well as regulatory rules that affect them. Impact studies for several European Distribution System operators are discussed and the main impacts of Distributed Generation on Distribution networks are identified as being voltage rise, increased fault levels, losses, reduced power flows upstream and the deferral of investments. Regulation of renewable generation in South Africa is compared with a range of European countries. South Africa has implemented a shallowish network charge regime for distributed generators. This lowers costs for generators connecting to the network, however this has introduced the risk of projects being unable to connect due to deep transmission networks that require funding.

[1]  J.R. Abbad,et al.  Assessment of energy distribution losses for increasing penetration of distributed generation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  G. Harrison,et al.  DG Impact on Investment Deferral: Network Planning and Security of Supply , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Dalila B.M.M. Fontes,et al.  Fostering microgeneration in power systems: The effect of legislative limitations ☆ , 2012 .

[4]  Rafael Cossent,et al.  Towards a future with large penetration of distributed generation: Is the current regulation of electricity distribution ready? Regulatory recommendations under a European perspective , 2009 .

[5]  Minas C. Alexiadis,et al.  Energy losses in a distribution line with distributed generation based on stochastic power flow , 2011 .

[6]  G. Joós,et al.  On the Quantification of the Network Capacity Deferral Value of Distributed Generation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Danny Pudjianto,et al.  Costs and Benefits of DG Connections to Grid System - Studies on the UK and Finnish Systems , 2006 .

[8]  Jiuping Pan,et al.  Siting distributed generation to defer T&D expansion , 2001, 2001 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition. Developing New Perspectives (Cat. No.01CH37294).

[9]  Rafael Cossent,et al.  Improvements in current European network regulation to facilitate the integration of distributed generation , 2009 .

[10]  Philip Vogel,et al.  Efficient investment signals for distributed generation , 2009 .

[11]  Tomás Gómez,et al.  Impact of distributed generation on distribution investment deferral , 2006 .

[12]  Carlos Mateo Domingo,et al.  A Reference Network Model for Large-Scale Distribution Planning With Automatic Street Map Generation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  J. D. Joode,et al.  Regulatory road maps for the integration of intermittent electricity generation: Methodology development and the case of The Netherlands , 2011 .