Testing Tinto: How Do Retention Theories Work for First-Generation, Working-Class Students?

This article presents results of a multiple case study involving four first-generation, working-class, white male college freshmen who discuss their perceptions of faculty support. These perceptions are analyzed using Tinto's theories of student retention, specifically as they relate to faculty-student interaction. The study found that first-generation, working-class students are intimidated by the idea of seeking out faculty for support, resulting in a lack of support from their faculty. Since Tinto's theories find a strong link between faculty support and student retention, this study suggests that colleges need to be more strategic and systematic in finding ways to develop faculty-student interactions for first-generation, working-class college students.

[1]  Vincent Tinto.  Principles of Effective Retention. , 1987 .

[2]  R. Littleton.  Developmental Education: Are Community Colleges the Solution?. , 1998 .

[3]  Michael B. Paulsen,et al.  Comparing the Determinants of Persistence for First-Generation and Continuing-Generation Students , 2005 .

[4]  G. Piorkowski.  Survivor Guilt in the University Setting. , 1983 .

[5]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Stages of Student Departure: Reflections on the Longitudinal Character of Student Leaving , 1988 .

[6]  Ricardo D. Stanton-Salazar,et al.  Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: information networks among Mexican-origin high school students , 1995 .

[7]  Gregory C. Wolniak,et al.  Experiences and Outcomes of First-Generation Students in Community Colleges , 2003 .

[8]  R. Longwell-Grice.  Get a Job: Working Class Students Discuss the Purpose of College. , 2003 .

[9]  Richard Sennett,et al.  The Hidden Injuries of Class , 1973 .

[10]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[11]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  The Condition of education , 1975 .

[12]  Annette Lareau.  SOCIAL CLASS DIFFERENCES IN FAMILY-SCHOOL RELATIONSHIPS: THE IMPORTANCE OF CULTURAL CAPITAL , 1987 .

[13]  Patricia M. McDonough,et al.  Choosing Colleges: How Social Class and Schools Structure Opportunity , 1999 .

[14]  Linda Serra Hagedorn,et al.  Understanding Students' Parental Education Beyond First-Generation Status , 2004 .

[15]  Barbara Jacoby,et al.  Why Involve Commuter Students in Learning , 2000 .

[16]  Vincent Tinto,et al.  Taking Retention Seriously: Rethinking the First Year of College , 1999 .

[17]  Richard C. Richardson,et al.  Helping First-Generation Minority Students Achieve Degrees. , 1992 .

[18]  L. Zwerling,et al.  First-Generation Students: Confronting the Cultural Issues. New Directions for Community Colleges, Number 80. , 1992 .

[19]  Howard B. London.  Breaking Away: A Study of First-Generation College Students and Their Families , 1989, American Journal of Education.

[20]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development , 1996 .

[21]  P. Willis.  Learning to Labor: How Working-Class Kids Get Working-Class Jobs , 1976 .

[22]  J. Creswell,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design , 1998 .

[23]  Barbara F. Okun,et al.  Understanding Diversity: A Learning-as-Practice Primer , 1998 .