The effects of terminal-link fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules on responding under concurrent chained schedules.

Previous work using variable-interval schedules in the terminal links of concurrent chained schedules suggested that relative choice proportion in the initial links equalled relative rate of reinforcement in the terminal links. With fixed-interval terminal-link schedules, however, matching was not obtained. The present study held pairs of fixed-interval terminal-link schedules in a constant ratio but varied absolute sizes. Relative choice for the smaller terminal-link fixed-interval schedule was a negatively accelerated, increasing function of absolute size of the fixed-interval pairs. Matching was found only with the fixed-interval pair of 5 and 10 sec. When pairs of variable-interval schedules were arranged so that the harmonic mean of the intervals equalled the fixed-interval parameter values, relative choice functions were like those for fixed-interval schedules.

[1]  R. Herrnstein.  APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  R. Herrnstein.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  P. Killeen.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  Louis W. Gellermann.  Chance Orders of Alternating Stimuli in Visual Discrimination Experiments , 1933 .

[5]  A C CATANIA,et al.  Behavioral contrast in a multiple and concurrent schedule of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  M. Davison.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  CHOICE FOR PERIODIC SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1 , 1970 .

[9]  G. S. Reynolds,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Choice and delay of reinforcement. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  E. Fantino.  Choice and rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  P. Killeen.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.