A meta-classifier for detecting prostate cancer by quantitative integration of in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging

Recently, in vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) have emerged as promising new modalities to aid in prostate cancer (CaP) detection. MRI provides anatomic and structural information of the prostate while MRS provides functional data pertaining to biochemical concentrations of metabolites such as creatine, choline and citrate. We have previously presented a hierarchical clustering scheme for CaP detection on in vivo prostate MRS and have recently developed a computer-aided method for CaP detection on in vivo prostate MRI. In this paper we present a novel scheme to develop a meta-classifier to detect CaP in vivo via quantitative integration of multimodal prostate MRS and MRI by use of non-linear dimensionality reduction (NLDR) methods including spectral clustering and locally linear embedding (LLE). Quantitative integration of multimodal image data (MRI and PET) involves the concatenation of image intensities following image registration. However multimodal data integration is non-trivial when the individual modalities include spectral and image intensity data. We propose a data combination solution wherein we project the feature spaces (image intensities and spectral data) associated with each of the modalities into a lower dimensional embedding space via NLDR. NLDR methods preserve the relationships between the objects in the original high dimensional space when projecting them into the reduced low dimensional space. Since the original spectral and image intensity data are divorced from their original physical meaning in the reduced dimensional space, data at the same spatial location can be integrated by concatenating the respective embedding vectors. Unsupervised consensus clustering is then used to partition objects into different classes in the combined MRS and MRI embedding space. Quantitative results of our multimodal computer-aided diagnosis scheme on 16 sets of patient data obtained from the ACRIN trial, for which corresponding histological ground truth for spatial extent of CaP is known, show a marginally higher sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value compared to corresponding CAD results with the individual modalities.

[1]  P. Carroll,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of prostate cancer. , 2006, Reviews in urology.

[2]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized cuts and image segmentation , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  George Lee,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Dimensionality Reduction Methods for Classifying Gene and Protein Expression Datasets , 2007, ISBRA.

[4]  A. Wunderlich,et al.  Multimodal Cranial Neuronavigation: Direct Integration of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography Data: Technical Note , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[5]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[6]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high-resolution ex vivo MRI , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A Hierarchical Unsupervised Spectral Clustering Scheme for Detection of Prostate Cancer from Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) , 2007, MICCAI.

[8]  R E Lenkinski,et al.  Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1993, Radiology.

[9]  W. Catalona,et al.  Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Kazuto Ito,et al.  The combination of multi-voxel MR spectroscopy with MR imaging improve the diagnostic accuracy for localization of prostate cancer. , 2003, Anticancer research.

[11]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Multimodal image registration of ex vivo 4 Tesla MRI with whole mount histology for prostate cancer detection , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  John Kurhanewicz,et al.  Quantification of prostate MRSI data by model‐based time domain fitting and frequency domain analysis , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[13]  William Wells,et al.  Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier. , 2003, Medical physics.

[14]  Jarkko Venna,et al.  Local multidimensional scaling , 2006, Neural Networks.

[15]  K JainAnil,et al.  Combining Multiple Clusterings Using Evidence Accumulation , 2005 .

[16]  Ana L. N. Fred,et al.  Combining multiple clusterings using evidence accumulation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  D. Vigneron,et al.  An automated technique for the quantitative assessment of 3D‐MRSI data from patients with glioma , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.