Selective hydrodesulfurization of FCC naphtha with supported MoS2 catalysts : The role of cobalt

The catalytic activity and selectivity for hydrodesulfurization (HDS) and olefin hydrogenation of FCC naphtha have been determined for MoS2 (no Co) catalysts on different supports and for a commercial CoMo/alumina HDS catalyst both with and without the addition of alkali. For MoS2 catalysts, the specific HDS activity is higher on silica than alumina, while addition of Cs resulted in no change in the activity. The differences in activity, however, are relatively small, a factor of less than two. EXAFS and XRD structural analysis indicate that small MoS2 particles are present on all catalysts. The differences in rate are not due to differences in particle size, dispersion, or support physical properties, but are likely due to the modification of catalytic properties by an interaction with the support. While there is a small influence on the rate, the composition of the support, or modification by Cs, has no effect on the HDS/olefin hydrogenation selectivity. The olefin hydrogenation conversion increases linearly with HDS conversion, and at high HDS conversion, few olefins remain in the FCC naphtha. Similar to the effect for Cs promotion of MoS2 on alumina, the addition of K to sulfided CoMo/alumina had little affect on the activity or selectivity for HDS and olefin hydrogenation. Unlike MoS2 catalysts, however, with sulfided CoMo at less than about 85% HDS conversion, the rate of olefin hydrogenation is low, but it increases rapidly as the sulfur in the naphtha drops below about 300 ppm. Selective HDS of FCC naphtha appears to correlate primarily to the formation of the CoMoS phase, rather than to the basic nature of the support. It is proposed that the enhanced olefin hydrogenation selectivity of CoMo catalysts is due to the competitive adsorption of sulfur compounds, which inhibit adsorption and saturation of olefins in the naphtha.

[1]  Roel Prins,et al.  Why EXAFS Underestimated the Size of Small Supported MoS2 Particles , 1998 .

[2]  C. Geantet,et al.  Crystallite Size Determination of Highly Dispersed Unsupported MoS2Catalysts , 1998 .

[3]  S. Eijsbouts On the flexibility of the active phase in hydrotreating catalysts , 1997 .

[4]  J. Geus,et al.  A Mo–K Edge XAFS Study of the Metal Sulfide-Support Interaction in (Co)Mo Supported Alumina and Titania Catalysts , 1997 .

[5]  Ya-ning Xie,et al.  An EXAFS study on oxidic and sulfided K-MoO3/γ-Al2O3 catalysts , 1996 .

[6]  Ankudinov,et al.  Multiple-scattering calculations of x-ray-absorption spectra. , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[7]  C. Geantet,et al.  Preparation of High-Surface-Area Mo/ZrO2 Catalysts by a Molten Salt Method: Application to Hydrodesulfurization , 1995 .

[8]  M. Vrinat,et al.  Zirconia- and alumina-supported molybdenum-based catalysts: a comparative study in hydrodesulfurization and hydrogenation reactions , 1994 .

[9]  Jens K. Nørskov,et al.  A New Procedure for Particle Size Determination by EXAFS Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 1993 .

[10]  Y. Yoshimura,et al.  EXAFS study on the dispersion of molybdenum sulfide catalysts on γ-Al2O3 , 1993 .

[11]  R. Prins,et al.  An EXAFS Study on the Ni and W Environment in Carbon-Supported, Sulfided W and Ni-W Catalysts , 1993 .

[12]  R. Prins,et al.  Ni EXAFS studies of the Ni-Mo-S structure in carbon-supported and alumina-supported Ni-Mo catalysts , 1992 .

[13]  M. Vrinat,et al.  Support effects on hydrotreating catalysts , 1991 .

[14]  R. Prins,et al.  EXAFS Determination of the Structure of Cobalt in Carbon-Supported Cobalt and Cobalt-Molybdenum Sulfide Hydrodesulfurization Catalysts. , 1991 .

[15]  K. Pratt,et al.  Morphology and activity of MoS2 on various supports: Genesis of the active phase , 1990 .

[16]  D. Koningsberger,et al.  Structure of the Molybdenum Sulfide Phase in Carbon-Supported Molybdenum and Cobalt-Molybdenum Sulfide Catalysts as Studied by EXAFS. , 1990 .

[17]  Y. Yoshimura,et al.  Support effect on the catalytic activity and properties of sulfided molybdenum catalysts , 1988 .

[18]  N. Nag A comparative study on the dispersion and carrier-catalyst interaction of molybdenum oxides supported on various oxides by electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis , 1987 .

[19]  F. Massoth,et al.  Catalytic functionalities of supported sulfides. I: Effect of support and additives on the CoMo catalyst , 1984 .

[20]  J. Arrieta,et al.  Correlation between thiophene hydrodesulfurization activity and the number of first sulfur neighbors as determined by EXAFS in sulfided .gamma.-alumina-supported cobalt-molybdenum (CoMo/.gamma.-Al2O3) samples , 1983 .

[21]  F. Massoth,et al.  Catalytic functionalities of supported sulfides. II. Effect of support on Mo dispersion , 1982 .

[22]  B. Lengeler,et al.  Extended X-Ray Absorption Fine Structure Study of Co-Mo Hydrodesulfurization Catalysts , 1981 .

[23]  D. Sayers,et al.  Criteria for automatic x‐ray absorption fine structure background removal , 1981 .

[24]  E. Prestridge,et al.  Molybdenum Disulfide in the Poorly Crystalline "Rag" Structure , 1979, Science.

[25]  N. Elliott Interatomic Distances in FeS2, CoS2, and NiS2 , 1960 .

[26]  Linus Pauling,et al.  The Crystal Structure of Molybdenite , 1923 .